Pelican Parts Forums

Pelican Parts Forums (http://forums.pelicanparts.com/)
-   Porsche 911 Technical Forum (http://forums.pelicanparts.com/porsche-911-technical-forum/)
-   -   T vs E mfi (http://forums.pelicanparts.com/porsche-911-technical-forum/188109-t-vs-e-mfi.html)

BK911 10-20-2004 06:34 AM

T vs E mfi
 
Hello!

Besides the space cam in the mechanical MFI pump, are there any other differences in T vs. E MFI systems? Stack diameters, throttle bodies, etc..

Thanks!
BK

Jim Richards 10-20-2004 06:43 AM

Brian, this is a good thread to answer your questions:
http://forums.pelicanparts.com/showthread.php?s=&threadid=117171&highlight=mfi+ch art+stack+throttle+bodies

Grady Clay 10-20-2004 06:45 AM

Yes: The intake runners in the heads, the throttle bodies, the intake stacks, distributor curve, and of course the camshafts. The P&Cs are different resulting in different compression ratio.
In a 2.0 there is a difference in valve size.
In a 2.0T and 2.2T the crankshaft is cast and without counterweights.
There is also the color of the fan shroud.

Best,
Grady

BK911 10-20-2004 07:40 AM

Awesome! That's what I needed. But now I am confused a little. I would think 2. and 3. should be the same dimension, as should 4. and 5. If not you have a 'step' in the intake path.

1. Top opening of stack
2. Bottom opening of stack
3. Top opening of throttle body
4. Bottom opening of throttle body
5. Cylinder intake port.

This shows the flow pattern going down into the cylinder.

Year..69'.......70/71'.....72/73'

T

1.......n/a........n/a......35mm
2.......n/a........n/a......32mm
3.......n/a........n/a......38mm
4.......n/a........n/a......29mm
5.......n/a........n/a......29mm

E

1.......39mm....38mm....38mm
2.......35mm....35mm....35mm
3.......38mm....38mm....38mm
4.......32mm....32mm....32mm
5.......32mm....32mm....32mm

Scott Clarke 10-20-2004 07:46 AM

Yes, there is a "step." All of the throttle plates (T,E, and S) are the same size, so steps are required to provide the various intake track diameters. Notice, however, that "4" and "5" always match.
-Scott

fryardds 10-20-2004 08:32 AM

This may be obvious, but the US 911T only had MFI on the 2.4L engines for '72 and part of '73. Elsewhere they remained carburetted.

TargaT 10-22-2004 05:33 AM

Waynes' rebuild book (pg. 201) indicates both the intake and exhaust ports are the same for the T and E 2.4. Is this correct or a typo? can anybody confirm.

Thanks, Joe

Tim Walsh 10-22-2004 05:37 AM

If I remember correctly T's and E's had the same exhaust port size (32mm) and they had the same distributor curve. The 2.2.s and 2.0's had different ignition curves as did the 2.7RS, but the 2.4T, E and S all used the same ignition curve.

Lukesportsman 10-22-2004 08:45 AM

Is there any visual way of knowing what curve you have installed? I know that you could measure it, but was curious if there was a visual color identifier in the distributor. I have an engine built to like RS spec, and was curious to verify ignition changes. It does have the higher rev limits installed.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:44 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2025 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Pelican Parts Website


DTO Garage Plus vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.