|
|
|
|
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2015
Posts: 62
|
1974 911s
Hello All,
I am new to this forum... I am in the process buying this 1974 911S. Needs your expertises, watch out things I should know. Also, is this year and model Good for future modification and investment? What is today ave. Price range for this car? I am looking at the car has about 140k miles and Body Condition good but need repaint. Mechanic sounds Good and strong with no grinding gear when shifting. Thanks and appreciated your helps! Chapter ![]()
|
||
|
|
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2015
Posts: 62
|
Hi Pmax,
The owner said there is some rock chips if I want to repaint the whole car later on. What is the Pros and Cons for this year and model? It's a 2.7L motor. I don't know anything about this year and model. Anyone, who has the same year and model provide some inside about this car will be greatly appreciated. |
||
|
|
|
|
Vintage Owner
|
Since this car was built before Porsche started using galvanized metal, check carefully for rust. 74 was the last year of the traditional style exhaust, so that's a plus.
I'd agree that a PPI is the best money you can spend on this car.
__________________
84 Targa (sold) 70 914-6 (sold) 73 914-6 2.7 conversion (sold) 75 GMC Motorhome (sold) 2016 Cayenne |
||
|
|
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2015
Posts: 62
|
Thanks Jack,
I will inspect carefully on the body rust...Anything good about 1974 911s 2.7L engine and the tran.? Does this engine has cooling problem? Engine overheat? |
||
|
|
|
|
Registered
|
Chapter:
PPI = Pre-Purchase Inspection by a qualified Porsche mechanic. This particular vintage of 911 is prone to rust if not well-kept. The 2.7 engine is "highly variable" and is difficult for someone not familiar with these to determine condition. I strongly recommend finding a non-partial Porsche shop to evaluate this car for you. Be wary if the car's owner is not interested in participating in a PPI. The picture you have clearly shows the back end of the car painted a different shade of white than the passenger door and front fender. This, to me, appears to be more than "rock chips". Has the car been wrecked and rebuilt? Is maintenance history available for this car? Someone once told me (and they were right!) to not buy a Porsche until I could afford two. |
||
|
|
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2015
Posts: 62
|
Thanks Fanaudical,
The owner did said the car has some rock chips but Body straight And fast never been in an accident before. All Gear has no grinding, motor strong, and no rust. He did said, will be nice to repaint it later. He is selling to me for $24k OTD. I hope it's a good price and I have agreed with the sell purchase agreement. Just keep my fingers cross. I will test drive before final settlement on the car. It's an 911s according to the Vin Number he gave me. When I decode the Vin number. It's an 911s but not 911s US version So I don't know what the different between 911s and 911s US spec. 911s spec. Said about 175hp and none "s" is about 150hp. Thanks |
||
|
|
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Capistrano Beach, Ca.
Posts: 7,235
|
Quote:
To be a little more specific about your questions, the 74 is generally prized for a mid-year car because it did not have the heat producing emissions on the exhaust nor the 5 blade fan so the engine was not subject to extreme heat which often caused loosening of studs in the mag case. As said before, these were not galvanized and rust will be a concern. Do not take a seller's guarantee that the car is rust free (unless he means he is not charging extra for the rust.) You need an expert on early cars to inspect the car, in person, to really determine the extent of any rust. One other thing. The car appears to be low mileage which can be a good thing and a bad thing. If it is original and never been worked on, it still may be in very good shape but has not had the "upgrades" many 2.7 engine got--time certs for the head studs. The bad reputation of mid-year cars has been virtually erased over the years by the fact that most have been resolved through rebuilds. This may or may not apply to your car.
__________________
L.J. Recovering Porsche-holic Gave up trying to stay clean Stabilized on a Pelican I.V. drip |
||
|
|
|
|
Registered
|
The '74 is the best year of the mid-years. $24k is steep, but not if the engine has had it's head studs upgraded with time-certs, & the transmission has had it's synchros and sliders replaced. Then there's still suspension rubber and brakes to go through. At 140k miles it will need all of that, especially if you plan to drive it hard.
