![]() |
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 203
|
torsion bar stiffness % ??
When upgrading coil spring suspensions, it's common to refer to a new spring as xx% stiffer than the factory spring. Does anyone know the percentages for the torsion bars offered?
In the front, 22mm is what % stiffer than 19mm? In the rear, 27mm is what % stiffer than 23mm? thanks, geoff |
||
![]() |
|
She/Her
|
I'm not 100% sure, but I believe that for every mm, you increase stiffness by 4x.
__________________
Gwyneth *she/her 1995 993 Guards Red 1984 911 Targa with a G50 (RIP) |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 203
|
do you mean 4 times or 4%?
4 times is a little extreme, right? so going from 19mm to 22m would mean 1200% stiffer. |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
|
Like this:
![]()
__________________
2014 Cayman S (track rat w/GT4 suspension) 1979 930 (475 rwhp at 0.95 bar) |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Long Beach CA, the sewer by the sea.
Posts: 37,646
|
Here's an old thread from Will Ferch:
"I'm providing you with this to be an "informed consumer"... Your 86 was likely delivered with a 18.8 front bar and a 25 rear bar. The equivalent spring rates are 110 lb/in front... 140 lb/in rear. Stiffer rear ( only) will promote oversteer....stiffer front ( only) will promote understeer. Here's a breakdown of front and rear TB sizes and their spring rates, after my exhaustive investigation on sizes, bar lengths, pivot arm lengths, etc: Front: 18.8= 110 lb/in 21= 173 22=210 23=250 Rear: 24=120 lb/in 25=140 26=165 27=191 28=221 29=254 30=294 31=332 33=427 Notice some interesting trends.... many people say to upgrade to 21/27...or 22/28. The 21/27 combo equates to 173/191...and the 22/28 combo equates to 210/221. In both cases...fairly equal. This maintains the front/rear balance Porsche designed into these cars, but some say (me included) that we can go proportionately stiffer in the rear to dial-out some unwanted low speed understeer. So...maybe 21/28 ( 173/221)....or 22/29 ( 210/254). But look what you're contemplating: 21/31 ( or 173/332). IMHO...this is too much rear bar...and the overall stiffness for the rear is over 2.3 x as stiff as stock.... !" What this doesn't cover is the wheel size and offset. That factor will change the rates if not stock. |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
|
Quote:
% increase in stiffness = ( (d2^4)- (d1^4) ) / (d1^4) * 100 where d2 is new diameter and d1 is original diameter To answer your question: 19 to 22m front active rate stiffness increase as a %: 49.23228029 23 to 27mm rear active rate stiffness increase as a %: 89.90819787
__________________
-Todd '82 911 SC Coupe w/'92 3.6L, bulletproofed 915/62 w/GT LSD & Wevo goodness, Rennsport RSR/Bilstein Sport, SRP ARB, ER Polybronze, BK strut brace, 15x7/8" Fuchs. Sold: 92 964 Turbo, 81 SC, 96 993 Coupe, 82 SC, 89 Carrera Cabriolete |
||
![]() |
|
![]() |
Registered
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 203
|
thanks guy, good information.
|
||
![]() |
|
Registered
|
you better believe it,....good stuff!!
Thanks! Best, Doyle
__________________
Recording Engineer, Administrator and Entrepeneur Designer of Fine Studios, Tube Amplifier Guru 1989 Porsche 911 Carrera Coupe 25th Anniversary Special Edition Middle Georgia |
||
![]() |
|