Pelican Parts Forums

Pelican Parts Forums (http://forums.pelicanparts.com/)
-   Porsche 911 Technical Forum (http://forums.pelicanparts.com/porsche-911-technical-forum/)
-   -   One for A/C guru's... (http://forums.pelicanparts.com/porsche-911-technical-forum/745965-one-c-gurus.html)

kuehl 04-25-2013 10:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by wwest (Post 7407118)
According to Kuehl instead of the cost and effort of replacing the old "non-barrier" hoses your money and/or time might be better spent

[/url]

Sorry dude. WRONG.
What we say is replace the hoses and add the low high pressure switch.

LOL Wwest, I don't mind your Plagiarism, however at least get it right.

SilberUrS6 04-25-2013 10:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kuehl (Post 7407163)
Sorry dude. WRONG.
What we say is replace the hoses and add the low high pressure switch.

LOL Wwest, I don't mind your Plagiarism, however at least get it right.

Ignore the stuff that doesn't fit my conclusion, and make up stuff to support my conclusion.

Yup, the wwest way.

kuehl 04-25-2013 10:35 AM

;)

wwest 04-25-2013 10:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kuehl (Post 7407163)
Sorry dude. WRONG.
What we say is replace the hoses and add the low high pressure switch.

Yes, you did, have, but(***)

LOL Wwest, I don't mind your Plagiarism, however at least get it right.

Sorry, but your record SPEAKS for itself.

***You have also stated, perfectly logically and correctly, that for legacy systems that have a HPRV valve then the use of the binary pressure switch when switching over to R-134a is a requirement.

I have found HPRV valves currently available that have a "BO" setting of 450PSI. That means, obviously that even with R-12 The system components must be protected when or if pressures exceed 450 PSI.

Simply taking your own perfectly logical statement to a further logical conclusion???

R-12 non-barrier hoses were used throughout the industry, but seeming their intergrety against leadage was good all the way to 450PSI, or at worse, 350PSI. Plus the EPA has now gone on record stating that switching to R134 did not require "barrier" hoses after all.

wwest 04-25-2013 11:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SilberUrS6 (Post 7407173)
Ignore the stuff that doesn't fit my conclusion, and make up stuff to support my conclusion.

Yup, the wwest way.

"..make up stuff..."

You might want to check the truth of the statement before accusing me of making up stuff.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:34 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2025 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Pelican Parts Website


DTO Garage Plus vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.