Pelican Parts Forums

Pelican Parts Forums (http://forums.pelicanparts.com/)
-   Porsche 911 Technical Forum (http://forums.pelicanparts.com/porsche-911-technical-forum/)
-   -   Front-end push (http://forums.pelicanparts.com/porsche-911-technical-forum/188356-front-end-push.html)

nhromyak 10-21-2004 12:15 PM

Front-end push
 
After an at-home lowering (24 3/4" front, 24 1/2" rear) and corner balance, then off to an alignment shop (twice). I am still having problems with a front-end push.

My corner balance was within 15 lbs of (L&R to front and rear) each other. Without driver weight.

IIRC - the front end is
1/16" toe-in
negative 0.9 and negative 1.1 (Left and Right)
Caster at ~ 6. (I forget both sides right now).

This was done on a laser (somename) 4000 alignment machine.

The rear camber is negative 1.3 and 1.5 (L & R)
Toe is 1/16" (or less, I forget this one too).

I have 205/55 Bridgestone RE730s up front (on Fuch 7") with
245/45 RE750s (Fuch 9") in the rear.

I seem to get the squeaky tires in a complete U-turn going slowly, as well as the front-end is pushing WELL before the rear-end gets at all loose. I get the front-end tire howlling in long fast sweepers as well.

I replaced the Tie-rods, lubed the rack (that was fun) and adjusted front-bearings with no noticeable difference.


The car seems VERY succeptible to bump steer. Is it TOO low?
I am thinking of having someone else do a corner balance and bring it back to factory heights (25 1/2 front, with a 25" rear).

The tires are wearing evenly albeit they are low on tread in the front.

Before I just thought this was a tire size difference (205 vs 245), but it seems too weird now in slow turns, let alone fast sweepers.

It's as if, the turning amount between left and right tires are incorrect whenever the wheel is turned in either direction.
Could it be a steering rack (alignment) problem?
In other words, could the steering rack be off of it's left and right steering center?

I am at a loss as the laser alignment is mostly appropriate.

I get this same nasty front-end push with my Kuhmos VictorRacers running 225/50s front and rear on 7 & 8 15" Fuchs.

So it must be a problem with the alignment or something is not right with the front end. :(

I have checked the rear swaybar brakets and mounts, all appears to be in tact.

TIA

Nick

Tyson Schmidt 10-21-2004 12:32 PM

What torsions and sways are you running?

nhromyak 10-21-2004 12:34 PM

Stock Torsion and sway bars. I have replaced the rear bushings.

I was going to do the fronts, but I don't have a lathe. :(

Wil Ferch 10-21-2004 12:44 PM

Coupla things:
1.) all 911'a will have some low speed push , especially if you get on the gas too soon/ too hard. Is this 911 different in this respect to other 911's ?
2.) 7 front and 9 rear is recipe for understeer, especially with 205 fr / 245 rear. 7" front can go 225 to help...or rear can be 8" to help. Personally , I run 7 front / 7 rear on my 85 with stock 19 fr/ 24.1 rear TB's. I find better "balance" to be more important ( to me) than optimizing grip at one end of the car.
3.) Rack may no longer be on-center. How many turns lock-to-lock?...how many turns left-to-stop....how many turns right-to-stop? Are left/right equal amount of turns?
4.) sloppy, worn front bushings don't help.

Wil

nhromyak 10-21-2004 01:06 PM

Thanks for the reply.

1) This seems to be more than a low-end push. I would not expect this to exist in long fast sweepers (at constant speed). As I recall, it is different than other 911s. I have been hesitant to drive anothers 911 as agressively I drive mine.

2) I understand the 7 & 9 recipe, so why do I get this with my 225/ 50 F&R on 7 & 8s?

3) Lock to lock = just over 3 turns.
Left from center just over 1 1/2 steering wheel turns
Right from center the same - 1 1/2

4) How can I check the front bushings.

It seems like it is something more than front bushings. :(

Basically, I wonder if it's too low. This has been a problem since I lowered the car. But I thought an alignment (or two) would cure it.

Could it really be front bushings?

Superman 10-21-2004 01:24 PM

Our cars do push very much, in low-speed, open-throttle maneuvers. Very frustrating at times. Autocross is a GREAT place to understand and learn to overcome this understeer, or at least get used to it. There are some things you can do, but some of those things can cause high-speed handling to suffer.

