![]() |
|
|
|
MBruns for President
|
2.7 CIS Engine - Worth it to go to webers?
So I have a rebuilt engine in my car. No receipts - but some detail that includes a new 7R case, new bearings, etc. From everything that I can tell - ~3000 miles on the rebuild.
My long term plan is a 3.6 - which may be a year or so away. My short term question is a 2.7 - is it worth it to throw on a pair of webers? When I did the PPI - the compression numbers came out very good. It has a set of early (1974) heat exchangers (which the SSI's are modeled on) and a Bursch muffler. The engine is strong as it is with the CIS - but I've had a few people that I respect tell me that I should look for a set of Webers... Opinions??
__________________
Current Whip: - 2003 996 Twin Turbo - 39K miles - Lapis Blue/Grey Past: 1974 IROC (3.6) , 1987 Cabriolet (3.4) , 1990 C2 Targa, 1989 S2 |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: MYR S.C.
Posts: 17,321
|
if a 3.6 is definately in the future, and the CIS is fine, then no. save your money, it may mean the 3.6 sooner. i dont know what is holding up the 3.6, but you may drive the 2.7 long enough to figure out its status, then sell it if it is a good strong motor, you will get more for it now than later.
__________________
86 930 94kmiles [_ ![]() 88 BMW 325is 200K+ SOLD 03 BMW 330CI 220K:: [_ ![]() 01 suburban 330K:: [_ ![]() RACE CAR:: sold |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
|
You don't say how you are going to use the car. CIS offers good drivability, easy starting hot or cold, and decent gas mileage. Going to carbs gets you quicker engine response, but at the cost of gas mileage and may be harder to start when cold. If it's just a weekend toy, that may be OK.
My opinion? Don't bother spending the money and time to setup carbs if you are just going to change to a 3.6 anyway. However, the 2.7 might sell for more if it has carbs. I doubt you'll get your money back though.
__________________
Rex 1975 911s and 2012 Range Rover Sport HSE 1995 BMW R1100RS, 1948 Harley FL |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Rio Rancho, New Mexico
Posts: 200
|
Jeremy,
I would save my money for the 3.6 conversion. Weber's Are fun, but they'll need cams and pistons to bring the 2.7 alive. $2500 later the 2.7 will really run. See my signature. Use the $2500 towards the $10,000 you'll spend on the 3.6 upgrade. I like your car from the pictures.
__________________
Doug Was 2.7racer. '76, 2.7 w/Webers, JE pistons, Solex cams. Elephant bushings front & rear, 23mm & 28mm torsion bars, big brakes front & rear, Pertronix. Track car. '85 3.2 stock, Orient red, comfy street car. |
||
![]() |
|
MBruns for President
|
I use the car for an odd day at the office - weekends and DE
I have trouble leaving things alone. At the start of this adventure (the 1974 acquisition) - I made myself the commitment to leave the engine alone - then I've had two people tell me - you should look for a set of webers, it will really wake that engine up... I just need to focus on the 3.6, I imagine that focus will be sharper after my first DE and not having enough ponies coming into those long fast straights at Sebring...
__________________
Current Whip: - 2003 996 Twin Turbo - 39K miles - Lapis Blue/Grey Past: 1974 IROC (3.6) , 1987 Cabriolet (3.4) , 1990 C2 Targa, 1989 S2 |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Cincinnati
Posts: 672
|
So, I've done a little research here and I also have a 74 2.7 CIS and I want to add webers. Can I buy webers from any year and engine size? For example, could I buy webers from a 73 2.4 (if they had webers) or a 68 2.0 and just bolt them on? Minus any tuning like jet changes...things like that.
