|
|
|
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Sunny San Diego
Posts: 210
|
In the process of dropping the engine to do the top end and cam swap. First step was to take some numbers. Here's how it faired...
3 - 115 psi 6 - 119 psi 2 - 125 psi 5 - 119 psi 1 - 108 psi 4 - 115 psi The plugs (NGK forgot the temp code) look really good except: #2 plug was a little white on the electrode #4 plug was a tiny bit wet and more carbon around the threads So what do you think is up with #1 and #2 cylinders? What needs to be done while I have the top end out? Thanks. David |
||
|
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Sunny San Diego
Posts: 210
|
Anyone please? Bueller?
|
||
|
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Marysville Wa.
Posts: 22,483
|
the valve grind should take care of that, unless some rings are broken, or pistons/cylinders scored. pull off the jugs when you have the heads off.
__________________
https://www.instagram.com/johnwalker8704 8009 103rd pl ne Marysville Wa 98270 206 637 4071 |
||
|
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 770
|
What kind of compression numbers and % variance are acceptable for a 911 turbo?
|
||
|
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Sunny San Diego
Posts: 210
|
I'm not sure what are acceptable numbers. I think what you really want to look at is the variance because different people use different compression test techniques, tools, temperature of engine when test was taken, elevation, etc...
I'm concerned with the variance of #1 and #2 cylinders. I even tested the readings many times and had same results. I think I'll take John Walker's advice and not guess until I take the camshaft housing off. But before that, I'm also going to do a leak down test when the engine is out to see if I hear anything strange. |
||
|
|
|
|
Smart quod bastardus
|
I don't understand the concern if you are dropping the engine to do a swap on top end anyway. The variance is a little off but not badly. Usually within 10% of each other is acceptable. Are you sure the valves were adjusted properly so that none are too tight?
Was the throttle open fully when testing. Were all the plugs removed to get a quick engine rpm at turnover with the starter motor?These will all effect compression readings. Sounds like reasonable values to me as well.
__________________
1979 930 Turbo....3.4L, 7.5to1 comp, SC cams, full bay intercooler, Rarlyl8 headers, Garret GTX turbo, 36mm ported intakes, Innovate Auxbox/LM-1, custom Manually Adjustable wastegate housing (0.8-1.1bar),--running 0.95 bar max ---"When you're racing it's life! Anything else either before or after, is just waiting" |
||
|
|
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Sunny San Diego
Posts: 210
|
Thanks for the assurance Fred. The valves haven't been adjusted yet. I just took unmolested readings. Adjusting the valves will be done with the cam swap.
All the plugs were removed and settings taken at WOT. Cranked it over 12 x. I'll report back once I perform a leak down test.
__________________
David Nguyen 1987 930: 2700 lbs, 408 RWHP/405 RWTQ 930 pics: http://alturl.com/899f9 930 Engine rebuild pics: http://alturl.com/25qcy |
||
|
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Sweden
Posts: 5,911
|
I bet you'll find bunch of carbon deposits on pistons once you take off the heads. Readings look OK.
__________________
Thank you for your time, |
||
|
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: San Diego
Posts: 4,876
|
As a data point, my 930 was tested with 30k miles:
compression was 125 and leakdown was 2% across all cylinders |
||
|
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Sunny San Diego
Posts: 210
|
Hey Beep,
Why do you think there will be a lot of carbon deposits? Is it because of the low compression #s? Wouldn't carbon buildup increase compression? TY. David
__________________
David Nguyen 1987 930: 2700 lbs, 408 RWHP/405 RWTQ 930 pics: http://alturl.com/899f9 930 Engine rebuild pics: http://alturl.com/25qcy |
||
|
|
|
|
Author of "101 Projects"
|
Read this:
http://www.pelicanparts.com/techarticles/mult_Engine_Rebuild/mult_engine_rebuild-1.htm -Wayne
__________________
Wayne R. Dempsey, Founder, Pelican Parts Inc., and Author of: 101 Projects for Your BMW 3-Series • 101 Projects for Your Porsche 911 • How to Rebuild & Modify Porsche 911 Engines • 101 Projects for Your Porsche Boxster & Cayman • 101 Projects for Your Porsche 996 / 997 • SPEED READ: Porsche 911 Check out our new site: Dempsey Motorsports |
||
|
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Sunny San Diego
Posts: 210
|
OK. Finally got the P&Cs off as part of my rebuild. I found the cause of low compression for #1. The 2nd compression ring is broken. The rest of the rings look in good shape. I'll measure the ring gap later tonight.
Question is when I get the new compression ring, do I need to do anything else such as re-hone to #1? Since I'm only replacing one ring out of three, I'm hopping I can just re-clock the rings and I'm set. #5 and #6 had a lot of oil on the exhaust valves. Further inspection of the positioning of the oil rings, they were pointed down at 6 and 7 o'clock vs. 12 o'clock and the compression ring gaps were more inline vs. 180 degrees apart. Can the positioning of the ring gap normally rotate with time? Or once it's set, it's likely not to rotate? Things I'm doing: - ARP studs - ARP rod bolts - 964 cams - port intake/manifold/plenum to 36mm - headers - custom full bay IC - full head job (valves/springs/seats/regrind) Thanks, David
__________________
David Nguyen 1987 930: 2700 lbs, 408 RWHP/405 RWTQ 930 pics: http://alturl.com/899f9 930 Engine rebuild pics: http://alturl.com/25qcy |
||
|
|
|
|