911mot 10-21-2004 01:27 PM

Quote:

1/16" toe-in
Shouldn't front toe be 0 deg?

masraum 10-21-2004 02:07 PM

generally you want a little toe in on the front unless the car is an autoX car. some front toe in gives the car more high speed stability.

nhromyak 10-21-2004 02:57 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Superman
Autocross is a GREAT place to understand and learn to overcome this understeer, or at least get used to it.
I've done a bit of autocrossing, even the instructors were wondering about my front squealing tires. :(

Front Tire pressure is 29
Rear is at 41 - 42. (they wore in the center faster at 36).

I have tried lowering the front psi by 2 and going up as much as 34 in the front. No noticeable affect on squealing or handling in the front.

If I go up more pressure in the rear (44 - 45), the front seems to be better. :confused:

The front-end push is worse with a full tank of gas.

Zeke 10-21-2004 03:12 PM

First of all, you don't necessarily need a lathe to install front a-arm bushings. It helps if you are super particular. You could just buy Elephant's polybronze in that case. Or, you can play around until you get the best fit mixing parts. Install the grease zerks.

Do you have a bump steer kit? Although I don't think they are good for more than an inch of lowering, if that, they do help somewhat. I get that from my 914 which had a 911 front end in it. That doesn't matter much either; for all practical purposes, they are the same.

Last, what tire pressures do you run? After you dial in the alignment and experiment with the tire pressures, you might try messing with sway bars. You can change one or the other for not that much money.

I'm not a 911 handling guru. I know you can get some of that understeer out w/o breaking the bank and by driving a little differently.

Wait on this thread to develop. It will all come out. What do the rest of you guys think about a heavier sway bar on the rear?

EDIT: Sorry, I didn't see your tire pressures. I probably was taking my time typing this. :D They sure look out of whack. You must be trying too hard to compensate with the pressues. Cancel that thought.

steve911 10-21-2004 03:14 PM

Nick--
Have you tried a different set of tires? Reason I ask is tha IIRC, one of the knocks on the 730's I heard from the Tire Rack guys was that the 730's begin to 'howl' when they were worn. I ended up passing on the 730's and buying Kumho Ecsta 712s, though admittedly I don't drive mine that agressively.

Also, I run 32/36, which seems to help eliminate the push I used to feel in my front end on higher speed sweepers.

just my less than .02

cstreit 10-21-2004 03:24 PM

You're running 205's and 245's with toe IN on the front, of course you have understeer.

I actually run about 1/32-1/16th toe OUT on my racecar. Turn in is great with the compromise being dodgier steering at high speeds and under braking.

Not only that, but the rule of tumb is that you increase pressure to the tire that's getting the least traction. You've got the opposite.

David 10-21-2004 03:46 PM

This has me wondering about the tire setup I've been contemplating: 225/40-18 on 8.5" wheels in front and 295/30-18 on 11" wheels in back. I've got 22mm adjustable sway bars front and rear and I figure I'd have to change to a 19mm bar in front. I don't know what torsion bars I have since the PO didn't have it in his records.

nhromyak 10-21-2004 04:53 PM

Thanks for everyone's reply.

Zeke -
the bushings would not go. I had a hard enough time with the rear-end. With it on jackstands in my garage, I was not willing to push and pull on the car with me under it. :D

I have the bump-steer kit (thick washers).

I have tried the Weltmeister 22MM adjustable in the rear. Set on full anti-sway (closest to the perpindicular), with the thought that closer to the bar (as opposed to being fruther on the outside of the lever) it would be harder for the sway bar to be leveraged.

Barely noticable against my stock rear sway bar.


Steve -
I thought it may be the RE730s in the front. As my RE730s in the rear MOANED when they were low. They MOANED SO LOUDLY I thought I lost a rear-bearing or two.

I have a set of Kuhmo VictorRacers 225/50 front and rear on anothe set of 7 & 8" fuchs. I still get this squirrely feel/noise in the front tires when I am turning. These are really noticeable when making a U-turn, it's like a 4-wheel drive vehicle in the front (if you own a 4WD you know), when these tires are hot.

I tried going up in front pressures up to 4 more than recommendations with nothing really noticeable.


CSTREIT -
I will bring out the toe and try it. It's seems more mechanical problem than tires, because of the slow and higher-speed driving turning issues.
I just didn't think a laser alignment could be that far off.. twice.

I will get the toe more out tomorrow, by turning one of the tie-rods (1/2 turn? 1 turn?) and see? How much should I go for in ONE tie-rod revoution? anyone?

Thanks for the help, any other suggestions?

I wonder if it's not Camber. The car is VERY darty with little bumps and road abnormalities.

