Pelican Parts Forums

Pelican Parts Forums (http://forums.pelicanparts.com/)
-   Porsche 911 Technical Forum (http://forums.pelicanparts.com/porsche-911-technical-forum/)
-   -   Cone Vs Flat Filter on a 3.2 (http://forums.pelicanparts.com/porsche-911-technical-forum/342525-cone-vs-flat-filter-3-2-a.html)

matty74 04-21-2007 07:38 PM

Cone Vs Flat Filter on a 3.2
 
Fabspeed have an open filter cover for a flt filter and claim that flat filters work better than pod/cone filters.

What is peoples experience with this?

Matt

Dantilla 04-21-2007 07:55 PM

The stock filter has been proven to flow more air than the engine can use. In short, the intake is not a choke point, and offers no improvement on a stock engine.

KatoKato 04-22-2007 04:01 AM

Re: Cone Vs Flat Filter on a 3.2
 
I pondered this changeover for the aesthetic and space-saving reasons as well.....

I ended up chopping off the air intake horn just leaving the square frame to hold the air filter in place.

Here's a thread that shows the piece with drill holes.

http://forums.pelicanparts.com/showthread.php?threadid=213180&highlight=airbox+mo d

It sounds great!

Cheers,
Kato



Quote:

Originally posted by matty74
Fabspeed have an open filter cover for a flt filter and claim that flat filters work better than pod/cone filters.

What is peoples experience with this?

Matt


Zef 04-22-2007 04:09 AM

The only advantage is easier access to eng components...!

KatoKato 04-22-2007 06:33 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by zefsuper911
The only advantage is easier access to eng components...!

Yes - and how sweet it is!

JTL 04-22-2007 08:20 PM

I have had a k&n cone on my 3.2 for a couple of years. Installing the cone uncluttered the right side very nicely. It is a little louder than the stock airbox. I can hear occasional suction type noises when accelerating.

In both stock airbox and cone setups the air gets pulled in basically from the engine compartment. Would it not be more beneficial to get cooler outside air with a cold air kit? I haven't seen one for a 3.2...

jt
-84 targa

Rot 911 04-23-2007 05:11 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by JTL
In both stock airbox and cone setups the air gets pulled in basically from the engine compartment. Would it not be more beneficial to get cooler outside air with a cold air kit? I haven't seen one for a 3.2...
jt
-84 targa

The air under the lid is about the same temperature as the outside air so no need for a cold air kit. At least one member of this board, maybe another, did a test with a temperature indicator under the lid to check air temps. The engine fan draws in an enormous amount of air so no much chance for the air to heat up.

Dantilla 04-23-2007 05:38 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Kurt V
one member of this board, did a test with a temperature indicator under the lid to check air temps.
I remember that thread. Found that the stock airbox draws cooler air than the cones.

JTL 04-23-2007 07:31 AM

//Found that the stock airbox draws cooler air than the cones.//

Is that because the cone intake sits in the forward corner of the engine compartment where the air could be hotter that where the stock box draws air in?
I dunno -- performance is the #1 concern but it sure is nice to get to the right side plugs more easily without the stock box in place.

jt

Wavey 04-23-2007 09:53 AM

Here are the threads:

http://forums.pelicanparts.com/porsche-911-technical-forum/72259-experimental-data-cold-air-intake.html

http://forums.pelicanparts.com/showthread.php?threadid=241938&perpage=20&pagenumb er=1


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:15 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2025 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Pelican Parts Website


DTO Garage Plus vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.