![]() |
|
|
|
Registered
|
![]()
I have been buying and selling cars since I was a teen in the 60's. I have pretty much stuck to the muscle cars and occasional european sports cars. I have stuck to a rule of original only cars and have done well. This is not something I do to make a living but really as a hobby because I just love cars. I have never bought a car that was restored although I have looked at many nice ones but I just like the idea of originality. Chances are when I buy something i will just do a light cleanup if that and offer the car as is. My question to you people is what do you think (Porsches only) would you rather have an original survivor in good condition or a well restored car?
![]() |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
|
I would prefer the "patina" of an original car over the pristine look of a freshly restored car.....
__________________
*2005 Markleeville "Death Ride" 5 Pass Finisher. 129 miles & 15,000 ft. of climbing *California Triple Crown Member (3 Double Centuries in 1 Year) *2003 Giant Carbon Fiber Road bike with Topolino Wheels + a lot of goodies *2000 Torelli road bike - Campagnolo Chorus equiped + a few goodies *1999 Litespeed titanium, full-suspension mountain bike Shimano XT equiped + a lot of goodies. Bill Carcot 1979 911SC - Sold (Searching for a Boxster) 2000 BMW Z3 |
||
![]() |
|
Soldier of Fortune
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 987
|
I'd prefer "well restored" = someone has already spent the $$$ and they can take the depreciation hit.
|
||
![]() |
|
zugelassener benutzer
|
You can never re-create an original car and they will always be worth more in the end. When ever you can preserve over restore. Nothing wrong with restored cars but anyone can make one, some better than others. I appreciate perfectly restored cars but always favor the patina of a survivor. I also really like resto-mod cars - it all depends on what you are looking for.......
Here's a '65 SWB a friend is considering, it has needs and a few items to make it correct but really nice. ![]() ![]() ![]()
__________________
Team Fee '86 Carrera 3.2 Coupe blk/blk, no wing 7&9x16s BFG GForce SS 205/55 & 245/50s, SW Chip, Maxspeed catbypass, B&B, Sachs Power Clutch, Turbo mounts, oil cooler scoop, RS door panels, Momo Prototipo, Rennline fully adj gas pedal & floorboard, RS replica dead pedal, Weltmeister yellow h/l lenses, factory short shift, custom speedo 32C #7 |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
|
Survivor would be the way to go for me.
__________________
63 356 2.1 Rally Coupe 75 911M 2.7 MFI 86 Sports Purpose Carrera "O4" 19 991.2 S |
||
![]() |
|
Midwest R Gruppe
|
Survivor for me too. And I've got one.
![]()
__________________
Scott 69E Coupe 2.2S LtWt 73.5T Coupe |
||
![]() |
|
![]() |
Registered
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Sacramento. CA.
Posts: 95
|
I bought mine from the original owner and boy does it have patina, rock chips, door dings and scratchs.
So I have to vote for patina!
__________________
1971 Albert Blue T Targa RG 439 ES 1056 |
||
![]() |
|
Non Compos Mentis
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Off the grid- Almost
Posts: 10,596
|
I don't care about originality, I care about the current condition on the car. I have no desire to show my cars, I like to drive the snot out of them. That's why I stuffed a 3.2 into my long-hood.
|
||
![]() |
|
Registered
|
It seems to me you guys and gals think the same as me. Original, driving and in good shape. This car had all the records, owners manual, tools, service records, keys, factory undercoat, no rust with an engine rebuild around 2k miles ago. 102K total miles and verified. I am very pleased to find a car of this caliber that is 33 years old. Yes, it does have a nice patina on original paint but I need to do something about the wheels.
![]() ![]() Now all my buddies here are asking me what it's worth and my answer is "let's go for a ride and you tell me." ![]() 1975 911S Targa |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: cooperstown NY
Posts: 894
|
depends on what you're looking for.
nice early original cars are big $. even fixer uppers cost dough. its always cheaper to buy someone else's restoration. but that's a sweet ride
__________________
bob 1972 E pos correction: expensive pos someday.... "shut up and drive!" |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Long Beach CA, the sewer by the sea.
Posts: 37,708
|
I prefer whatever costs less and has had the most spent on it. As an example, I paid 11K for my car and have receipts for at least that much work done on it within the last 4 years of the PO's ownership. And more before that.
Now, isn't that a survivor? One that has been maintained and fixed as necessary? No engine work has ever been done. |
||
![]() |
|
Detached Member
Join Date: May 2003
Location: southern California
Posts: 26,964
|
I have a totally unrestored 1930 Rudge Whitworth motorcycle. Most of it's value is from it being unrestored.
__________________
Hugh |
||
![]() |
|
![]() |
Registered
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Colorado, USA
Posts: 8,279
|
Both have their plusses and minuses.
I've had both, at extreme ends of the spectrum. Very low mileage, completely original, as it rolled from the factory, and fully restored to national concours level. I'll probably never own at either end of the extreme like that again. From now on, I only buy cars that I will drive. I enjoyed the concours stuff while I had it, but am done with it. But if I had to pick between survivor or restored, I personally would get restored. Given that it is going to be a driver, I feel more relaxed driving a car that has already had some restoration work done on it. Don't get me wrong, I LOVE seeing unrestored, original cars, and am glad people keep them that way. I just find it a little stressful, esp. when talking about 30+ year old all original paint. Hard for me to leave that parked in a modern tiny parking spot in a crowded lot, and if you can't ever park the car, it's hard for it to be a real driver. Last edited by the; 12-15-2008 at 09:59 AM.. |
||
![]() |
|