![]() |
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 140
|
901 R&P math problem
I just replaced the ring and pinion in my 901 transmission. I built a tool (thanks to Jim Williams) that allows me to measure the distance from the center line of the differential to the face of the pinion shaft. Now that I have the measurement I'm a little confused on what the measurement is I should be striving for.
The data I read off from the pinion shaft and ring gear are as follows: Pinion Shaft: 01037 -0.19 3.65 Ring Gear: 01037 0.15 +0.30 On page R43 of the factory manual it shows a diagram where E is the distance from the center line of the differential to the face of the pinion shaft. On page R23 of the manual it states "Determine the adjustment value E from the blueprint value R = 63.50 by adding or subtracting the value of machined deviation r which is marked on the pinion face." I would take this to mean that E = 63.50 - 0.19 or E = 63.31 It goes on to say "A basic approximation value (based on averages) of 64.70 mm makes it possible to predetermine the spacer thickness required. The difference between adjustment value E and the approximation value (64.70 mm) indicates the spacer thickness needed." In my case then the required thickness of spacers = 64.70 - 63.31 = 1.39 mm On page R 42 it shows the etchings on the pinion shaft and ring gear. For the pinion shaft: 1. Deviation r = -0.19 (?) 2. Mating Number = 01037 For the Ring Gear: 2. Mating number = 01037 3. Backlash = 0.15 Now, one question is what are the additional etchings on the pinion shaft and ring gear not mentioned in the manual. I believe 3.65 on the pinion shaft is the date of manufacture (March 1965). The number +0.30 on the ring gear is really confusing to me. If this is really deviation r (which I've heard it might be), then what is -0.19 on the pinion shaft? So, what should my measurement read from the C/L of the differential to the face of the pinion shaft? 1. 63.50 - 0.19 - = 63.31 2. 63.50 + 0.30 = 63.80 3. 63.50 - 0.19 + 0.30 = 63.61 4. 63.50 5. something else? Thanks for your help in advance. Rob ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 140
|
OK, I know there are some 901 experts out there to help me with my problem. Maybe they haven't read my post. Does anyone know any 901 experts that I can send my message directly to?
Thanks in advance. Rob |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Kailua, Bend, & Tamarack
Posts: 1,618
|
Take a poll. I'm guessing
#2. 63.50 + 0.30 = 63.80 I have no guess about the -0.19 Personally, I'd go with 63.80, set the backlash at .15 (.006"), and check the mesh with bluing. |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 140
|
Thanks for your input Geary.
Rob |
||
![]() |
|