Pelican Parts Forums

Pelican Parts Forums (http://forums.pelicanparts.com/)
-   Porsche 911 Technical Forum (http://forums.pelicanparts.com/porsche-911-technical-forum/)
-   -   Rebuilt top end only or complete overhaul? (http://forums.pelicanparts.com/porsche-911-technical-forum/645618-rebuilt-top-end-only-complete-overhaul.html)

El_Mecanico 12-18-2011 07:57 AM

Rebuilt top end only or complete overhaul?
 
After watching constant smoke out the exhaust I decided to perform a leak down and compression test on a cold engine. The leak down test resulted 2% or 5% depending how you want to read the gages. The compressions were done about a year ago and readings were about 190 psi on all 6 cyl. Finally ready to rebuild my 86 3.2 and the question is should I perform a top end over haul and skip the lower end? The engine has around 115k miles on it. This has to be the cleanest engine I have ever taken apart internally. The out side wasn't bad and oil drips were very minimal. Not enough to show evidence on the floor. Everything points to the valve guides (historically reading) although I don't seem to have a lot of play when moving the valve back and forth. Maybe valve seals all she needed? Is that possible? most of the engines that smoke at idle were due to valve seals. Also my plan was to remove the pistons and cylinders as assembly without separating them disturbing the rings. The liner looks new with no scratches and still the crosshatches visible. Non of the head bolts were broken although I believe the lower ones should be replaced. (historically reading) Back to the original question should I perform a complete overhaul? I have uploaded some pics that may provide some insight. THX

Andy

http://forums.pelicanparts.com/uploa...1324225915.jpg
stalactites in the exhaust port?

http://forums.pelicanparts.com/uploa...1324226011.jpg
combustion chamber

http://forums.pelicanparts.com/uploa...1324226252.jpg
cam shaft housing wear

http://forums.pelicanparts.com/uploa...1324226619.jpg
crosshatch in cylinder liner

http://forums.pelicanparts.com/uploa...1324226789.jpg
valve guide and seat

http://forums.pelicanparts.com/uploa...1324226853.jpg
engine underside

E Sully 12-18-2011 09:01 AM

I would rebuild just the top end. New guides and exhaust valves. If you have Alusil cylinders then your plan to leave as an assembly sounds good. If Nikasil I would put in new rings.
I rebuilt the top end on my 1986 engine with about 70,000 miles due to valve guides. It had Nikasil and I put in new rings. The bottom end did not need to be touched. It came out great and ran like new after break in.http://forums.pelicanparts.com/uploa...1324231043.jpg
http://forums.pelicanparts.com/uploa...1324231094.jpg

5String43 12-18-2011 09:31 AM

For what it's worth, when the engine in my car was pulled apart last year, it had 148,000 miles on it. The wrench inspected the bottom end and pronounced it perfect. So we did just the top -but that did include new rings, as well as rebuilding the heads. That has worked out very well. Here's hoping the same thing is true of your car's engine.

Joe Bob 12-18-2011 09:50 AM

I've done more than a few tops and never felt the need to split a case unless something is obviously wrong.

Going down low is an unnecessary expense unless you are adding displacement.

DRACO A5OG 12-18-2011 10:00 AM

Hey Dr. M!

So would you be willing to tutor me on a top end re-build some day?

J

El_Mecanico 12-18-2011 11:11 AM

My understanding is the cylinders on a 86 3.2 are Nickies? Would you need to run a honer prior to the ring installation for proper break in?

Flat6pac 12-18-2011 11:17 AM

You want to glaze break before reringing so you can get the oil up in the cylinders but I frown on reringing without doing the bottom end because with the heads done there is too much new on the top and the same old bottom.
Bruce

gregwils 12-18-2011 12:57 PM

You'll find this topic to be like religion. I had to do my motor for heavy oil consumption. BTW, it was like your motor - good compression, low leak down numbers, but loved to drink oil. I ended up doing the top-end, re-ringing and split the case to replace the intermediate bearings.

3.2's' can have niki's or alusil. You need to put a magnet on the cylinder wall - a slight magnetic draw means niki, none means alusil. If you have niki, pull one of the rings off, stick it in the cylinder as it would sit on a piston about two inches down from the top and measure the end gap to see if it's spec. Then you can make an informed decision about re-ringing. Edit: You can break the glaze with soap, water, a GREEN scotch brite pad and elbow grease. Honing the cylinder is way, way, way too rough a finish. Your original hone marks are showing, don't ruin them.

It's more work, but not that much more work to split the case, then you can inspect the mains to confirm the condition and clean all the journals. Bruce says "if the mains are good, then the rods are probably good". There is gobs of info on the Rebuilding Forum and lots of great people to provide guidance. Here was my thread from two years ago.

El_Mecanico 12-18-2011 04:59 PM

THX Greg thats awesome...this is my first Porsche engine drop and I have also armed myself with all the required books as you can see...lol. I just started reading your engine rebuilt and there is plenty of great info...THX for the link. Oh by the way the cylinder liners are magnetic...plus1.

