![]() |
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,216
|
More for the not so faint at heart. Oh the humanity !
Never gets any easier to see things like this !
![]()
__________________
Work to Live, don't live to work... |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
|
And it's a SWB car too. That's like the icing on the cake.
Cars like this help me to imagine what the sports car club in hell looks like. The guy who built this thing would be treasurer.
__________________
jasper 2002 996 - arctic silver - PSS9, H&R sways,X51 oil pan, console delete, AASCO liteweight flywheel, gbox detent, RS motor mounts, 997 shifter. Great car. past: another 2002 996 and a 1978 SC with-webers-cams-etc. |
||
![]() |
|
1974 911 w/ 83 SC engine
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Austin, Texas
Posts: 602
|
![]() Sweet. Finally get to use this. |
||
![]() |
|
Almost Banned Once
|
Looks like a victim of the 80s... We should all learn some lessons from the past.
Keep you car all Porsche and as original as possible I say.
__________________
- Peter |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 73
|
Some people are wired all wrong.
__________________
Chris ----------------------------------- Long Live Historic Racing |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
|
That is a very big manatee. Maybe it's the liquor but I find this very funny.
![]()
__________________
jasper 2002 996 - arctic silver - PSS9, H&R sways,X51 oil pan, console delete, AASCO liteweight flywheel, gbox detent, RS motor mounts, 997 shifter. Great car. past: another 2002 996 and a 1978 SC with-webers-cams-etc. |
||
![]() |
|
![]() |
Registered
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 11,758
|
If it runs well, it would make a good RSR look conversion.
But then, there is an ass for every saddle, or so I hear. |
||
![]() |
|
No sleep 'til... BROOKLYN
|
I've had a cold for a few day's and when I saw your poster I laughed so hard I choked.
It's so absurd it's hilarious. Take care. O-
__________________
-Orlando- '89 3.2L G-50 '77 S w '79, 3.0L '90 T-3 Syncro 32C #16 |
||
![]() |
|
THE IRONMAN
|
Is the Chevy V8 a lot heavier thant the flat six....? If so, should be a very viscious car in a thight curve at speed...!
__________________
1984 911 CARRERA RUBY RED TARGA SW CHIPPED-BURSCH CATBYPASS MONTY FREE FLOW EXHAUST <IN GAS WE TRUST> |
||
![]() |
|
Diss Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: SC - (Aiken in the 'other' SC)
Posts: 5,020
|
Quote:
In other words the small block Chevy is quite a bit lighter... ...but Then you add the cooling system, the raised center of gravity, the decreased reliable lifetime, and the loss in value...
__________________
- "Speed kills! How fast do you want to go?" - anon. - "If More is better then Too Much is just right!!!" - Mad Mac Durgeloh -- Wayne - 87 Carrera coupe -> The pooch. |
||
![]() |
|
Checked out
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: On a beach
Posts: 10,127
|
no way is a SBC lighter than the flat 6 that came in that car.
|
||
![]() |
|
Registered
|
If you use an aluminum block and heads, manifold, rods...etc...you can get the weight of a small block ( up to 440 cu in! ) to about 320 pounds.
Bob ps...that would get you about 550 HP as well.
__________________
Bob Hutson |
||
![]() |
|
Diss Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: SC - (Aiken in the 'other' SC)
Posts: 5,020
|
The 911 engine is heavier then you would think. If you machined all the cooling fins off of it and put a water jacket over it it would weigh quite a bit less.
A modern small block is a fairly lightweight unit. Add an aluminum block and it is pretty easy to pick one up by yourself. - The Chevy has to add all of the external cooling system and water which isn't listed here. - The Porsche has to add the external oil system which isn't listed here. - A lot of Porsche engine weights don't include the intake manifolds and the headers which are always part of the Chevy specification. The 911 motor is a over 450 pounds. The joy of the flat 6 isn't in its light weight. It is in the indestructibility of it. (What other engine in the world has 6 pistons and 8 main bearings?)
__________________
- "Speed kills! How fast do you want to go?" - anon. - "If More is better then Too Much is just right!!!" - Mad Mac Durgeloh -- Wayne - 87 Carrera coupe -> The pooch. |
||
![]() |
|
Checked out
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: On a beach
Posts: 10,127
|
I've had both out of the cars, 911 and SBC. My SBC had aluminum heads, edelbrock manifold and carb and steel headers.
