![]() |
It would be interesting to know how many of you that posted negative remarks about the 912E have:
1. Seen one and been close enough to touch it 2. driven one a greater distance that around the block 3. owned one Back in the 70's I had a part time gig transporting Porsche's from the EPA test lab in Ann Arbor back to California. I got paid to drive the car and usually got to keep the car until my next trip. I actually injoyed driving the 912E. It handled great, acceleration was acceptable, got great mileage and basically was a decent car. The car didn't fail because it was "an Edsel" it failed because Porsche had too many Intermediate cars and they had to push the 924 or lose money. |
I dunno.
My neighbor has one of the nicest ones in existence and it doesn't really drive that much differently than a 2 liter 911T. His has stock fuel injection but +2mm pistons. It's a cool car. And there have been radical advances in Type IV tuning (Jake Raby, FAT et al). Dave L has 3 of these cars, one of which has a 2270cc carb'd engine. He also has a 911SC IIRC and it would interesting to see how the 2 compare in raw acceleration given the 7:31 R&P and probably 140-150 bhp in the sig. lighter E.... BTW Car and Driver got 0-60 in 9.7 when they tested the 912E. |
I have a soft spot in my heart for 912's. It was the car I learned how to drive stick in. It was a 1970 912.
Although I do agree with the "Sheep in Wolf's Clothing" thing. http://forums.pelicanparts.com/uploa...1296829464.jpg |
Quote:
Now THAT would be rare... :D :D :D |
Yes, a 1970 912 would be rare since the last year of production was 1969 but, let's not confuse the issue at hand. This post is about the 1976 912E.
I too owned an early 912. It was a 1968 (4) speed model which I had rebuilt to 1969 spec's thus removing the air pump etc. I installed a set of 6" Fuch wheels with 185/70/15 tires and they just cleared the fenders. I'd love to find that car and restore it back to new. |
I have a Jake Raby 3.6 Boxster and would like to move up to a Jake Raby Type IV engined 912
|
The cool looking*fun/dollar ratio of a 912 E is appealing. Especially since you can hotrod that engine comparatively cheaply.
I had an old 4 speed 912 that would have been a great car without those stupid Solexes. |
Totally agree. In the late '80's, after owing a string of sports cars, I had to have a Porsche and started with a 912 rust bucket. After a lot of work and paint, I said: A sports car needs more power and ability to take the top off. In 1990, sold it and bought my 73.5 Targa.....Happy Times
|
Quote:
|
I also think it is funny when people say you can put a Jack Raby motor in one, they also say this about the 914. Why would anyone, wait to get on a waiting list, put half the money down, wait 6 months or longer and pay $20,000 for a hopped up 4 cylinder? A lot easier to put a nice 6 cylinder in and cheaper too. Also if you need to spend a lot of money to put a stronger 4 cylinder in why not start with a 911 in the first place? Not knocking Jack Raby, I've read his website top to bottom and he sounds like he builds a great engine, but has anyone checked the prices?!!!
Regarding the 924, didnt they came out in 1977? I dont think the 912E competed with them, I think they sold in low numbers on their own. The 914 was build in 76 and overlapped the 912E., maybe that was their competition? The Edsel analogy is probably a good one. Lastly I like the 912E, I just think it is amusing that they are called rare and asking prices usually exceed that of a comparable 911, that is all. Even more amazing is when someone puts a 911 engine in one, why not start with a 911? |
A 912 is a step up from a 356, in so many ways. I notice that not many people make fun of a 356. I wonder why?
I also notice that most people that poke insults at a particular car (912, 914, 928, Ferrari, Lambo, whatever...) have never owned one. Funny, isn't it? A 912 seems slow, compared to a 911, but that same 911 seems awfully slow next to a 930. A 930 won't catch a recent Boxtster S on a twisty road and a Boxster S has no chance against my buddy's Carrera GT.... All of which is rather pointless drivel, if you think about it. JR |
point taken on the more impressive Raby engines.
But he is or was offering a $5k 120 hp or so one via a shop he partnered with. The Type IV is ok with short drives and putting around whereas you know what will happen if you do that with a flat six...they don't like it and not bringing the oil up to temp = bad. I wonder what a 65-69 912 build costs...especially one with 1883cc nickies and or twin plug etc. Probably as much as a Raby 2316cc or more... |
Earlyaircooled, check your production dates:
The 914 ran from 1969 to 1976 and the first 924 was in 1976 |
Quote:
I owned a '68 912 between early 911's, (throw in a beater 356) way before either climbed the dollar summit. I have also owned an '83 SC and a '94 964. ...was transferred from San Diego to the East Coast and drove the 912 almost 5000 miles in a serpentine route across the country. What a trouble free joy. I'm now back to 356's: Manage the energy, enjoy the math of limited power, revel in the balance of a 356/912. |
Quote:
|
I checked with Raby's business recently....$6500 for the 2056cc 120hp parts to build the motor yourself....the do it yourself kit. It took a few emails back and forth before they would tell me that. If you want him to build you one it is more like $25k and that gets you a big , 4 cylinder with modest 6 cylinder like performance.
|
The first 924 may have been made in 76 but I believe 1977 was the first model year. I've read from several different sources that the 912E was a stop gap measure until the 924 was available then it was discontinued. That is why they only made them one year, that and low sales I suspect.
|
Lastly I like the 912E, I just think it is amusing that they are called rare and asking prices usually exceed that of a comparable 911, that is all. Even more amazing is when someone puts a 911 engine in one, why not start with a 911?[/QUOTE]
Why not??? Its just a roller after all. Exactly the same as a 911 but with smaller suspension and brakes.Do you really think that Porsche built separate bodys and called some 911 and some 912? :rolleyes:When I built mine I was looking for a completely gutted roller as I was intending on changing suspension, brakes, adding a full cage anyway....Pretty much the same thing you do to any 911 your going to track. wanna race? ;) |
Quote:
So for the 76 model year, there was a gap at the end of 914 production and before the 1977 model year 924 was ready. There were also some leftover 914 VW engines. So, why not kill 2 birds with one stone, stick the leftover 914 VW engines in some 911 bodies, get rid of the engines, AND have a lower priced car to fill the 6 month gap period between the end of the 914 and the intro of the 924? So the 912E didn't compete with either the 914 or the 924. It fell in a short time slot between the 2. Also, a lot of the posts here seem to be talking about the 66-69 912. Obviously, a very different car than a '76 912E. An early 912 is a 911 with a highly pedigreed and historically important Porsche 356 engine. It is Porsche through and through. A '76 912E is a mid year 911 with a VW bus engine. |
Dont B hatin on tha 912E itz a perfekt bass 4 A cuztom stunna...
Herez a 912E wit 993 turbo luk in Lambo Orange an it got Lambo doors: http://forums.pelicanparts.com/uploa...1296842814.jpg http://forums.pelicanparts.com/uploa...1296842867.jpg An my famous 912E Bad Boyz Turbo Luk wit Diablo rimz: http://forums.pelicanparts.com/uploa...1296842895.jpg http://forums.pelicanparts.com/uploa...1296842954.jpg |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:03 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2025 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Pelican Parts Website