Pelican Parts Forums

Pelican Parts Forums (http://forums.pelicanparts.com/)
-   Porsche 911 Technical Forum (http://forums.pelicanparts.com/porsche-911-technical-forum/)
-   -   SCCA STR Autocross Carrera Build (http://forums.pelicanparts.com/porsche-911-technical-forum/720521-scca-str-autocross-carrera-build.html)

DG624 08-07-2015 07:33 AM

Matt, Mitchell recommends 30/23 or 29/22mm T-bars for AutoX depending on the surface ...smaller for slicker surface bigger for smooth more grippy concrete. This was according to an article published in mid 90s but I don't think it will change much. He was also using 2 degrees of negative camber in front.

I have trouble getting much more than 2 degrees front or back. I was going to go to camber plates from Elephant.

Driven97 08-07-2015 08:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DG624 (Post 8743265)
Matt, Mitchell recommends 30/23 or 29/22mm T-bars for AutoX depending on the surface ...smaller for slicker surface bigger for smooth more grippy concrete. This was according to an article published in mid 90s but I don't think it will change much. He was also using 2 degrees of negative camber in front.

I have trouble getting much more than 2 degrees front or back. I was going to go to camber plates from Elephant.

That seems soft - I'm 23/33. When did bars bigger than 30mm come out?

I'm also above those camber levels. I'm about -2.5° up front (offset, small diameter bearing camber plates) and have more than -3° in the rear using Elephant Camber Max (which I now realize aren't needed to get that high.)

RichardNew 08-07-2015 08:31 AM

Dwight Mitchell was the man. I would start with his setup and work from that point. The technology hasn't changed that much. Ok, the new tires seem to like a little more negative camber but that may be it.

http://forums.pelicanparts.com/uploa...1438965027.jpg

Always copy the fast guys. That can save you a lot of time.

Richard Newton
Gauge Restoration

Bleedsblue 08-07-2015 09:18 AM

That looks like a true stagger, 16" up front and 17" out back. I almost ran that combo, but felt I barely have enough power at 5280ft to spin a sticky 225...

I got the 225/45/16 'Lops mounted, they fit w/ zero issues around "Euro" ride height. Interestingly, the 225/45 Z2 Star Spec I have has a narrower section width, but 0.5" wider tread width than 225/50. Top speed in 2nd should now be ~64mph.

SCCA auto-cross tomorrow, though I don't have enough time to really break these in properly. First auto-cross on real sticky tahrs!

DG624 08-11-2015 11:01 AM

His car is much lighter than yours so maybe a heavier Tbar is not so bad. I have not been able to get more than 2.5 degrees from the rear suspension. I guess it depends on the shop doing the aligning.

Driven97 09-22-2015 06:53 AM

Well, I've been autocrossing for 18 years now and finally took my first trip out to the Big Show - SCCA Solo Nationals.

I made a promise to myself long ago never to have a car that needs a trailer. My Dad and I hopped in the 911 and drove the 800 miles (each way!) to Lincoln, Ne. Other than wearing earplugs to reduce fatigue, car was a treat. This country is beautiful, that was my first trip to the plains.

SCCA Autocross Nationals is the largest motorsports competition in the world, with over 1,200 competitors this year. The event is split into four days, STR was scheduled to run the last two. We showed up on day 2 to get acclimated. Let me tell you, it's a sight to behold. I'm used to a big event being 200 people, 6x that is tough to take in at first. Once getting checked in we wandered over to the area of the courses - there's two. On one course we saw (and heard!) an Audi R8 V10 and a McLaren 12C. Big dollar CAM cars were running on the other course - including Mary Pozzi's car that was modeled in GranTurismo 6, Al Unser Jr and Robbie Unser, and a legitimate, real Shelby Cobra. What have we gotten ourselves into? Who cares! It's awesome!

