![]() |
|
|
|
Stranger on the Internet
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Bradenton, FL
Posts: 3,244
|
PP
I think you need to check the factory specs for alignment, and adjust from that baseline. How did you get your alignment precise to those numbers? Did you change the ride height when you changed the tires (larger diameter tires)? My novice opinion is that if you have a Mustang that handles better than that Cab, you have a problem. Pat
__________________
Patrick E. Keefe 78 SC |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
|
Actually, I'm running the Fuzions in back (245/45/16) - and only on 7" Fuchs. They are fine - nice and stiff.
The only reason they're 245's is because they were on the Fuchs when I bought them recently, but I like them.
__________________
'84 Carrera Coupe - B&B Headers and one-out muffler; K&N Cone intake; Steve Wong Chip; Euro height and corner balanced; 171K Miles (9/12) |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 17
|
Air PRESSURE
Mushy unresponsive feeling SOLVED!
Are ya ready: tire pressure too high. This morning I brought it down to 29/31 lbs Just with this difference in air pressure the car responds immediately. These tires are sensitive to air pressure. YE-HAW ![]() ![]() __________________________________________________ _ Anyone have a recommendation on sizing sway bars for front and rear? I have new HD Bilsteins in front and new yellow Koni's in the rear. I would like to have a nice matched set. Thoughts? If I'm asking to many annoying questions, please let me know! I'll stop. ![]() |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: So. Calif.
Posts: 19,910
|
Matched set of shocks or sway bars?
Not sure this combination is in the archives. If you stay with one brand (of either), there's lots of info in the records according to your car and driving conditions. Sherwood |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Michigan
Posts: 14,093
|
Thanks for the easy to understand tips on this method, guys.
I did mine last weekend and found that I had a serious problem with the rear height even though it looked great and was set evenly. I was experiencing front wheel lockup on braking and a strange pull. It took me several times to get the rear where I wanted it and the front was close. The car is incredible now. It really feels totally different. The pull is gone and it brakes almost perfectly straight. The whole car just feels like it's working as it should. I believe the problem was the DS rear was not weighted properly with not much "downforce" to the wheel. Another benefit is that when exiting a left hand corner the DS wheel doesn't just turn to smoke. You can feel both tires diggin in and she just squast and goes. Sweet. I'm just embarrased that I hadn't tried this method before now. Thanks again!!!
__________________
1981 911SC ROW SOLD - JULY 2015 Pacific Blue Wayne Last edited by Oh Haha; 09-10-2008 at 05:33 PM.. |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Asheville, NC
Posts: 1,415
|
Quote:
Hey guys, just wanted to update everyone that a couple months ago I asked my mechanic to place my car on the scales as I have always been curious how close my weights were after using the tripod method several years ago. Well, the cross weights were within 25lbs!!! He told me that he struggles to get them that close using scales. Obviously, I was a bit lucky, but I think that proves that the tripod method works. The key is lifting your car in as close to the center as possible at each end. Good luck to others that will try this.
__________________
Gone but not forgotten - 1980 Porsche 911SC w/ -22mm/28mm Torsion Bars | Custom Valved Bilsteins | 22mm/21mm Carrera Sway Bars | Elephant Poly/Bronze Bushings | Carrera Brakes | AJ-USA Brake Cooling | Carrera Oil Cooler w/ Fan | Elephant Strut Brace | Oh, and no ABS or PSM or A/C |
||
![]() |
|
![]() |
Registered
|
reviving this thread to life as i just did this tripod method last weekend.
don't know if it's placebo effect or not but i think the car drives much better. feels like all four tires sticking on the ground much better. i measured the height rear and front both at the torsion bar covers. got L-R within 2mm. when i measure the fender height, L-R is much more different...like 5+mm. i hope it's because the car is 26 yrs old...i'd try not to worry unless someone tells me i should. I have questions: Q1: when i was tripod'ing, i did not take the wheels off. So i was measuring the height at slight more angle than when you'd take the wheels off and level the car to normal ride height. should i worry about it? Q2: I also did not loosen the sway bars at the drop link. got lazy about that. should i worry? Q3: I also got lazy and was lifting the car at the front condenser protection bar. I had 2x4 across the length of the bar so i did try to distribute the weight across the bar but would it be too risky? if someone damaged the car this way, please let me know. To lift the car at the center, i had a slit at the center of this 2x4 and had 3/8 extension bar - 10 inch long - between the 2x4 and the jack pad. happy friday!