Tyson Schmidt 10-21-2004 05:18 PM

Stock torsions are set so that the car has lots of understeer. They're dumbed-down for the masses.

If you want to keep it streetable, I like 26mm in the rear with stock in front. And shock valving has a huge effect on transitional handling.

Is the understeer on initial turn-in, or steady-state? Shock valving will help immensely with initial turn-in and corner entry understeer, and torsions/sways can be tuned for steady state, and transitions.

nhromyak 10-21-2004 05:24 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Tyson Schmidt
Stock torsions are set so that the car has lots of understeer. They're dumbed-down for the masses.

If you want to keep it streetable, I like 26mm in the rear with stock in front. And shock valving has a huge effect on transitional handling.

Is the understeer on initial turn-in, or steady-state? Shock valving will help immensely with initial turn-in and corner entry understeer, and torsions/sways can be tuned for steady state, and transitions.

Understeer is on both initial turn-in (not so pronounced though) and steady-state. It is steady-state like on long fast (70 - 80 MPH) sweepers. On these sweepers, I am not accelerating or decellerating, I just hear the annoying front-end howl (eeeerrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr).

If I decel, it's better, accelerate a little worse. I can "wiggle" the steering wheel on the tires will also yell more if I turn MORE into the long sweeper. They yell less, as I turn out of the sweeper. So definately, the front tires.

It's like the TOE is incorrect for the turn, IIRC - this is called the anker-man angle (sp?).

And as such, the toe is incorrect for speed and slow turns.

efhughes3 10-21-2004 05:26 PM

I don't understand your reply to Zeke. The front bushings come off with the A arms, and then off of those with a knife and a little heat. ABSOLUTElY no machining required on the Elephant polybronze bushings, they are really easy to install. I did it, that's proof enough!

Zeke 10-21-2004 06:31 PM

Ed, I understand his reply. The polyurethane bushings can be a beotch. I have assembled the whole shebang on a bench and then bolted it on as a unit. Only way to go.

And, the ratio of the inside wheel turning in vs. the outside is called the ackerman and is pronouned as it reads. You can't really do anything to change that w/o reworking the steering arms, etc. So, that is not the problem as your car is the same as the next in that respect.

Chuck Moreland 10-21-2004 06:35 PM

Your tire pressure of 29 front and 41 rear is plenty reason alone to cause understeer, especially with 205/245 tires. You should be running more like 2-3 lbs higher in the rear than in the front (maybe even the same pressure with those tires, you need to experiment). eg. 30 front 32 rear.

nhromyak 10-21-2004 06:51 PM

32 REAR?!?!?!? WOW, then the inside of my 245s would wear VER VERY fast... :(
I usually run 80 + MPH on the hiway. At these speeds, as I understand Bruce Anderson, the inner side of the carcass will flex and cause more wear because of the centrifugal Gs on the tire. IIRC - the centrifugal force at 75 MPH is something around 21 Gs. Therefore higher pressures are needed on a radial tire to keep the center of a wider radial tire from flexing outward causing center tire wear. Hence, I found 41 PSI on the rear tire to be the best tire wear and handling characteristics (for the rear).


I have found my car handles like absolute dogmeat at 36 psi or lower pressures in the rear. I will try it tomorrow just to confirm my experiments from previous years.

Thanks for the replies, again.

Chuck Moreland 10-21-2004 07:05 PM

"Dogmeat" is somewhat vague and hard to diagnose. If your tires like more pressure, fine. D ifferent tires like different pressure. But start with a delta in the 2-3 lb range, then adjust to taste.


32 is not a low tire pressure and is likely to provide significantly more grip than 41 lbs. Don't confuse grip with under/oversteer characteristics.

If your tires say 41 psi max pressure, it is exactly that. MAX pressure, it is not recommended pressure.

nhromyak 10-21-2004 07:08 PM

"Dogmeat" is the opposite of good. :D

I will try lower pressures in the rear tomorrow morning.

But would higher pressures (or lower pressures) in the rear affect the the front tires grip (or smoothness) during a U-turn as well?

Something just doesn't seem right. It's like my old Chevy Blazer ('73) in 4WD when I make a U-turn on the street.

HarryD 10-21-2004 07:23 PM

To get your tire pressures dialed in, you might want to try the Autocrossers trick of putting some chalk marks on the shoulders fo the tires and adjust the pressures until the shoulders are clean right to the edge. I know for my car with 205/60-15 M&S street tires all around, normal driving has my pressures set at 29F/32R. For AutoX I increase to 34F/37R to get full coverage of my tread without getting onto the sidewalls. FWIW, on long decreasing radius turns, I do develop a push (20-30 mph) but I hold my nose and drive through it.

