Pelican Parts Forums

Pelican Parts Forums (http://forums.pelicanparts.com/)
-   Porsche 911 Technical Forum (http://forums.pelicanparts.com/porsche-911-technical-forum/)
-   -   Move front 'M' Calipers to the rear? (http://forums.pelicanparts.com/porsche-911-technical-forum/564074-move-front-m-calipers-rear.html)

joeblow 09-13-2010 07:01 AM

Move front 'M' Calipers to the rear?
 
Guys I have an early car with F & R 'M' calipers on it. The front is getting later BOGE/Bilsteins with Alloy 'S' calipers.

So I am sitting here looking at the removed front 'M' calipers thinking it might be a nice upgrade to mount them in the rear. I know the 'balance' will be off but a proportioning valve could fix that. They will need new lines but everything else is bolt on it looks like. Thoughts?

djpateman 09-13-2010 07:16 AM

I don't think it is worth the aggravation. 48mm pistons vs 38mm pistons is a huge difference to compensate for. I've only seen race cars with pistons that big on the back, and few enough of them. It also adds a lot more unsprung weight.

Grady Clay 09-13-2010 07:27 AM

Is my memory failing or are they different bolt spacing on SWB?
Same F&R on 'M' caliper LWB.
Different on 'S' caliper LWB.

Best,
Grady

Bill Verburg 09-13-2010 08:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by joeblow (Post 5557885)
Guys I have an early car with F & R 'M' calipers on it. The front is getting later BOGE/Bilsteins with Alloy 'S' calipers.

So I am sitting here looking at the removed front 'M' calipers thinking it might be a nice upgrade to mount them in the rear. I know the 'balance' will be off but a proportioning valve could fix that. They will need new lines but everything else is bolt on it looks like. Thoughts?

don't do it

no, a p/v will not correctly compensate

you want ~1.6+/- bias, moving front to rear will give you 1

Trackrash 09-13-2010 08:15 AM

Quote:

don't do it

no, a p/v will not correctly compensate

you want ~1.6+/- bias, moving front to rear will give you 1
+1

You don't want to increase the rear braking on your car. You will find that with the S calipers in the front the brake balance will be great with your original rear calipers.

joeblow 09-13-2010 08:32 AM

They do bolt on as I test mounted them.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Grady Clay (Post 5557934)
Is my memory failing or are they different bolt spacing on SWB?
Same F&R on 'M' caliper LWB.
Different on 'S' caliper LWB.

Best,
Grady


joeblow 09-13-2010 08:34 AM

OK it seems the consensus is that they are too much unless I go much bigger in the front which I do not intend to do.

I would think that if a four piston caliper was used with larger piston area it would be a nice easy way to add some rear brake without a lot of $$$ investment.

By the way the weight difference between the front M and rear M is not very much.

chris_seven 09-13-2010 08:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by joeblow (Post 5558045)
They do bolt on as I test mounted them.

Seems a bit odd.

The Rear M should be a 3" spacing

Early Front M had the same spacing.

All Alloy S Calipers had a 3.5" spacing so you may have an issue with your struts.

Bill Verburg 09-13-2010 09:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by joeblow (Post 5558049)
OK it seems the consensus is that they are too much unless I go much bigger in the front which I do not intend to do.

I would think that if a four piston caliper was used with larger piston area it would be a nice easy way to add some rear brake without a lot of $$$ investment.

By the way the weight difference between the front M and rear M is not very much.

nope,
common choices for the front and resulting hyd bias ratio w/ front M used in back
964 or Boxster 2
993 or 993tt 2.2
930 2

remember you want ~1.6

the bigger rotors used on all of the above further move bias to the front

when the car is set up right you can take advantage of more rear bias down into the 1.475 + area, but no further

jpnovak 09-13-2010 09:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bill Verburg (Post 5558117)
when the car is set up right you can take advantage of more rear bias down into the 1.475 + area, but no further

Bill, Can you elaborate on this statement? What setup changes need to be in place? I would assume a much stiffer suspension would not weight transfer as much to the front. This could take advantage of increased rear bias and therefore more braking force from the rear tires before rear lockup.

Walt Fricke 09-13-2010 10:18 AM

Anti-dive (as the 930s had) front suspension might reduce weight transfer.

Flieger 09-13-2010 10:33 AM

Anti-dive does not reduce weight transfer, it actually speeds it up. The main way to reduce weight transfer is to lower the center of mass or lengthen the wheelbase.

Bill Verburg 09-13-2010 10:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jpnovak (Post 5558149)
Bill, Can you elaborate on this statement? What setup changes need to be in place? I would assume a much stiffer suspension would not weight transfer as much to the front. This could take advantage of increased rear bias and therefore more braking force from the rear tires before rear lockup.

the car needs to be very low and stiff, you will also want a p/v and an effective lsd, if you do that then you can get f/r pad/rotor temps to be almost equal, the braking decel rate is just awesome

Green 912 09-13-2010 01:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Trackrash (Post 5558019)
+1

You don't want to increase the rear braking on your car. You will find that with the S calipers in the front the brake balance will be great with your original rear calipers.

I did just this to make a full set of four on the 912 after the rears were found to have been damaged by an old ham-fisted rebuild. I just so happened to have a later set of stuts and some S binders in hand and threw it all on the car.


Don't do it. the results are not an improvement. S fronts and M rears are well set up together. I even run this set on the 911. Think about it. IIRC the pad size is the same and you will need to reduce the pressure to make them work with the fronts. You are now right back where you started.

joeblow 09-13-2010 05:17 PM

You forgot downforce! Big wings go up in angle of attack during high speed braking which adds downforce during the nose down giving further ability to efectivly add rear braking.

Ask me how I know ;)

Quote:

Originally Posted by Flieger (Post 5558275)
Anti-dive does not reduce weight transfer, it actually speeds it up. The main way to reduce weight transfer is to lower the center of mass or lengthen the wheelbase.


joeblow 09-13-2010 05:23 PM

Sorry if I confused anybody I have six calipers, two front M, two rear M and two front S. I changed struts and front calipers, swaping in the S calipers in front which left me with two front M calipers I was thinking about putting on the back. I think that I will hold off though now that I am hearing all this.

I do have some 944 Turbo calipers I was once thinking of putting on the front but I am leaning more toward period parts for this car, even if they are not 'original'. I figure the guys in the day were mixing things up that they had access to for race cars so I will do the same ;)



Quote:

Originally Posted by chris_seven (Post 5558102)
Seems a bit odd.

The Rear M should be a 3" spacing

Early Front M had the same spacing.

All Alloy S Calipers had a 3.5" spacing so you may have an issue with your struts.



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:03 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2025 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Pelican Parts Website


DTO Garage Plus vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.