That evening I purchased some runs on the practice course, which is intended for people to dial their cars into the surface. I had elected to switch rear tire brands - from RE71R to Rival-S - just before the event. I wanted full tread tires in case we hit rain on the trip (which we did) for safety. I preferred driving on the Rival-S due to their more progressive nature, but mixing brands was a bad idea. The car was slightly loose at steady state, where it's been mild understeer all year. I've had transitional issues with the car since day 1, which I've learned to drive around. But the big issue was turn in. The car was spooky there. In retrospect, I think the more responsive Bridgestone was reacting much faster than the laggy Rival, making the car feel very unsure of itself. Coupled with the mild oversteer, I more was fighting to survive runs rather than being able to attack the course. I decided to run a little extra front pressure to try and reduce the oversteer, I have no other adjustments on my car easily available.

The event itself works like this:
Day 1 you do 3 runs on one course.
Day 2 you do 3 runs on the other course.
Best run on each side are added.

So yes, I basically drove 1600 miles for 6 minutes of seat time. And I can't wait to do it again next year.

Run day 1 arrived. Pulling into grid with 62(!) STR entries is insane - that's a lot of competitors! Mostly S2000s, a lot of 3rd gen Miatas, and only a few oddballs - 1 Z3 coupe, an MR-S, 2 370zs, and a few older Miatas. My car was the oldest in STR by 13 years. The West course on day 1 was tight, narrow, and technical. I went out on a "recon" first run to make sure I had a clean one in the books. The car was even more twitchy and loose than it was on the practice course. Good thing I did the recon run, as I hit cones on runs 2 and 3. Wait, it's half over already?

https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-I...PB1_2828-1.jpg

Day 2 was a much faster and wide open course. Car was still spooky loose, I spun my first run. Then I spun my 2nd. 1 run left to get a clean one - popped the safety chute and got through the course slow and conservative, but clean.

https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-C...PB1_2834-1.jpg

Video of my runs.

Result? 50th. Out of 62. Well, not last I guess. Against the best in the country, I guess I should be happy. Not quite. Pretty sure any 911 isn't going to have a shot at the title, but I'm not going to be satisfied until I earn a trophy. I think it's possible. For next year I'm bringing some real shock damping, some adjustability so I can tweak the car if needed, and, uh, matched tires. And more seat time. Hopefully that can bring me into the top half. Then onward and upward.

Goofing around with my 911 these last few years has far and away been the most challenging, rewarding, and fun I've had playing the autocross game. While going as far as I have with the car is up to you, I highly recommend at least getting out to a local event and playing with your car.

DG624 09-22-2015 12:36 PM

Matt it looked like a very wide open course. The spins seem to be on exit. Did you adjust anything day to day or run to run?

I was thinking of going to custom Bilstein adjustable shocks. Do you have a good choice for your shocks yet?

Driven97 09-23-2015 03:32 AM

That was really a bit of my problem - very little on my car is adjustable. All I did (and really could do) was run higher front tire pressure.

You know, the car is temperamental. It seems pretty consistent on asphalt. On heavily weathered & cracked, relatively new, even sealcoated lots it's about the same. Concrete though is a crapshoot. At Toledo the car has never felt good - slightly spooky, inconsistent, usually either loose or snappy. Up at Oscoda, it was rather pushy. At Wilmington it's felt really good - on the push side of balanced, which is exactly where I want it so I can attack the course.

As for shocks, funny you should ask:
https://lh4.googleusercontent.com/-n...922_170432.jpg

These showed up at my door about 8:00pm just this Monday.

Nearly every single person that has driven my car has mentioned that it needs shocks. Well, that time has finally come, at least in the rear. Double adjustable. I put them in last night and drove a grand total of 15 minutes on them. All I know for sure is that both full soft is too soft, both full firm is pretty punishing on the street. But man, this is the body control I've been missing. Huge, HUGE improvement. Can't wait to see what they feel like in competition, though figuring out how to dial them in is going to be a tough process.

BRAIDusa 09-23-2015 05:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Driven97 (Post 8806427)
That was really a bit of my problem - very little on my car is adjustable. All I did (and really could do) was run higher front tire pressure.