__________________
1984 911 Carrera Coupe - 32C #73 - M64/05 1998 E36 M3 4dr 2006 Sienna 5dr - the hauler 2004 Lexus GX470 2010 Cannondale Caffeine II - Lefty |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: So. Calif.
Posts: 19,910
|
Q1: Method is not to set ride height but to eliminate the opposite end from affecting the other end while observing each corner. You want LF and RF to be the same/close. Same objective at the rear. You can always rotate the torsion bar adjuster(s) to set front ride height.
Q2: I would have disconnected one drop link first. It's better to have adjustable drop links, but if the front corners are the same, no problem. Q3: The condenser protection bar mounts onto the front torsion bar cover, yes? Not sure how many times you can lift from there without fatiguing the bar brackets. To lift the front end from the center of the vehicle, I permanently stacked aluminum spacers (~1x10" flat stock) on the sheet metal cover of the crossmember, enough to span the normal space between it and the crossmember. Lifting at the cover now lifts the front end at the crossmember. When lifting, use a wooden block on top of the floor jack. If the car sits too low, use another jack at the side receptacle - take it high enough to slide the floor jack underneath. All you gotta do is lift high enough to some air space under each tire. Or use a length of 2x4 spanning both front torsion bar covers, then lift at the center. Sherwood |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
|
@Sherwood,
thanks. makes sense. I'll try to see if i get any different measurements by disconnecting sway bar drop links tomorrow. that way should clear up my concern. to lift the front, i agree, it's way safer to use the sub frame or the torsion bar cover. i'd get another, longer 2x4 and lift it off the covers. i just need to get un-lazy and have the car drive up on ramps or something to get the jack slide underneath the 2x4. and i forgot another one to ask... Q4: do i still put some weight on the driver seat when doing tripod method? I'd have to think about how... i really want to avoid something like "hey honey could you come down to the garage for a minute please?"
__________________
1984 911 Carrera Coupe - 32C #73 - M64/05 1998 E36 M3 4dr 2006 Sienna 5dr - the hauler 2004 Lexus GX470 2010 Cannondale Caffeine II - Lefty |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: So. Calif.
Posts: 19,910
|
Q4: Yes. Place an equivalent amount of weight in the driver's area (cinder blocks, sandbags, exercise weights, etc.). The tripod method, as explained before, merely verifies front corners and rear corners are not affected by the opposite end which may have a corner out of whack.
Sherwood |
||
![]() |
|
Under the radar
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Fortuna, CA. On the Lost Coast near the Emerald Triangle
Posts: 7,129
|
I have used this method as well. I believe if you are careful it will do a good job. Of course I'm not at the top levels of racing where perfection is needed. I do regularly autocross and DE the car and It brakes and handles evenly.
I would like to share my modified method. I start by adjusting the rear torsion arms to exactly the same angle with the rear jacked up. Then check to make sure they are still at the same angle with the rear on the ground and the front jacked up. I then go on to adjusting the front.
__________________
Gordon ___________________________________ '71 911 Coupe 3,0L outlawed #56 PCA Redwood Region, GGR, NASA, Speed SF Trackrash's Garage :: My Garage |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Sacramento
Posts: 7,269
|
A couple of thoughts.
Some time ago Chuck at ER suggested in a thread here of doing the tripod method from the sides. This just uses the normal jack holes. He suggested removing the wheels from the side jacked. Then measure from the point near the torsion bar ends to the ground. Then do the opposite side and look for the same measurements. With the distance between the wheels being greater I would suspect it could be a little more accurate. It should be noted that alignment can have an effect on ride height. Caster to some degree and camber can affect it a far amount. I got my car close using the tripod method, then had it aligned. Then I went for my finish corner balance but was careful to maintain my original heights as alignment will change with height changes. Of course air pressure must be checked and the sway bar disconnected or it will fight the balanceing efforts. |
||
![]() |
|
![]() |
Registered
|
Chuck M's method sounds interesting. With this, the height measurements, if I understood it correctly, have to be done by subtracting the hub center to floor length from torsion bar cover to floor length, correct?