-C
__________________
Bone stock 1974 911S Targa. 1972 914/4 Race Car |
||
|
|
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2015
Posts: 62
|
Thanks guys for your inputs.
I want to post more photos of the car but I don't know how upload in this thread. Can someone help me how to. Chapter |
||
|
|
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Main Line, PA
Posts: 1,226
|
I'd say you get are getting in over your head.
__________________
1985 911 3.2 Carrera Coupe - Constant Project - 2550lbs 2005 E46 M3- Daily Beater - 3350lbs |
||
|
|
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2015
Posts: 62
|
Some photos were taken from the owner.
The car looks pretty good and no rust underneath the body. Can't wait to pick it up |
||
|
|
|
|
Fb = M/S
|
The prices are rising, but I would say that $24,000 seems a bit on the high side. A respray is $5-10,000. Look at the Pelican Classifieds and look for a similar recent model and condition to get an idea on prices. Also go to Haggerty's web page which will give you a range based on condition. Get the PPI done and see what items need attention and use that to negotiate your price. Good luck.
__________________
1981 911SC, Guards Red/Black Leather 2014 Audi A6 Prestige, Phantom Black Pearl/Black Leather, Black Optics 2017 Tesla Model X Gone but not forgotten: 1969 Datsun 2000, 1973 914 1.7, 1976 912E |
||
|
|
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2015
Posts: 62
|
Price is a bit high comparison with others but owner said mechanically
this car is good, run strong, fast and body is straight no accident (very much) original) I am hoping the only fix I will do is Cosmetics and repaint job. Price is raising make me can't afford them anymore if I continue to wait . |
||
|
|
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Main Line, PA
Posts: 1,226
|
Quote:
Walk away now. If you can't afford a nice one, you reallly can't afford a cheap one.
__________________
1985 911 3.2 Carrera Coupe - Constant Project - 2550lbs 2005 E46 M3- Daily Beater - 3350lbs |
||
|
|
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2015
Posts: 62
|
Thanks TheSt!G.
|
||
|
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 750
|
I would take a close look at the passenger-side front corner. It looks like the bumper bellow is distorted and the fender/door gap is pretty tight. Possible front end collision?
Tim K |
||
|
|
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2015
Posts: 62
|
Hard to tell from
The angle of the photo was taken. I haven't see the car I person yet to determine. |
||
|
|
|
|
Bollweevil
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Fulshear, Texanistan
Posts: 3,361
|
The two main issues with the 2.7L engines are pulled head studs and worn valve guides. If you have pulled head studs, I suspect you are looking at a $10K+ for a complete rebuild and probably 1/2 of that for new valve job by the time the "while you are in there" $$ are added in. I'm sure some others can give you more exact figures but neither is an inexpensive fix.
A lot depends on where and how they were driven. If driven hard in the hot weather states the problems are much more likely, i.e. my valve guides were shot at 80K miles. No sign of pulled studs but I went ahead and had a full rebuild done with time certs, etc. Having the 11 bladed fan and no thermal reactors '74s are less prone for the above problems but certainly not immune. This was in 1989 so what I paid then for the rebuild has no relevance today. Do yourself a big favor... at least have a PPI done on the engine and have a careful inspection done for rust else you may really regret not having done so.
__________________
Jack 74 911 Coupe 2.7L - K21 Option - S suspension |
||
|
|
|
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2015
Posts: 62
|
Thank you Jack for the info.
I have 930 88' and 993 97' both are great cars And looking to add this 74' to the family But what I heard so far let me a big concern on buying this car now. Hmmmm..... |
||
|
|
|
|
Bollweevil
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Fulshear, Texanistan
Posts: 3,361
|
A good PPI will help solve the riddle... don't blow it off because of what might be wrong with it. It may be a great car?? I personally really like the '74 and mine is just a base 911 with the "S" suspension upgrades.
__________________
Jack 74 911 Coupe 2.7L - K21 Option - S suspension |
||
|
|
|