THX Bruce for your advice...I hope I don't get to annoying with posts.

My 86 will be a project car and I'm thinking it will be completed in about a year or so. I will be working on the entire car including suspension and body. The car is in excellent shape but for some reason us Porsche lovers go nuts and are anal about things just got to be right.

I did buy this car from the original owner about 4 years ago...thats one of the reasons why I bought it. I figure when its all said and done this car will be well over 35k...lol. Its funny how so many folks in the forum just don't understand why we do it. This is truly a money pit...lol.


http://forums.pelicanparts.com/uploa...1324259568.jpg
BOOKS!!

http://forums.pelicanparts.com/uploa...1324259632.jpg
Current progress

http://forums.pelicanparts.com/uploa...1324259882.jpg
Before fixing whats not broken

Joeaksa 12-18-2011 06:05 PM

Personally I would not think of pulling the heads off without putting new rings in while you are in there. Same with valve guides and seals. Its just so much work getting to that point that for me I would not think twice about doing both.

Tippy 12-18-2011 06:13 PM

I'll never understand just doing a top end, there isn't much more to doing a whole, full rebuild.

Porsche Doc 12-18-2011 06:19 PM

Don't wish ya hada later...
 
Do it right!;) GO ALL IN... :)

500_19B 12-18-2011 07:56 PM

I am just past the half way point on a 3.2 rebuild (108K miles). After considering various opinions, I decided to split the case. As I am doing the work myself, it really does not add that much more cost in the context of a thorough top end (which, for me, includes new head studs). My intermediate shaft bearings were typically worn, so it was nice to take the opportunity to replace them.

Connecting rod bolts are a popular upgrade on Carrera motors, and that is greatly facilitated when you have the crank out (and for stretch-based tightening, as with ARP, it seems impossible to do those with the case not split...)

911pcars 12-18-2011 09:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tippy (Post 6441019)
I'll never understand just doing a top end, there isn't much more to doing a whole, full rebuild.

That depends on the definition of a "whole, full rebuild". You have heard about the slippery slope, yes?

In some circles, a full rebuild requires much more work to the crankcase once it comes apart. It can be much more than one would expect and not necessary in many cases.

Sherwood

porschenut 12-19-2011 10:05 AM

The bottom ends on these cars last forever. Doing the "full" rebuild can easily add thousands to the cost if you're paying a shop to do the whole thing. If this were my decision, I would not bother with the bottom end at only 115k, and that's even if I do all the disassembly/assembly myself.

El_Mecanico 12-19-2011 02:20 PM

I did a little research and added the cost to perform a lower case rebuilt resulting aprox 2k. This includes the following;

main bearings
rod bearing
intermediate bearings
chains
cam sprockets
intermediate sprockets
gaskets and seals
misc sealers and lubes
rod conditioning
crank shaft conditioning
chain ramps
race ware rod bolts

Do I need to renew these parts?

Im also planning having the heads reconditioned, new head studs, possibly re ringing the piston. Plus a transmission overhaul, shocks and struts and misc suspension bushings.

Please give me some further advice on the lower case overhaul.

Andy

TT Oversteer 12-19-2011 08:05 PM

Gonna keep it "forever"? I usually over do it then regret it when I sell or move on to the next project.

schulr 12-28-2011 07:59 PM

I too am facing a top end , have just been trying to avoid the cost. Any thoughts on cost for a budget? I am using a qt every 500 to 600 now and having more frequent injector clogging which may be a separate issue. Going to do a fuel treatment with BG 44k and see if that helps.

Bob

Tippy 12-28-2011 09:44 PM

Quote:

<div class="pre-quote">
Quote de <strong>Tippy</strong>
</div>

<div class="post-quote">
<div style="font-style:italic">I'll never understand just doing a top end, there isn't much more to doing a whole, full rebuild.</div>
</div>That depends on the definition of a "whole, full rebuild". You have heard about the slippery slope, yes?<br>
<br>
In some circles, a full rebuild requires much more work to the crankcase once it comes apart. It can be much more than one would expect and not necessary in many cases. <br>
<br>
Sherwood
I can understand the magnesium cases because they require 100% align-boring once split. But an aluminum case rebuild doesn't take long at all.

It only took me like a quarter to a fifth of the total time of the full rebuild to do the low-end.

911pcars 12-28-2011 10:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tippy (Post 6460123)
I can understand the magnesium cases because they require 100% align-boring once split. But an aluminum case rebuild doesn't take long at all.

It only took me like a quarter to a fifth of the total time of the full rebuild to do the low-end.

About 8 hrs.?

While aluminum crankcases are less problematic than the mag versions, a "rebuild" depends on how much detail you wish to perform.

In your case, did the main and con rod bearings need replacing? If so, how many miles? Did you perform any machining operations (e.g. rebuild con rods, polish crank, re-machine cylinder mount surface, other blue-printing operations, etc.).

