Pelican Parts
Parts Catalog Accessories Catalog How To Articles Tech Forums
Call Pelican Parts at 888-280-7799
Shopping Cart Cart | Project List | Order Status | Help



Go Back   Pelican Parts Forums > Porsche Forums > Porsche 911 Technical Forum


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread
Author
Thread Post New Thread    Reply
Registered
 
gestalt1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: chicago
Posts: 1,077
swb suspension setup opinions needed

hi, i'm getting ready to send out my bilstein struts/shocks to be re-valved and i want to give bilstein the right info so the valving is correct. basically i'm building a 911r clone on a 68 912 chassis. i am converting to the 911 engine the car will weigh about 1800lbs. i did some research and found that there is a 6-7 mm difference form the front to rear torsion sizes on factory setups and race cars are more like 8-9mm. i'm planning to run 21mm front and 30mm rear solid torsions and a 19mm front sway with no rear sway. i am hopeing that the torsions will provide good control and the sway can ba a tuning aid to adjust the front to rear understeer/oversteer balance. i realize this is a little odd setup and it may not work well. if i have the bilstiens valved for these specs will they be ok if i switch to a more conventional setup? (by conventional i'm thinking 21mm front, 29 rear with 19mm front and rear sways).

btw - this will be a barely street legal race car that will get most miles on the track and driving to and from the track.

thanks!

__________________
BMW 128i
73 rsr clone - sold
68 912 project to become 911r (almost done!)
Old 02-16-2010, 11:06 AM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #1 (permalink)
Moderator
 
304065's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 9,569
No, the valving of the shocks is specific to the torsion bar size. Remember that the spring rate increases with the fourth power of the diameter, so going 21/30 vs 21/29 will make a difference. Remember, the relationship between sizes is not linear, so a 6-7mm difference at one level is not the same as the same difference at a different level.

Why not stick with a proven combination like 22/28? That will make it easier for Bilstein to match. Also, remember that the SWB springplate is shorter than the LWB-- as such, you will realize a higher wheel rate with the SWB than with the LWB, something to take into consideration if you go bigger in the rear.

With fixed valving it's tough to accomodate changes unless you want to carry around a whole steamer trunk full of shocks (Carroll Smith).

I used to have 22/28 on my LWB 1971, then went to 23/31 which I like a whole lot better. Truth is it is impossible to get enough spring rate in the rear with torsion bars, which is why the factory went with coils in the early 1970s on their race cars-- that and adjustability.
__________________
'66 911 #304065 Irischgruen
‘96 993 Carrera 2 Polarsilber
'81 R65
Ex-'71 911 PCA C-Stock Club Racer #806 (Sold 5/15/13)
Ex-'88 Carrera (Sold 3/29/02)
Ex-'91 Carrera 2 Cabriolet (Sold 8/20/04)
Ex-'89 944 Turbo S (Sold 8/21/20)
Old 02-16-2010, 11:23 AM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #2 (permalink)
Registered
 
gestalt1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: chicago
Posts: 1,077
thanks for the advice John, what do think about running just a front sway? it seems that most vintage race swb cars run the 18mm sways front and rear with the biggest torsions available.
__________________
BMW 128i
73 rsr clone - sold
68 912 project to become 911r (almost done!)
Old 02-16-2010, 11:31 AM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #3 (permalink)
Moderator
 
304065's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 9,569
If you want to vintage race I would convert to a LWB front end if the rules allow, use 23/31 and use a Smart Racing 31mm front bar and a 27mm rear bar.
__________________
'66 911 #304065 Irischgruen
‘96 993 Carrera 2 Polarsilber
'81 R65
Ex-'71 911 PCA C-Stock Club Racer #806 (Sold 5/15/13)
Ex-'88 Carrera (Sold 3/29/02)
Ex-'91 Carrera 2 Cabriolet (Sold 8/20/04)
Ex-'89 944 Turbo S (Sold 8/21/20)
Old 02-16-2010, 11:42 AM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #4 (permalink)
Confused
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Johannesburg, South Africa
Posts: 102
I have a '67 running 23/33 torsions and 23mm SMART sways front and rear - shocks valved to match the torsion bars. I did run it with the front sway bar only for a period, without issues, but marginally less tune able than with both front and rear.

Installing the rear bar was a real pain as the mounts have to be spaced inwards on the swb, and I only noticed that after installing one side - oops

Surprisingly, it is not as hard a ride as I thought it would be, and would reccomend the setup to anyone who uses their swb car mostly on the track, without going to the expense of a coil over setup.

My setup was reccomended and sourced from Steve Weiner, who is both a porsche scholar and a gentleman.

__________________
Squeaky brakes are safer....
2000 GT3 Clubsport, 1967 911 2.7 Track toy in progress
1983 Lamborghini Countach 5000S, 2009 VW Tuareg, 6 Bicycles - 3 Road, 3 Mountain
Old 02-18-2010, 12:05 AM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #5 (permalink)
Reply


 


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:30 AM.


 
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2025 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page
 

DTO Garage Plus vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.