Pelican Parts Forums

Pelican Parts Forums (http://forums.pelicanparts.com/)
-   Porsche 911 Technical Forum (http://forums.pelicanparts.com/porsche-911-technical-forum/)
-   -   2.7 to 3.2 conversion questions (http://forums.pelicanparts.com/porsche-911-technical-forum/434780-2-7-3-2-conversion-questions.html)

PcarPhil 10-11-2008 03:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by safe (Post 4231935)
I know the sender is different, 5 vs 10 bar.
But whats with the temperature sender? Is there really any difference?

I think the difference is the calibration of the temp gauge and sender. The 2.7 gauge is calibrated for the 2.7 sender and the 3.2 gauge is calibrated for the 3.2 sender.

I used the '77 2.7 temp gauge with the 3.2 sender and was getting extremely high temp readings. When I installed the 2.7 sender in the 3.2 engine the reading became normal.

cubby911T 10-11-2008 06:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kaefer (Post 4232005)
I used the '77 2.7 temp gauge with the 3.2 sender and was getting extremely high temp readings. When I installed the 2.7 sender in the 3.2 engine the reading became normal.

I actually encountered the exact opposite result. My '77 (numbered) oil temp gauge showed ridiculously high readings with the 74-76 sender. When I changed to the 77-89 sender (911-606-112-00) my readings normalized and I was able to confirm those readings by conducting a fairly simple test. Check out this thread for my testing details:

http://forums.pelicanparts.com/porsche-911-technical-forum/429344-new-3-2-running-hot-maybe.html

Scott, is it possible that your gauge is actually from a 74-76 car? I'm pretty sure my '77 gauge is original. If you look at the earlier oil temp sender description in the Pelican catalog, it does say for years 74-76 only:

http://forums.pelicanparts.com/uploa...1223736258.jpg

I can only guess that the '77 numbered gauge responds like the non-numbered gauges that came in subsequent years. At least, that's how it appears to me....

jpnovak 10-11-2008 10:13 AM

Don, great work.

3.2 CAB 10-11-2008 11:53 AM

Wow, it looks like a lot of trouble to change from a 915 to a G50. I didn't realize that it would have been that much work and fabrication needed.

+1 on the super work Don. Tony.

PcarPhil 10-11-2008 01:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cubby911T (Post 4232165)
I actually encountered the exact opposite result. My '77 (numbered) oil temp gauge showed ridiculously high readings with the 74-76 sender. When I changed to the 77-89 sender (911-606-112-00) my readings normalized and I was able to confirm those readings by conducting a fairly simple test. Check out this thread for my testing details:

http://forums.pelicanparts.com/showthread.php?t=429344

Scott, is it possible that your gauge is actually from a 74-76 car? I'm pretty sure my '77 gauge is original. If you look at the earlier oil temp sender description in the Pelican catalog, it does say for years 74-76 only:

http://forums.pelicanparts.com/uploa...1223736258.jpg

I can only guess that the '77 numbered gauge responds like the non-numbered gauges that came in subsequent years. At least, that's how it appears to me....

I dunno. I believe my numbered gauge is the stock '77 but who knows. I just know I ended up pulling the sender out of the 2.7 engine and installed it in the 3.2 engine to get correct temp readings.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:22 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2025 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Pelican Parts Website


DTO Garage Plus vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.