You know, the car is temperamental. It seems pretty consistent on asphalt. On heavily weathered & cracked, relatively new, even sealcoated lots it's about the same. Concrete though is a crapshoot. At Toledo the car has never felt good - slightly spooky, inconsistent, usually either loose or snappy. Up at Oscoda, it was rather pushy. At Wilmington it's felt really good - on the push side of balanced, which is exactly where I want it so I can attack the course.

As for shocks, funny you should ask:
https://lh4.googleusercontent.com/-n...922_170432.jpg

These showed up at my door about 8:00pm just this Monday.

Nearly every single person that has driven my car has mentioned that it needs shocks. Well, that time has finally come, at least in the rear. Double adjustable. I put them in last night and drove a grand total of 15 minutes on them. All I know for sure is that both full soft is too soft, both full firm is pretty punishing on the street. But man, this is the body control I've been missing. Huge, HUGE improvement. Can't wait to see what they feel like in competition, though figuring out how to dial them in is going to be a tough process.

Great write up Matt and good job representing our cars. You know, if you want to solve your handling issues just switch to rallycross; all that stuff up there is irrelevant LOL

Driven97 09-28-2015 03:58 AM

Did my first event on the Hotbits rear shocks yesterday and thought I'd drop a quick review.

I had a co-driver who is pretty good at setting up cars, but we only had 8 runs between the two of us.

First of all, holy cow, body control is amazing. My car was really, really bad in out-of-phase type maneuvers - that is, when putting an opposite input in from the way the mass is transferring. Aka slalom or lane change type maneuvers. I previously had to waste tons of time (and therefore sacrifice speed) waiting for the rear weight to stop moving before I could put in an opposite input and have any idea what the car would do. No more. In slalom type moves, the rear end set, planted, and stuck. Like a real, modern car. The effect was so night an day, it took me the whole event building confidence in the car and I still didn't reach the limit. Impressive!

The bad news is we threw the balance off everywhere else. The car picked up a LOT of understeer, in basically all three phases of a corner. That's confusing, as the stiffer shocks should have reduced rear grip. Best guess is that before the uncontrolled rear flopping around was upsetting the tires, causing oversteer.

We also found out what overshooting on compression damping does - creates a nasty oscillation / hop in sweepers.

Can't wait to get proper damping in my fronts.

I'm going to need a notebook.

Elombard 09-28-2015 05:08 AM

hey checked your web site for more details on the shocks. did not see anything. Do you have link you would share?

their website is having some problems - will check back later.

Driven97 09-28-2015 05:59 AM

Yeah, I haven't put up a blog post about them yet. I'm a slacker.

See this thread for more info about the Hotbits shocks.

Driven97 07-18-2016 04:58 AM

Just to have some closure on this thread, I'm calling this project complete.

I got the car about where I want it handling wise. It's a riot to drive. It rotates at will, digs deep in sweepers, and plants and goes like a 911 should. It's fast enough to place well at local events.

Nationally, I'm still well off the pace of the S2000s, and the new ND Miatas that just got put into STR are already starting to supercede those with minimal development. So I'm getting further behind. The newer cars are much, much more stable and easy to extract speed at the 9.999/10ths you need to be at to be nationally competitive.

Watching video from my first runs with the car to today are hilarious. My car was pretty stock when I bought it, the thing could barely get out of it's own way.

The process of figuring things out for myself was super rewarding and a great life experience. The car is a magnet for people, I've met virtually everyone on the national circuit because of it. Pretty cool. So many compliments too.

Some shots of what will likely be it's 2nd to last National autocross:

https://lh6.googleusercontent.com/-6...sburghLift.jpg

This was a large bump on course that apparently threw the car in the air. Neat!

https://lh6.googleusercontent.com/-W...rghStaring.jpg

Found a track rat '86 and couldn't resist taking this photo. Talked to the owner for a minute, always cool to meet a fellow 911 driver.

