![]() |
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 546
|
Negative camber and compliments to Elephant Racing
Just got an update from my shop regarding the alignment setting in my suspension revamp. Installed Chuck's decambered ball joints (and his polybronze bushings) and got an inital reading of :
Front -1.0 and -1.9 Rear -2.0 and -2.0 My mechanic then modified the left strut (can't remember what he said he did) and managed to get half a degree more: Front now at -1.5 and -1.9 He said unforetunately as my '85 911 was hand built there is a lot of variation on the chassis of individual cars. Apparantly if they could line up to 0 degrees +/- 0.5 then they were cleared to pass inspection. This type of chassis discrepancy is unforetunately common.....a "Friday" as opposed to a "Monday" car. He stated how impressed he was with Chuck's product as I'd be lucky to get -0.5 up front without them! Foretunately the corner balancing went well with quite even numbers all around (perhaps they started to build it on Friday and finished on Monday....:-) ) I asked him what we could do to balance out the front more and perhaps ideas for future gains in higher negative camber numbers. He talked about a minor increase with camber plates/strut brace but felt without major chassis modification in a jig to straighten my car I was unlikely to gain much more in terms of -ve camber on the left side for a more even setting. At the moment he's leaving it as he has set it stating the small discrepancy was inconsequential. Any opinions on wheither I should leave it or drop the right side to even both up to -1.5? Simon
__________________
85' Carrera 3.2 02' Mazda MX5 |
||
![]() |
|