If I would add webers could I keep my CIS cams for now but know that it wouldn't create anymore horsepower as apposed to using another set of cams. Am I right? What other cams would be best for the 2.7/Weber combo? I wouldn't be using the car for the track or DE's. Just would like to have a hotter motor. I apologize in advance Jeremy for borrowing your thread for my questions. Thank you,
__________________
Chris 1974 Porsche 911 Targa w/935 flat fan twin turbo motor, not really "DTW" Dave W. "There is really not any such thing as a rebuild 'on the cheap' on a 2.7 motor. You'll either pay now, or you'll pay later, but you'll pay." |
||
![]() |
|
![]() |
Registered
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Idaho
Posts: 2,356
|
Quote:
In terms of having a low HP 2.7 for DE. . . I've been DEing mine for a number of years and became an instructor this year. A low HP car is THE BEST way to learn how to drive on the track. You will learn so much more, become a better driver and have just as much fun w/your 2.7L. When you're ready for a 3.6L (financially and otherwise) you will have a greater understanding of momentum, being smooth, driving a good line, driving at the limit etc.... and you will fly! IMHO of course. Tom
__________________
'74 911 Red Sunroof Coupe, 3.6L, etc... '76 912 Yellow SPEC 911/911CUP |
||
![]() |
|
MBruns for President
|
Thanks Tom - and yes I agree - I worked my way up to the instructor ranks with my old 1987 Cabriolet (with a 287 HP 3.4). The tough part about Sebring is that it's a high horsepower track.
When I said first DE - I meant in this car... But yes, appreciate where you are coming from
__________________
Current Whip: - 2003 996 Twin Turbo - 39K miles - Lapis Blue/Grey Past: 1974 IROC (3.6) , 1987 Cabriolet (3.4) , 1990 C2 Targa, 1989 S2 |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Idaho
Posts: 2,356
|
Quote:
__________________
'74 911 Red Sunroof Coupe, 3.6L, etc... '76 912 Yellow SPEC 911/911CUP |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: MYR S.C.
Posts: 17,321
|
it is very easy to tell somone else to spend money. talk has very deep pockets.
just drive it and enjoy it like it is.
__________________
86 930 94kmiles [_ ![]() 88 BMW 325is 200K+ SOLD 03 BMW 330CI 220K:: [_ ![]() 01 suburban 330K:: [_ ![]() RACE CAR:: sold |
||
![]() |
|
MBruns for President
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
![]() To really benefit you need to change to a hotter cam with more overlap - but guess what - the CIS pistons don't have much clearance - so can't go too aggressive with the cams unless you replace the pistons. If you are going to do that - then may as well twin plug and go with a higher compression. If I were you - I'd look for a set with the air cleaners and linkage already set up. make sure the shafts don't have too much play.
__________________
Current Whip: - 2003 996 Twin Turbo - 39K miles - Lapis Blue/Grey Past: 1974 IROC (3.6) , 1987 Cabriolet (3.4) , 1990 C2 Targa, 1989 S2 |
|||
![]() |
|
Platinum Member
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Leave the gun. Take the cannoli.
Posts: 20,888
|
I have a 2.7 cis with webers. Works, runs great, but I never compared to CIS as the carbs were on my 2.2 when I did the swap, so a carb swap was easiest.
However, I've done a 3.6 conversion and wouldn't go down that road again either. For the track I've gutted a 964, get the same light/raw feel with better suspension and brakes. If I ever do the engine again in the '71 I would probably look for a 3 liter. Last edited by dad911; 10-14-2010 at 07:19 AM.. |
||
![]() |
|
![]() |
Registered
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Cincinnati
Posts: 672
|
Thanks Jeremy. Guess I need to start hunting the classifieds.
__________________
Chris 1974 Porsche 911 Targa w/935 flat fan twin turbo motor, not really "DTW" Dave W. "There is really not any such thing as a rebuild 'on the cheap' on a 2.7 motor. You'll either pay now, or you'll pay later, but you'll pay." |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
|
I had a similar decision to make earlier about my CIS, but decided if I was going to do anything, it would be to go to an EFI vs a carburetor. Why would you go backwards in technology? It also looked like the EFI would cost the same or less than a carburetor.
__________________
81 -930 82 - Austin Mini 998 78 Mini 1275cc -totaled 83SC Euro w/77 3.0 Carerra Eng.--sold Several other daily drivers not worth mentioning... |
||
![]() |
|