Pelican Parts
Parts Catalog Accessories Catalog How To Articles Tech Forums
Call Pelican Parts at 888-280-7799
Shopping Cart Cart | Project List | Order Status | Help



Go Back   Pelican Parts Forums > Porsche Forums > Porsche 911 Technical Forum


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread
Author
Thread Post New Thread    Reply
Registered
 
M491Cabriolet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: East Coast USA - Tysons, VA
Posts: 1,232
Camshafts and pistons

Hello! I was wondering if camshafts with the part number "901 105 183 OR" and a Bosch distributor with the part number 0.231.169.011 are OEM 911S parts. Any advice would be greatly appreciated.

Also, I was wondering if anyone might know what effect rebuilding a 911T 2.4 engine with 2.2 911E pistons and camshafts would have. Would this be a positive step in terms of performance and compression? I know 2.2S pistons would lincrease the compression substantially from the stock 7.5 of the T pistons.

Another option I have instead of the 2.2E pistons is to use 2.4 911S pistons and E camshafts. I also have the above cams, but am afraid the drivability (99.9% on the street) would suffer. Anyway, I don't know which would be better.

Also, would the use of the above distributor on my stock or modified 911T engine provide any improvement?

Final question... Would any of the above modifications on a engine needing a rebuild anyway negatively impact the value of my 1972 911T coupe?

Any help would be greatly appreciated! Thanks in advance.

Old 01-22-2008, 05:13 PM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #1 (permalink)
Home of the Whopper
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Rocky Top, TN
Posts: 6,910
Garage
2.2E pistons will give a higher cr than 2.4S pistons, about 9.1 vrs 8.5. With E cams will be an absolute rocket. If anybody drives the car they will not be able to wipe the smile off their face long enough to talk about any negative impact on value. These are 'simple' bolt ons that can easily be converted back if a future buyer wants a slower, original car. Do it!!
__________________
1968 912 coupe
1971 911E Targa rustbucket
1972 914 1.7
1987 924S
Old 01-22-2008, 05:48 PM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #2 (permalink)
Registered
 
M491Cabriolet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: East Coast USA - Tysons, VA
Posts: 1,232
So lemme get this right...

So lemme get this right... I don't understand something... Because the 1972 and 1973 911S had a lower, 8.5:1 compression ratio than earlier cars, are 2.4S cars less of a kick in the pants to drive than the earlier cars? See, I've never driven an S. I used to have a 1972 911E coupe, though. So, my idea is to use 2.4S pistons with E cams and MFI. I know the MFI may need tweaking, but I'll worry about that later. Does this sound as good to anyone else as it does to me? I also have a set of cams I believe are OEM S cams, but am heavily leaning toward opting for the E cams to make the car more all-around-fun to drive. Would the addition of an S distributor give me any benefit?

Also related to the above, I'm really interested to know if anyone knows if camshafts with the part number "901 105 183 OR" and a Bosch distributor with the part number 0.231.169.011 are OEM 911S parts.

Thanks very much for all your advice.
Old 01-23-2008, 09:22 AM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #3 (permalink)
Registered
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Kansas City
Posts: 719
Not necessarily. The 2.4S still had 10 more HP, but a longer stroke motor so a little different character. Tomato, tomotto as they say. A common upgrade for the 2.4S motor is to swap 2.2S pistons thereby raising compression and adding a few more HP. As said above, 2.2E pistons will even raise the compression a bit versus 2.4S pistons. I'd only do that if I had 2.2E pistons on hand. If you've got to buy some you might as well go 2.2S pistons and E cams.

Not sure about the distributor but I'd match that more with the cams than by piston choice. I'd guess the advance curves are more in line with the cam's lobe than anything to do with compression. So an S cams is going to work better with an S distributor curve and so on.

Bill
__________________
Current: 1975 911S --Chocolate brown
Past:
1967 911S --Bahama Yellow
1990 C2 Targa --Silver
1973 914 2.0 --Delphi Green
Old 01-23-2008, 10:11 AM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #4 (permalink)
Home of the Whopper
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Rocky Top, TN
Posts: 6,910
Garage
I seem to remember all the 2.4 dizzies have the same advance curve.

The cam is a left side S cam from a 911/53 engine. The right side should have a different number.

__________________
1968 912 coupe
1971 911E Targa rustbucket
1972 914 1.7
1987 924S
Old 01-23-2008, 05:32 PM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #5 (permalink)
Reply


 


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:17 PM.


 
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2025 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page
 

DTO Garage Plus vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.