Hope this helps

nhromyak 10-21-2004 07:32 PM

The one long sweeper that I have been "having fun" with is not (or does not appear to be) a decreasing radius turn. :(

Interesting psi numbers for street and auto-x.

Will any ol' chalk do? Or is there something special I should use?

Last time I tried chalk, the tread wiped away within the first block...

Or am I supposed to chalk the edges of the tire, and then lower pressures until the side of the chalk wipe away in turns?

Thanks for the reply.

nhromyak 10-21-2004 07:35 PM

I just measured my front toe with string, pins, and measuring tape.
It looks like it is 1/8" toe-in.

I have 55 1/8" on the front string with 55 1/4" on the back string. Of course, I would never say this is more accurate than the laser alignment. Could this 1/8" toe-in by my problem? It seems too insignificant to be a like the problems I am having.

HarryD 10-21-2004 08:15 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by nhromyak
The one long sweeper that I have been "having fun" with is not (or does not appear to be) a decreasing radius turn. :(

Interesting psi numbers for street and auto-x.

Will any ol' chalk do? Or is there something special I should use?

Last time I tried chalk, the tread wiped away within the first block...

Or am I supposed to chalk the edges of the tire, and then lower pressures until the side of the chalk wipe away in turns?

Thanks for the reply.

I have used both my kids sidewalk chalk and white shoe polish. The polish lasts longer. I start low and bump up 2 psi (plus re-chalk) until the sidewalls keep their chalk marks but the square to the road thread is clean.

RaceProEngineer 10-21-2004 09:01 PM

Nick,

Like most of these mystery problems, you undoubtedly have more than one malady acting together. I have a couple suggestions:

(1) Stating the obvious, some tires howl at very slight slip angles. Others "speak" more readily as the tread wears down. The important thing is not to equate tire squeal with understeer.

(2) Have you eliminated the possibility that your car has front end damage from a former life? The alignment figures and corner weights seem to indicate that the pieces fit together correctly, but it is something to check.

(3) Barring damage, your solution will be found in the suggestions of Chuck and Tyson - a combination of problems. To elaborate:

- Let's leave the tire squeal out of the equation for now.

- Make certain you have no "binding" in the up and down movement of the front or rear suspension. Push down hard on each fender to ensure the travel is smooth.

- You claim your handling balance improves when you inflate your 245 rears beyond 42 PSI. Naturally! You are crowning those tires so that only a fraction of the contact patch is touching the pavement. It now "balances" the poor traction at the front, and the car handles more neutral.

- As Chuck suggests, take your pressures down in the 27F / 30R range, for starters.

- Somewhere buried in the thread, and glossed over, was Tyson's keen questions about shocks, and specifically shock valving. Where to begin?
(a) If you have adjustable shock absorbers, make certain the fronts are not set to "full hard" while the rears are set softer.
(b) If they are not adjustable, are they "matched" (the same brand and model on front and rear)?
(c) If matched, do the fronts "bottom" when you press down hard on the fender? Do they resist downward movement entirely?

Concentrate on looking for front end damage, on getting tire pressures into a sane range, and explore what those shock absorbers are doing.

Ed LoPresti
RacePro Engineering

KobaltBlau 10-21-2004 09:10 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Tyson Schmidt
Stock torsions are set so that the car has lots of understeer. They're dumbed-down for the masses.
what combo did you have on Scruffy, Tyson?

Also, what compromise street/track bar combo do you favor for an SC (full interior) weight car?

TIA!

stlrj 10-22-2004 04:21 AM

Nick,

I had a similar experience when I had my SC lowered and aligned by the a very experienced fellow who used to work in San Rafael who aligned Redwood PCA member cars on a regular basis, so I was more than confident that he knew his way around 911's.

When he was finished my alignment numbers were very similar to yours and the handling was just what you experienced: lots of tire squeal front and rear, more front end push, rear would break loose at a lower speed than before with lots of noise. This was not what I expected or wanted but longed for an improvement that would have given me a competative edge. This was clearly not the path I wanted.

So off to my garage I went, not wanting to pay again to undo everthing, I deceided to meticulously take it back up to stock height and align it to the book on my own. After a test drive with everthing to stock, I was rewarded with superb handling, less tire noise, much less push than before and the rear end stayed planted so much better that I could hardly get it to break loose at all. What a surprise!