Sherwood

Tippy 12-28-2011 10:56 PM

I replaced mains and rods but they were in spec - mileage unknown. IMS bearings have to be replaced 100%, another reason to do the low-end too. Yes, I reconditioned rods because that's required with new rod bolts 100% also. I did not machine cylinder to case flange. 8 hours is about right.

El_Mecanico 01-08-2012 03:44 PM

How about chain and sprockets? I figured once splitting the case it would cost me another 2k. That's including cylinder studs. Do I need to renew the lower studs even though no issues at this point? Now here is a good question. If the heads only last 100k would it not make sense to complete a top end only and a complete rebuild at 200k?

El_Mecanico 01-10-2012 06:39 PM

I removed all the cylinders and pistons and they look in great shape. I also removed #6 con-rod and the bearings look new however I noticed the bearing for the piston pin is discolored. Is this normal? should I proceed to split the case?

http://forums.pelicanparts.com/uploa...1326252790.jpg

http://forums.pelicanparts.com/uploa...1326253121.jpg

El_Mecanico 01-11-2012 06:53 PM

Well I went ahead and split the case and removed the lower cylinder studs. I did find three main bearings with some wear and the intermediate shaft bearings as expected. What caused it?

http://forums.pelicanparts.com/uploa...1326340383.jpg

El_Mecanico 01-16-2012 06:41 PM

Gosh...well I guess consensus's were 50/50...split the case or not. After splitting the case I came to the conclusion that it would had been better off not to. And the reason is cost. Although my conscience says go forward. What a PITA!!! I went ahead and cleaned it up nicely I will sink more mo money into this car. I come to the conclusion after all this work I should had bought a 2003 4s. It would had been cheaper. Luckily most of the work is performed by me. We are mostly likely in the same boat and that's why PP forum just keeps growing...lol

Andy

Reiver 01-16-2012 07:02 PM

Your 'internals' look great for that mileage. I suspect your oil pressure was also excellent prior to rebuild even tho you had the top end issue.
I've 217K miles on an unopened 3.0 and my oil pressure is like new spec wise. All of that bearing surface really does the job.
Great pics btw.

Pazuzu 01-17-2012 06:49 AM

I just finished this, the engine should go back in this weekend. 150K or so, I've been daily driving it for 4 years.

I had 4 broken studs. One ended up needing the help of a machine shop, since it broke flush.

I had ZERO machining done. Why bother? Everything was clean, and if one was willing to not crack the case, then it's not being machined anyways! Unless you have gouges or something, I wouldn't bother. That's me, there's some here who won't talk to me now because of that.

I split the case, replaced all bearings, the t-chains, all sprockets and guides, and the rod bolts (stock replacements). That and a tube of case sealant was the only extra expense as far as I was concerned. All of my bearings except for the intermediate shaft ones were 100 perfect, no scoring, scratches or wear. The IM shaft ones were worn, of course. the chain sprockets looked good, but clearly had wear compared to new ones. I did not replace the #8 bearing. Honestly, I could have put those bearings back in, they were that clean.

So, for how much more to crack the case?
About $650. From our host. I bet you could scrounge around and cut $150 off that.
In return, I know that I'll never have to crack it open again (well, at least for 30 more years...). even if I have to, all of that stuff can stay there, and it will cost me essentially nothing to do so.

I learned a ton about my engine, got to double and triple check that everything inside was super cool, got to really clean it well (which you just can't do when it's closed up). Got the head stud removed safely which would have been a bear with it still sealed. Got to check the piston squirters, which you can't so when it's sealed. Got to change the oil pump seals and check operation.

I don't know why anyone wouldn't crack the case.

Happy engine:


http://forums.pelicanparts.com/uploa...1326815130.jpg

Jesse16 01-17-2012 07:27 AM

At only 115m miles, top end only. Took 25 years to get that far ! Shame on you guys. Someone needs to drive this car some. I'd say after reading lots of these threads that the tipping point comes as you reach 200K miles. That will likely never happen with this car at the current miles/year rate.

El_Mecanico 01-17-2012 01:13 PM

Has anyone ever polished the case to a chrome finish look?

Reiver 01-17-2012 01:30 PM

I'm sure someone has but the question would be 'why'?

El_Mecanico 01-17-2012 01:32 PM

Something to do?lol

Reiver 01-17-2012 03:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by El_Mecanico (Post 6499615)
Something to do?lol

I'll send you my motor, you can rebuild it to keep yourself busy :)

porschenut 01-17-2012 03:11 PM

If I ever get so bored that I start thinking about chroming my engine case, shoot me.

El_Mecanico 01-17-2012 04:10 PM

There has to be someone out there! Send us your pics.

Reiver 01-17-2012 04:56 PM

Ok, then polish the intakes. You can hardly see the cases when everything is piled on top.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:53 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2025 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Pelican Parts Website


DTO Garage Plus vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.