I went back doing the tripod again. This time, I disconnected the rear sway bar drop link. Also, took the wheels off up front and tried to lower the car. my findings were: sway bar was not affecting the measurements as there seems to be no or very small pre-load on the sway. but i feel good i found this out. another finding was that the taking wheels off to get the angle close to flat was not affecting the measurement results. this was also suggested by Sherwood and I just went doing experimenting this to convince myself. front, as i have stock sway, i just left the sway alone as many suggested. This is good enough for me for now for a DD with occasional DE car. I went on to measure alignment (toe, camber) using strings and had interesting observations. I'll post questions in another appropriate thread.
__________________
1984 911 Carrera Coupe - 32C #73 - M64/05 1998 E36 M3 4dr 2006 Sienna 5dr - the hauler 2004 Lexus GX470 2010 Cannondale Caffeine II - Lefty |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Sacramento
Posts: 7,269
|
If your tire pressures are accurate you probably do not have to subtract the hub center. Just measure up to the chassis from the ground.
On a couple of 911's I did the front and back method. With the sway connected it seemed that any adjustment seemed to not have the sensitivity to adjustment I expected. Again, the sway bar can fight you. There is a gauge called a Hydraulic Wheel Load Checker I read about here before. I suspect with this approach we can check our balance without disconnecting the sway bar. See: Hydraulic Wheel Load Checker Corner balance without scales??? |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
|
when you are lifting by the side jack points, how do you ensure you are lifting to the same height left and right? I'm trying to envision how this method works. So, you lift by the right jack point to a certain height. you go to the left side and measure the height of torsion bar covers front and rear respectively. you come back to the right, lower the car, go back to the left, jack up at the point to raise the left side - but by how much? then you go to the right side and measure the torsion bar covers front and rear respectively. you compare the readings from left and right and adjust heights accordingly. am i making sense or am i missing something? when you do this, you have to ensure you are lifting the side by the equal amount to compare apples to apple. how am i ensuring this?
i might be picturing something totally wrong... help... :-)
__________________
1984 911 Carrera Coupe - 32C #73 - M64/05 1998 E36 M3 4dr 2006 Sienna 5dr - the hauler 2004 Lexus GX470 2010 Cannondale Caffeine II - Lefty |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: So. Calif.
Posts: 19,910
|
Quote:
Sherwood |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
|
Quote:
this totally makes sense!
__________________
1984 911 Carrera Coupe - 32C #73 - M64/05 1998 E36 M3 4dr 2006 Sienna 5dr - the hauler 2004 Lexus GX470 2010 Cannondale Caffeine II - Lefty |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Sacramento
Posts: 7,269
|
If you leave the sway bar connected and lift by the rear it is going to effect things to.
Myself, I would not attempt any balancing efforts using any method with out disconnecting the sway bar. The exception might be with the wheel lift gauge I noted. Still, better to disconect. As to lifting height from the side, you probably just want to make sure both sides are lifted the same amount off the ground. If you are off an inch on one side it probably is not going to effect your ground to chassis measurement on the side being worked on. I think the wheel base is almost 90 inches and the wheel width at the center of the tires is about 55 inches. Thus, I would think lifting from the side would be more accurate as the balance is spread over a wider stance. On top of that each wheel is adjusted for a specific value, not a balance on a car that is not balanced to begin with. I have to say I have not tried the side balancing method. I have tried the front/ rear method and it just did not feel that sensitive to adjustment. Especially when doing the front. However, I did not put anything under the tires so they could slip to keep them from introducing side load that might have an effect. I did push up and down on the fenders with my adjustment efforts to overcome sticktion but the final result seemed a guess at best. With the side method and using a floor jack, I suspect there would be little worry about the tires and maybe even the bushings loading up and effecting one's efforts. Still not a match for a set of corner balance scales and adjustable sway bar drop links. |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Sacramento
Posts: 7,269
|
Quote:
One's wheel spring rate is a combination of mostly the torsion bar and the sway bar. On the 86 and later cars the front torsion bar is about 19mm and the sway bar is 22mm. I belive the front sway bar becomes half of the front's spring rate. This could be a big effect. At rest it might be possible to have a car look balanced with the torsion bar adjusted say +50 lbs heavy and the sway bar -50 lbs light. On a set of scales or if lifted by the center of the opposite end the car might look balanced. However, take that same car and lift one wheel say 3" and test it's load and then the other sides the same amount and test its load and the difference should then probably show up. This is why I wonder if we can leave the sways attached using this method more so that any other approach. Still better to disconect the sways when ever ballancing. Last edited by 911st; 11-18-2010 at 06:45 AM.. |
||
![]() |
|