![]() |
Leakdown / Compression Question
Looking at a 68 912. Compression came back 172 across both banks. Leak Down was 29%
How bad is that leak down number? How does that compression number look? |
Ugg. I cringe whenever I read about leakdown reports like that, because it isn't the whole story. Leakage of 29% is excessive, and mechanic should have told you what is leaking, intake, exhaust, or crankcase. Also, is it 29% across the board, or was that the worst cylinder?
If he is saying all cylinders are exactly 172/29% I'd say tend to think report is BS. |
172, I would drive it and not be too concerned about the leak down.
I would think it would be hard to get 172 with a 29 leak down. just my opinion, I don't or have not done a lot of leak down, just compression |
Quote:
|
I think the important result is that the pressures are even across the cylinders, not the actual number. In any event, I'm no expert but doesn't 172 psi sound high?
|
I don't think you can get 172 psi from a 912 engine. The compression rate is not that high. Secondly, if there is 27% leakage, it would be hard to get 172 psi from that cylinder.
The evidence is not complete but as it is right now, it points to a test performed incorrectly. |
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:17 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2025 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Pelican Parts Website