Pelican Parts Forums

Pelican Parts Forums (http://forums.pelicanparts.com/)
-   Porsche 911 Technical Forum (http://forums.pelicanparts.com/porsche-911-technical-forum/)
-   -   Hello, New to the 911 experience! (http://forums.pelicanparts.com/porsche-911-technical-forum/427931-hello-new-911-experience.html)

N11Porsche 09-01-2008 04:04 PM

Not sure how familiar you are with the differences from the mid-years to the SC's & Carrera's. The mid-year Porshes are referred to as "narrow body" cars. I don't care for that look but you may. Starting with the SC's the bodies had fender flares in the front & back. They also had galvanized bodies which reduces the chances of rust. The SC's have a 3.0 liter engine which is considered by most, to be a much-more reliable engine than the earler engines. Not uncommon to get 300k miles out of a 3.0 motor. When I sold my SC it was approaching 200k miles and I took it to redline every time I drove it. Didn't smoke or burn any oil. (It did leave oil on the floor).

Whatever your cup of tea, take your time, the wrong car can be a money pit. Well the right car can too, but it's much more fun!

Good Luck on the pursuit.....

klrskies 09-01-2008 04:33 PM

Thanks for the info.

Were the 3.0's in the SC Aluminum? I like the wide body, just had rememberance of the 76 911s that I haven't seemed to got over!

I want to make a choioce I'll be comfortable with. If one keeps wanting something "a little better", one can end up with nothing, yes?

450knotOffice 09-01-2008 08:02 PM

The SC and Carrera with their wider rear fenders will allow you more latitude with rear wheel choices. I have a friend (a fellow Pelican - Pkaaso) who has a '74 and his biggest issue with tires is the lack of comfortable room for even 225/50 16's. The SC/Carrera will allow tires up to 265 wide with minimal - if any- massaging necessary. Some here have even gone to 275's.

RWebb 09-01-2008 09:01 PM

yes, all motors 3L and larger are Al

klrskies 09-02-2008 12:44 AM

Thanks for all the info!

One 76' 911s I've considerd has 200K miles, but had wide fender flares from a wide body welded in to address the narrow tire issue. No rust, re-painted, new seals, new polished fuchs and tires, stock drivetrain other than someone added an 11 blade fan sometime, new carpet and door panels, re-upholstered seats, clock and interior light don't work, starts and runs well, although consumes a quart of oil every 1000 miles or so, no suspension or brake work done yet, but functioning well...good price from owner who doesn't want to carry on...$6500. I was thinking, start looking for big, strong engine to install in the future, and start taking care of the "older car" issues now. Please, what else should I consider? Are the transmissions in these older cars up to handling more powerful engines? Maybe it's best to go to SC or newer, but I do like the older cars.
regards,
Ken

RWebb 09-02-2008 11:38 AM

6500 for a rust free, running car is a pretty good deal.

All the 915 tranny's (from '72-89) are of roughly equal strength - the Mg cased ones are actually better in some ways than the Al ones. Wevo makes 2 pieces to beef up these things.

There is a long thread on the best trans. and another on the various changes thru the years. IIRC, the '76 is a nice one with Mg case and early repair issues were ironed out by then (guide tube and some other things).

I don't have these threads saved so you'll have to do a search to find them. You could post them here when you do and then this thread can help the next guy...

ramonesfreak 09-02-2008 03:18 PM

..and impact bumper cars are not ugly. they are the best looking of all :D


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:06 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2025 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Pelican Parts Website


DTO Garage Plus vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.