Taking it out of the car, putting the engines on stands, in the back of pickups for transport, moving around the garage, etc., the SBC sure seemed a heck of a lot heavier than a 911 engine. For ex, we could easily lift the 911 engine into a pickup or SUV with 2 guys. no way could the 2 of us get the SBC lifted. I just don't see how a big iron block V8 is going to be lighter than a smaller all alloy 6 cylinder. they're both boat anchors compared to a 914 engine, tho! Last edited by McLovin; 12-20-2009 at 11:17 AM.. |
||
![]() |
|
muck-raker
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Coastal PNW
Posts: 3,059
|
I've repeatedly read about how the SBC is lighter than the flat 6...I always found it hard to believe, but it's hard to dispute some of the experts.
I think it would be cool to have that much juice...but Man, that car is Fugly.
__________________
STONE '88 Cabriolet, using EP Slick 20w50 partial synthetic Snake Oil...just as Rommel intended. ![]() Deny Everything; Admit Nothing; and Always Make Counter-accusations ![]() |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Mar 1999
Location: Cornwall-on-Hudson, New York, USA
Posts: 4,499
|
"...big iron block V8..."
I don't think anybody's talking about an iron smallblock in this conversation.
__________________
Stephan Wilkinson '83 911SC Gold-Plated Porsche '04 replacement Boxster |
||
![]() |
|
Manassas, VA
|
Could someone out there with their engine out of the car and going onto, or coming off an engine stand, weigh the engine. It can be done with two bathroom scales and a pallet. Or if you have the sophisticated scale that hangs from a chain, that would be better.
Thanks, Mark
__________________
1991 964 Polar Silver Metallic Turbo Coupe |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Texas
Posts: 119
|
Don't have an extra chebby or pcar engine laying around but here's weight info provided via toy-jet.com (conversion car)
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Weight difference 3.0 liter Porsche engine -vs- GM LS1 5.7 liter Corvette engine Stock 3.0 Liter Porsche Engine My fully dressed 1980 3.0 Porsche engine ready to install weighed 472 lbs. Factor in the weight of the oil in the 10 quart oil tank mounted at the rear of the vehicle (which will need to be removed) needed to support the 3.0 engine, then your engine plus oil tank weight jumps up to 490.5 lbs. at the rear of the vehicle. Let's factor in the oil and tank weight. One gallon of oil is 7.4 lbs. Ten quarts is 2.5 gallons 2.5 x 7.4 lbs. = 18.5lbs 18.5 lbs. + (3.0 ltr. engine wt.) 472 lbs. = 490.5 lbs. at the rear of the vehicle (not factoring in the weight of the oil tank and lines which will be removed). All Aluminum LS1 A fully dressed 2000 LS1 5.7 liter Corvette engine ready to install with the engine computer and wire harness, complete exhaust system, engine mounting brackets, AC compressor, alternator, custom water pump adapter, transmission adapter plate and flywheel weighed 434 lbs. This is a rear engine weight savings of 56 lbs. over the Porsche 3.0 engine. I did not weigh the above engines with the transaxle or clutch assembly bolted to either engine. These parts would be used for both installations and their weights would obviously cancel. LS1 = 434 lbs. at the rear of the vehicle Now let's factor in the Toy-Jet Cooling system In conclusion: Weight of LS1 engine -vs- the Porsche 3.0 stock engine: 56 lbs. lighter Weight of (ToyJet) cooling system -vs- stock Porsche Wing - 35 lbs. heavier 21 lbs. total weight difference A porsche 911 equipped with the LS1 conversion and Toy-Jet cooling system installation yieilds a combined weight savings of 21 pounds lighter at the rear of the vehicle. Hence: No added cost of beefing up your rear suspension to off set any added weight. Performance Comparison The heart of the Porsche 1980 SC is a 3-liter, 6-cylinder, alloy boxer motor, It will go from 0 to 60 miles per hour in 5.8 seconds. The quarter mile dash takes just over 14 seconds, and top speed is 149mph. LS1 Supercharged (low boost) 1980 Porsche 911 SC is a 5.7liter V8, alloy motor. It will go from 0 to 60 miles per hour in 3.7 seconds. The quarter mile dash takes just over 11.5 seconds, and top speed is right at 190 - 200 mph. Not bad for a vehicle conceived and built in a home garage. |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
|
ghetto!!
|
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Mar 1999
Location: Cornwall-on-Hudson, New York, USA
Posts: 4,499
|
There is no way on god's green earth that a low-boost LS1 will drive anything to 190-200 mph. I'll buy everything else--weights, etc.--but when you're talking horsepower pushing flat-plate area with drag rising at the square of the speed, I think it is, all you need is a 20-year-old Texas Instruments calculator to tell you that'll never happen. 165, 170.
__________________
Stephan Wilkinson '83 911SC Gold-Plated Porsche '04 replacement Boxster |
||
![]() |
|