![]() |
Frank,
According the folks at Jerry Woods Enterprises, the spring plate mount gives you a more linear and more appropriate motion ratio as the suspension moves. In other words, mounting to the spring plate is better than mounting to the trailing arm. |
The sway bar mounts to the spring plate by replacing the eccentric adjuster with an eccentric bolt as shown in this diagram:
http://elephantracing.com/documents/911%20Rear%20Swaybar.pdf |
I've got some new Tarett 22mm RSR style bars available in case it helps you. The rear is an early bolt spacing. Bought them but decided not to use them.
|
Quote:
There was a bit of discussion a while back on the drop-link topic as well: http://forums.pelicanparts.com/porsche-911-technical-forum/713360-adjustable-rear-drop-link-attachment.html |
Quote:
I use Tarett sway bars on my race car. I have to use the trailing arm mount because of the raised spring plate front (chassis) mount on my car. The drop links would run into the frame rails if I used spring plate mounts. I had to get custom drop links from Tarett and mess around with spacers to get everything setup so the heim joints would not bind. I would have had no issues if I could have used the spring plate mounts. |
Don't the aluminum trailing arms have a different shock angle than the 70 steel ones? I think they may require some machining there too. There are clearance issues at the top shock mount.
|
You are correct RSTarga. Go to post #20 and it explains how to go about achieving the proper angle and clearance. There are a couple ways to do it and I plan on doing the one that requires removing 1".
|
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:01 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2025 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Pelican Parts Website