|
|
|
|
| Author |
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: cinti.ohio
Posts: 123
|
3.6 intercooler
Hello ,is the 3.6 intercooler more efficient than the Kolkelm for a upgraded 88 3.3 turbo? thanks for any information..jer
|
||
07-13-2002, 02:56 PM
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 3,563
|
The C2T Intercooler is slightly wider than the Kokeln unit and therefore has more surface area for charge air distribution, which theoretically should be more efficient at cooling the intake air.
The Kokeln unit has a thicker core and therefore would have less pressure drop across the core, but only marginal. If you go the C2T IC route, you'll have to remove your AirCon condensor from your turbo tail to accommodate the C2T unit. The Kokeln is designed to fit in the factory location and retains the factory air-con condensor. Just depends whether you want to go aftermarket or stick with factory components. The Kokeln looks nicer and is probably more readily available than the C2T unit. Hope this helps. |
||
|
07-13-2002, 06:27 PM
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: cinti.ohio
Posts: 123
|
3.6 intercooler
Thanks for the information that's just what I wanted to know...regards jer
|
||
|
07-14-2002, 04:23 AM
|
|
