![]() |
|
|
|
Registered
|
![]()
I am in the process of gathering bits and pieces for a tranny rebuild and clutch replacement for my SC. For "just a few dollars more" I can replace the stock clutch with the higher performance Sachs clutch assembly with an aluminum pressure plate. Any thoughts on the pros and cons of using the aluminum pp vs the cast iron pp?
Also, need recommendations for an east coast (time, shipping costs, etc.) transmission rebuilder.
__________________
FEC3 1980 911SC coupe "Zeus" 3.3SS god of thunder and lightning |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
|
I recommend the lighter combination unless the wife has to drive it. The lighter aluminum plate will give snappier response but does require a little more feness to manage. Any time I can knock a pound or two off the total curb weight, I take advantage. I think it's worth it.
__________________
'77 930 turbo Garretson I/C 1 BAR spring, (2) '82 Triumph Bonneville Royal Wedding Edition Past rides: '74 914 1.9 liter twin plugged track car, '83 928S, '87 924S, '75 911S w '78 ROW 3.0, '72 911T, '70 911T and various other insignificant domestic examples. Happiness is a grey tailpipe! Turbo lag......it's worth the wait! |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
|
Quote:
__________________
If it flows, it goes. If its smooth, it moves. Any questions? 96 993 C2 (Current) 87 911 Factory Turbo-Look Cab (Sold) 85 911 Factory Turbo-Look Targa (Gone) |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: north america
Posts: 2,228
|
Yup...Aluminum is the way to go if you want a more responsive motor.
Get a lightweight flywheel while your in there |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Peoples Republic of Long Beach, NY
Posts: 21,140
|
I always use the Al pp.
Never used the light weight flywheel due to stalling fears on a 2.7.
__________________
Ronin LB '77 911s 2.7 PMO E 8.5 SSI Monty MSD JPI w x6 |
||
![]() |
|