![]() |
+1 for worn bushings. After replacement, 1st and 2nd are still resistant, but shifting is much more precise.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
and speaking of gearboxes probably in need of a rebuild.. :rolleyes: is yours holding together Jack? |
I had a full rebuild ++ built around a 3.4L future install.
glad i went that way instead of a G-50 |
I have never driven with one but... my guess is that if you could get a WEVO dog box, it would be the cat's pajamas. I have raced against them, and they are advantageous compared to a normal 915. But it will cost you. Not sure whether they are available any more as new though.
Another approach was taken by one of our local racers... he rigged up an EMCO (used in DP cars). Not cheap. Anothe route is to just buy a modern Porsche factory race car and put the parts in your street car. Maybe not practical. |
Quote:
Yep, guitars and cars and wheelin down that long lonesome highway ! SmileWavy Sounds like from everyone's advice that a bushing kit is money well spent. I forgot to mention, 3rd gear is kind of funky to find at times as well. |
Quote:
|
Another comment about non-sycnchro transmissions whether sequential or not: most of them are racing oriented and therefore close ratio, so less difference in gear speeds during shifts and less 'need' for synchros.
I remember the first drive I had in a '79 SC in about '80 or '81, so a pretty new car. I could not believe how nicely it shifted, I came out of british stuff which shifts pretty nicely, but even if the 911 had longer throws than my MGB, it just had a beautiful feel. I remember shifting it just to feel it. I also remember mid '80s BMWs having very slick feel. |
Quote:
:D http://hargettprecision.com/index.php?cPath=35 http://forums.pelicanparts.com/uploa...1184764456.jpg |
Also, replace your tranny and engine mounts, perhaps with sprotier versions. Keeping everything lined up with the linkage made a big difference for me!
|
Good discussion.
A feature of a sequential transmission (like a bike) is you CAN’T skip gears. This means every gear change has minimum rpm difference. With only slight power interruption (many use an ignition/fuel interruption system), there doesn’t even have to be de-clutching or lifting on the throttle. I agree about straight cut gears, they are too noisy for normal street use. The choice of straight cut gears (noisy but strong) compared to the various angle cut gear forms doesn’t have anything to do with the choice of engagement (dog, syncro, etc.) Some later G50 types (G64 …Japanese G97/01) have changed the syncro angle (to 15°) to reduce the effectiveness and allowing faster (sequential) shifting. I understand some electric systems have 2 mS shifting. I think the auto industry is going away from automatic transmissions with clutches, planetary gears and torque converters. It seems the choice is regular mechanical transmissions (10+ speeds), dog engagement (no syncros), electric shifting (sub-millisecond) and all computer controlled. I think the reason is fuel efficiency and emissions - AND it gets everything under the control of the computer. I think the RS Spyder may lead here. Best, Grady |
I agree Grady. The systems with 2 clutches, such as the VW DSG tranny, with one always engaged is appears to be the future of transmissions.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dual-clutch_gearbox |
Helical dogboxes are popular with the Subaru crowd. Quiet for cruising at the cost of some gear strength, but fast shifting.
|
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:59 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2025 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Pelican Parts Website