And it's new retired self:

https://lh4.googleusercontent.com/-L...525_180204.jpg

I'll probably content the car a bit with slightly less aggressive torsion bars and the quieter OE exhaust, but the rest of the stuff is staying. I'll likely still drive the car at local events just because it's so darn fun (and challenging) to drive hard. I drove the car to and from every event as far as 800 miles away and back with minimal incidents (1 dead DME relay, 1 starter that stopped working when hot) which would be an accomplishment for many more modern cars, let alone a 32 year old classic. What a great, great car.


Final setup in case anyone wants to copy, in order of importance:

245-17 square Rival S tires on 9" wheels all around
23/36 torsions (would do 24mm fronts if I continued with the car. Just can't get enough spring for the grip of modern street tires.)
ER revalved front / Hotbits double adjustable rear shocks
Addco 22.2mm OE style big front swaybar
No rear swaybar
KAAZ limited slip
Modified cheapie eBay front camber plates
Delrin A-arm bushings and spring plate bushings
SW chip / homemade exhaust
Bunch of other stuff that's less important

What I would have liked:
Lighter wheels
A much shorter 2nd gear (illegal in STR)
About 200lb off the rear of the car (illegal in STR)
A bigger front swaybar (would have to be a custom STR legal piece)

So if anyone in the future stumbles on this thread, feel free to PM me or whatever with any questions. I'm more than willing to share anything I've learned along the way for autocross prep. Most likely I can say I've tried that to most of the common stuff.

RichardNew 07-18-2016 07:34 AM

Most of us are really too quick to start playing with shocks. Koni and Bilstein both feel that shocks are the final step in chassis tuning. You have to get the spring (torsion bar) package correct first. Shocks are precision devices and should be used for that final step.

Here's an article I wrote on all of this.

http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-wsoqhUFuKo...0/Shock+4w.jpg

Richard Newton

Driven97 07-18-2016 07:42 AM

Thanks Richard. Pretty sure you're a bot that just searches for keywords and plugs your blog with marginally relevant things, but whatever. That pic isn't even a 911.

I asked Chuck @ Elephant to valve shocks to my specifications, which were quite a bit different than his canned tune. He told me to take a long walk off a short pier.

The double adjustable Hotbits I bought for the rear massively improved the car, plus gave me the ability to tweak to match surface / course / conditions. Adjustability is a two-way sword though, you've got to know what to do with it, and you have to be methodical, or there's a good chance you can make things really, really bad.

Especially with seat time in 60 second bursts, it was real work to get them dialed in. And that's just one end of the car!

winders 07-18-2016 07:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Driven97 (Post 9203427)
Thanks Richard. Pretty sure you're a bot that just searches for keywords and plugs your blog with marginally relevant things, but whatever. That pic isn't even a 911.

And the blogs articles are mostly fluff and don't really provide much useful information.

Driven97 07-18-2016 07:51 AM

You click on them? Shame on you.,

Elombard 07-18-2016 08:21 AM

Wow I thought Richard New was legit..never took the time to go to his site....glad I didn't.

I wonder if part of the problem with STR for the air cooled 911 is that the rules wont allow you to add bracing and so the chassis is flexing as much as the T bars are deflecting?

Great fun to read about and watch your progress. Are you going to get a new car to campaign nationally?

Bleedsblue 07-18-2016 08:32 AM

Hey Matt, I'm very grateful to you for documenting the extent of this build and your experience, and especially following up with a sort of 'national-event wrap-up.' It's been a great read and very informative for a noob like myself.

msterling 07-18-2016 11:45 AM

Hey Matt,

It was nice to meet you last Sat. at Pitt Race. I have learned a lot about my similar car by following your threads and your Blog. You have put a major effort into making your car competitive in a Porsche Hostile class. You are not afraid to dig into technical stuff that uses actual math skills. BTW, I think you could earn a living as a writer.

Attached is a picture of your car hitting that same bump.
http://forums.pelicanparts.com/uploa...1468870745.jpg

and looking sharp at starting line.
http://forums.pelicanparts.com/uploa...1468870902.jpg


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:27 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2025 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Pelican Parts Website


DTO Garage Plus vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.