![]() |
My Euro SC had only one option......auto heating.
Weird, huh? |
MFI
|
I agree, remove weight and add HP ;)
72, no A/C, sunroof, power anything, RS bumpers with 3.0/SSI/2in2 Dansk, 915 with 7:31 posi. The reason I wanted an earlier model was the 1) road feel 2) weight 3) no CA emissions. I did like the almost bulletproof 3.0 and the relative ease of install, so I opted for the 3.0. It is certainly fast however the combination of the gearing and CIS kinda mean quick shifts and short power bursts than a carbed cammed engine. I am still going to go the route of a supercharger i think cuz the motor has less than 35k and has all the upgrades. Most people don't appreciate the drive however and so I drive solo a lot and hope to make it out to one of the SF bay area shindigs soon......enjoy the board. Cliff |
I put or Modify...!
A better Fuel Injection System lets' say "Motronics" A relayable and better Top for the Targa let's say like the one used in the 914 not the colapsable pis o*&%#$&_)$#! A real nice AC A more relayble wiring VicSmileWavy |
Quote:
As was, Porsche believed if a driver couldn't make do with 180 hp., there was something else he or she was doing wrong with the car, like not cornering it correctly, braking, etc. I remember reading this in a R&T review of the 1983 SC. Many have said these motors have more than enough power. That it's the weight that pins them down, especially with the US cars. |
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:31 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2025 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Pelican Parts Website