Pelican Parts Forums

Pelican Parts Forums (http://forums.pelicanparts.com/)
-   Porsche 911 Technical Forum (http://forums.pelicanparts.com/porsche-911-technical-forum/)
-   -   964 compression test results (http://forums.pelicanparts.com/porsche-911-technical-forum/383134-964-compression-test-results.html)

Brother 12-18-2007 07:20 PM

964 compression test results
 
Cylinder psi leakdown
1 190 5%
2 195 8%
3 190 5%
4 195 8%
5 198 8%
6 195 5%


Are these numbers good, or are they the beginning of the end of this 964? It is a 93 with 107,000+ miles.

Bill Douglas 12-18-2007 07:30 PM

:)

Eagledriver 12-18-2007 09:30 PM

It's not even the beginning of the beginning for your engine.

-Andy

David E. Clark 12-19-2007 06:44 AM

If you are really worried about this, don't! These numbers are fine - actually a little better than fine. The most important factor in a compression test is consistency between cylinders. A good rule of thumb is to have no more than 10% variance between the cylinders. You are looking great in this regard with about a max of 4% between 1 and 5. Good cylinder leakdown readings should be below 8%. You are on the high end here but that is by no means "the beginning of the end". You've got many, many miles before you'll need a rebuild. If I were you I'd just drive and not worry about it. After all, what else is there to do in Del Rio! I spent a summer there in 1983 doing an Air Force training program. It was a pretty sleepy place back then. Merry Christmas. <O:p</O:p

DW SD 12-19-2007 07:30 AM

I think 1% to 3% hot leakdown is ideal. These numbers, especially bundled with compression results are acceptable.
Oil consumption rate would tell you more about necessity for top end rebuild. Is that info available? I would not assume because you have acceptable compression and leak down that you are not in need of valve guides.

Not trying to scare you, but I bought a non running 3.6, which was supposedly rebuilt. I had to pay for a complete rebuild again. Proceed with caution.

Doug

EarlyPorsche 12-19-2007 08:33 AM

After that many miles, producing those numbers means they were well maintained miles. This would indicate proper driving, oil changes, and warm up cycles. I would say its unreasonable to find any better numbers on a 110,000 mile engine.

Brother 12-20-2007 07:01 PM

The car is immaculate. These numbers are from a car I'm considering buying.

I'm moving to CA this summer so I know I'll have more choices out there. I don't know if this is the best time to buy though. Have you seen house prices in CA!

cstreit 12-20-2007 08:53 PM

The compression numbers look darn good. The leakdown isn't spectacular, but certainly not anywhere near a deal-breaker situation. They are consistent, that's the main thing, and you don't know how accurate the testers gauge was either. Higher than 8% and I'd start to do some more homework....

Jeff Alton 12-20-2007 09:49 PM

The leakdown numbers are fine. I would concern myself more with where the leak is occuring.

Also, was the motor warm, hot, cold? This also plays into the equation. If you pay for a leakdown, and the shop/mechanic does not tell you where the leaking is occuring, kindly ask for your money back.....

Cheers

Ole Petter 12-21-2007 05:53 AM

Compression and leak-down tests
 
I had a friend help me doing compression-tests on my old 2.7. The compression on all cylinders was 9:1 and it came straight up, it didn't need the engine to turn several times to get there... My friend was wery impressed by this, but this is by no means a leak-down test, what is the difference?

And if the compression on all cylinders is even and good, can there still be problems?


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:43 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2025 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Pelican Parts Website


DTO Garage Plus vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.