Later, I wanted to see if I could eliminate the front push once and for all with further tweeking. What I finally settled on was a reduction of caster to 2.6 degrees instead of the stock 6 and camber of 0.5 degrees positive, just what it calls for in the Spec Book.

Not only does my front end not push at all but it sticks so well that I now get that classic 911 inside wheel lift with more control than ever.

If you ever get down to Novato, I invite you take it for a spin and see for yourself.

Just send me a PM.

Cheers,

Joe Garcia
Redwood PCA since 1976

dickster 10-22-2004 04:33 AM

nick

is the problem the same in right and left handers?

the reason i ask is that i have been chasing the same problem - but mine only does it in right handers! in lefties it handles like its on rails! (plenty of posts on it)

i have done loads too. i am now running 22/31 t/bars and still have the same!

i am hoping an alignment shortly will sort it once and for all.

good luck.

Wil Ferch 10-22-2004 04:45 AM

chuck's tire pressure comments are v. good...

Try something like 32 fr / 34 rear ( Cold!)....and don't be surprised that they go up 6 psi hot. Yikes ! ....40+ cold ????

The counter point you make on how the car handles at lower pressures is indicative also of the wide split in front and rear section widths ( 205/245 as someone mentioned). Therefore, also try 30 fr / 36 rear ( cold).

Wil

nhromyak 10-22-2004 09:06 AM

Thanks for everones replies.

I had a '73 911 before this one. I fully expected the rear to come out, I absolutely NEVER had the front end loose its grip before the rear on this car. I give it more gas, and the rear-end would plant down. This is what I expect out of this '85 911. This is how it was before I lowered it.

Should I simply start looking for some 225/50 front tires?

HarryD -
I am off to buy some shoe polish. Just to be clear, I am to put the polish over the edge from the tread over to the sidewall, correct?


RaceProEngineer-

(1) Perhaps these lower treaded RE730s are simply "speaking" more easily and are losing grip much faster than they have in the past.
(2) I have not eliminated front end damage.
But I did not have this problem before lowering the car. I certainly can not see anything, I will have to have it checked. Scary :(

(3) I can't make the car go up and down in any corner more than 1/2". I don't think I can make any corner go much beyond 1/4" movement really.

Hmmm, when I am in the long sweeper if I turn the wheel more into the long sweeper the car doesn't respond as I would expect, therefore, along with the sqeal in the turn, this is understeer, yes?
Especially, as this happens when I am going slow as well.

Quote:

- You claim your handling balance improves when you inflate your 245 rears beyond 42 PSI. Naturally! You are crowning those tires so that only a fraction of the contact patch is touching the pavement. It now "balances" the poor traction at the front, and the car handles more neutral.
Then why would the Turbos run 45 psi cold with this tire, and rim size? Do they crown too?
I know they are a little heavier in the rear and have stronger Torsion bars. Additionally, when I inflate the rear to the higher pressures, the rear still does not come out. I gain more speed in the long sweepers judging by the speedo in the same sweeper, and how the front end handles in low and higher speed curves seems to get better.
Additionally, when I run 225/50s all the way around, I still have this horrible front-end push....

STLRJ -
What car, tire sizes, torsion bars, sway bar combination(s) do you have?
I fully expect the front-end to stay planted, and the rear to come out. After the lowering, and alignment, I have only been able to make my rear-end wiggle, not really come out. I hit the gas when it does, and the front-end gets worse.

Dickster -
Same issue left and right handed turns. Same issue with 225/50s tires front and rear.


I know my problems are something simple, I will go for a drive, get some shoe polish, lower the pressures, and see that sweeper. :D
If not much comes of that, I will make some changes to my toe.

Chuck Moreland 10-22-2004 10:35 AM

You might have multiple issues at play. But you definitely have a tire pressure problem, and that is easy to fix.

So why not do that, then see where you are.

HarryD 10-22-2004 10:44 AM

Yep, put the polish on the thread and a bit down the side wall. you are looking for the polish to stay on the sidewall but wear off of the thread.

jluetjen 10-22-2004 11:01 AM

I concur here that your tire pressures are pretty far out of the norm. I've noticed (on other cars) that radial front tires can be noisy and pushy if they are down by a few pounds. BTW, my two cents is that adjusting the rear tire pressures up to 40 lbs + to reduce inside shoulder wear is like using a chisel as a screw driver. Sure it might work in a pinch, but it is definitely the wrong tool for the job. I'd put the rear pressures back to the normal zone (low 30's) and back off on the camber if you really want to reduce the tire wear. Basically, put the suspension settings back to stock and your wear problem will be pretty close to minimized. Inside shoulder wear is just a fact of life on a lowered 911, especially with increased negative camber. If your car is over-lowered, that could be sending your front end suspension geometry off the scale (specifically the roll center could now be way too low) which would also show up as chronic understeer. If you look at the front A-arm, is the inside noticably lower then the outside? If the answer is "yes", then your car is too low. If you want it that low, you need to use RSR style front spindles to keep the geometry in the zone where it can be happy.

