 
					|   | 
 | 
 | 
| 
 | 
| Registered Join Date: Jan 2004 Location: Sacramento 
					Posts: 7,269
				 | 
				
				kg/h = CFM = x HP???
			 
			How many kg/h dose is take to support 300hp?    I need this in kg/h please. This is way out of my knowledge and pay grade. Thank you if you can get me close please. | ||
|  01-26-2009, 03:37 PM | 
 | 
| Detached Member Join Date: May 2003 Location: southern California 
					Posts: 26,964
				 | 
			I'm guessing no one understands your question.  1 HP=33,000 foot-pounds/minute.  Are you asking how much air:gas is needed for 300 HP? You might find a start in these articles in the Tech Info Center of Pelican parts http://www.pelicanparts.com/techarticles/mult_gas_and_oil/mult_gas_faq1.htm 
				__________________ Hugh Last edited by Hugh R; 01-26-2009 at 05:24 PM.. | ||
|  01-26-2009, 05:22 PM | 
 | 
| Registered Join Date: Jan 2004 Location: Sacramento 
					Posts: 7,269
				 | 
			Please? Or how may normally aspirated HP can a MAF that flows to 800 kg/h support? Or, how many for 300 hp? | ||
|  01-26-2009, 07:07 PM | 
 | 
| Registered | 
			You should really search the site. This has all been covered ad nauseum. You are not going to get to 300HP without some serious $$ and some serious engine tweaks. My 84 puts out about 224 at the crank, this is with a SW chip, Dansk premuffler and stock muffler. A sport muffler will get me a few more HP, MAF a little more, but I will never see 300HP. This is a US spec engine. 
				__________________ Make sure to check out my balls in the Pelican Parts Catalog! 917 inspired shift knobs. '84 Targa - Arena Red - AX #104 '07 Toyota Camry Hybrid - Yes, I'm that guy... '01 Toyota Corolla - Urban Camouflage - SOLD Last edited by slodave; 01-26-2009 at 07:13 PM.. | ||
|  01-26-2009, 07:11 PM | 
 | 
| Registered Join Date: Jan 2004 Location: Sacramento 
					Posts: 7,269
				 | 
			Thanks guys I am not trying to build a 300hp motor. I am trying to size a MAF sensor. I do not know if 800 kg/f capacity sensor is good for 100hp, 600hp, or??? I used to know how many CFM was needed per 100hp. I do not have a clue what kg/h is. I suspect it is a metric version of CFM. Dose anyone know about how many kg/h it takes to support every 100hp? | ||
|  01-26-2009, 08:13 PM | 
 | 
| Registered Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: UK 
					Posts: 1,442
				 | 
			I don't think you can directly relate HP to CFM. The engine size and compression ratio and peak RPM at which the peak HP occurs are a few things I can think of that would change the CFM requirement for "300" HP. I found this online, I don't know what kind of calculation it does but it will at least give you some number: http://www.bgsoflex.com/flowcalc1.html From http://www.samracing.com/CHP-July-06_page7.html: Quote: 
 
				__________________ 83 911SC Targa Everything I say is my personal opinion, and has nothing to do with my team. Last edited by Won; 01-27-2009 at 12:08 AM.. | ||
|  01-27-2009, 12:05 AM | 
 | 
|   | 
| Registered Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Australia 
					Posts: 145
				 | 
			I understand that you are trying to determine a MAF device nominated as 800kG/hr, as to what size engine would it suit. In rather round numbers, at 1 bar pressure (sea level) dry air has a density of 1.19 gms per litre at 25degC, the 800kG / hour you nominate would (max out ) on a 4 stroke 3.2 litre engine at 7000rpm - (subject to numerous induction factors). or 800kG per hr / 1.19 = 672,269 litres per hour = 11,204 litres per minute = 395cu feet per minute (also for your info at 0degC, dry air, density is 1.293gms/litre) As for the HP many more variables to consider. Trust this gives you a guide. Paul Last edited by CruiseControl; 01-27-2009 at 02:39 AM.. | ||
|  01-27-2009, 01:34 AM | 
 | 
| Registered Join Date: May 2001 Location: Peoples Republic of Long Beach, NY 
					Posts: 21,140
				 | 
			common knowledge is that cfm is determined by cylinder size and rpm.  The formulas for this determines the venturi size in carbs discussed around here. Bosch has a formula that's posted and I posted another one I found used by a HP book writer and dyno man. These also posted somewhere in carb threads. Then there are tuners that increase the venturi another 2 mm over text. The idea is that an oversized venturi will slow air velocity and lower combustion EGT. Like it or not heat is power. so maybe you can connect the dots? party hearty 
				__________________ Ronin LB '77 911s 2.7 PMO E 8.5 SSI Monty MSD JPI w x6 | ||
|  01-27-2009, 02:51 AM | 
 | 
| Registered Join Date: Mar 2006 
					Posts: 1,107
				 | 
			How many kg/h dose is take to support 300hp? You can estimate hp from air flow, but you need BSFC to get an accurate result. In an engine, you also need to know VE, but you can ignore this for measured air mass through a meter. Output is directly related to the amount of fuel burnt. The amount of fuel burnt is directly related to the amount of air available. In your case, convert the 800 k/hr into lbs/hr (X2.2)=1760 lbs/hr air. Peak output AFR is around 13:1, so divide 1760/13=135 lb/hr of fuel. Now you need BSFC (brake specific fuel consumption) which can vary from 0.45 to .060 depending on engine, (something like a 911 with large open chambers is higher than a 4 valve pent roof). Using 0.50 lb/hr (1/2 lbs/hr/hp) as a rule of thumb, 800k/hr air can make 270 hp. At 0.45 lb/hr (not a 911) you get 300 hp. You can also use the 1/2 lb/hr per hp BSFC to estimate hp, just add up the lb/hr of the fuel injectors, say 6X24 lbs injector=144 lbs/hr X2 = 288hp. So, a six with 24 lbs/hr injectors, will make less than 288 hp. 
				__________________ Paul | ||
|  01-27-2009, 05:00 AM | 
 | 
| Forced Induction Junkie | Quote: 
 
				__________________ Dave '85 930 Factory Special Wishes Flachbau Werk I Zuffenhausen 3.3l/330BHP Engine with Sonderwunsch Cams, FabSpeed Headers, Kokeln IC, Twin Plugged Electromotive Crankfire, Tial Wastegate(0.8 Bar), K27 Hybrid Turbo, Ruf Twin-tip Muffler, Fikse FM-5's 8&10x17, 8:41 R&P | ||
|  01-27-2009, 06:18 AM | 
 | 
| Registered Join Date: Jan 2004 Location: Sacramento 
					Posts: 7,269
				 | 
			Well done. Thank you, thank you!
		 | ||
|  01-27-2009, 06:34 AM | 
 |