If you're tuning a car, it not unheard of to adjust yourself down a dead end. When that happens your best bet is to go back to your baseline settings (ie: Factory alignment settings and pressures) and start again. BTW, when you have your car cornerweighted, it's best to have it done with the car ballested in as-driven condition. This means half a tank of fuel and drivers weight in place. If you usually have a passenger, have that ballested too.

As far as adjusting the tire pressure by wear, I wouldn't do it. If you're going to do it right, use a Pyrometer. For street use I'd strongly recommend that you consider staying pretty close to the factory settings -- they really did know their stuff. Keep in mind that guys like Vic Firth (and more recently Walter Rohl) have done the test driving for Porsche.

69911e 10-22-2004 11:05 AM

If the understeer changed significantly due to the lowering of the car, I would suspect the front end may now be on the bumpstops. I have heard there was a time when Porsche put spacers above the struts due to the higher US req., if this is the case these need to be removed when the car is lowered to reasonable a height.

nhromyak 10-22-2004 04:05 PM

Thanks again for everyones replies.

I did not get the shoe polish, as myself and another Pelicanite went on a "fun-run" today. That's what my incentive was for fixing this front-end push (that I have had for two years).

Apparently, I did not listen to reason, nor the collective opinions and experience of this board before.

Just for fun, I decided to go with 29 and 32 pressures, F & R respectively COLD before I drove the car today.

OH MY GOSH! MY GOSH !! OH MY GOSH!
:eek: :rolleyes: :eek:

That was fun! :D

The front end would not howl like it did before (still howlled a little though). The whole car handled SO much better. Although it feels like a boat swaying on turn-in.

Turn-in seems reduced a little, I suspect it is because the rear-end loads up (or down) on initial turn-in. Now I see why everyone LOVES stiffer-torsion bars.

Tomorrow, if it doesn't rain here in CA, I will play around more with some shoe-polish and tire pressures.


jluetjen-
I guess I wasn't clear, my rears seemed to wear on the centers, not the inside. I do have a pyrometer, and with these pressures (freeway commutinng) My rear tire temperatures were within 10 degree from inside to center, to outside. Again, this made me think I was correct with my psi on the rear tires.

69911E -
I too thought, it maybe on the bumpstops. So, I took the shocks off the inner fender tower, and confirmed the shocks will go about another 2 inches further than my "at-rest" tire heights on the A-arm.

But again, it looks like it was (is) a tire pressure problem.

WOW! What a difference a day makes!

Thanks again to all the Pelicanites here!

BTW: My friend and I swapped cars, he has Kuhmo Ectsas with 205/55 and 245/45 on 16" BBS rims. The kuhmos are definately a harder riding tire, he was at 24 all the way around, after we were driving up at 8,000ft level with snow, and wet spots on the ground, so I am not sure how "hot" the tires were.

"Hot" pressures for me (again it was cold about 50 degrees outside) were 29 and 32 F & R. Since this is about the same as my cold tire pressure, I suspect the tire kept cooling down when we hit the water or little bits of snow.

I have new pics, if anyone is interested in some Freshly laid snow in the Sierras!.

Thanks again to EVERYONE for responding!

stlrj 10-23-2004 05:42 AM

Nick,

My ride is a 74 w/SC flares and an 86 3.2, 6" Design 90's front and rear with 215 60 16's on all corners, 30 psi f/r, stock bars, rear sway bar removed.

A little off subject, but my turquoise 63 VW beetle "Herbie" came stock with over 1 degree positive camber in front and rear, skinny 165 SR 15 tires, tiny front sway bar, no rear sway, was very nimble, fun to drive, could run circles around any 911 in a lot just like that mini Cooper video, never pushed or squeeled around turns.

Anyone remember the camber compenstors they used to put on the rear swing axles to keep them from tucking in and rolling over? I think they put them on 356's too.

Joe


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:37 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2025 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Pelican Parts Website


DTO Garage Plus vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.