![]() |
|
|
|
Registered
|
Early Heat Exchangers
ok......this coming year i plan to replace the heat exchangers on my 78 911SC with the much praised early type...i believe these to be pre '73......am i correct and what specific part no.s i should look for as i don't want to be sold the wrong (later) thing...i know the forums here have gone into lengths about this subject but i haven't seen a reference to part no.s....i plan to use a two into two outlet exhaust
|
||
![]() |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: N. Phoenix AZ USA
Posts: 28,943
|
Bones,
Considering that you live in the UK, your choices are many. You can still find the old style HE (heat exchangers) from time to time as well as those from SSI, Dankse as well as others. The stock units normally would be a bit less expensive but will always suffer from rust. Another thing to think about is how long you plan on keeping the car. If you plan on keeping it for a long time, I would go with units made out of stainless steel. The weather and winters in Europe are rough on HE's and using stainless steel would mean that they would never rust out again, a big plus for most people. This also adds value to your car if you were to sell in the future. All of the firms who make a HE for the 911 have an example of the "early style" HE as well as the 2 into 1 muffler needed to work with this conversion. I made it on my 85 3.2 and it really made the car nice to drive. Joe
__________________
2013 Jag XF, 2002 Dodge Ram 2500 Cummins (the workhorse), 1992 Jaguar XJ S-3 V-12 VDP (one of only 100 examples made), 1969 Jaguar XJ (been in the family since new), 1985 911 Targa backdated to 1973 RS specs with a 3.6 shoehorned in the back, 1959 Austin Healey Sprite (former SCCA H-Prod), 1995 BMW R1100RSL, 1971 & '72 BMW R75/5 "Toaster," Ural Tourist w/sidecar, 1949 Aeronca Sedan / QB Last edited by Joeaksa; 12-16-2002 at 06:07 AM.. |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
|
2 into 1/
what's so important then about a 2 into 1 exhaust as there are plenty of people offering 2 into two's (which obviously means modifying the rear valance) but technically surely a 2 into 2 is every bit as good as a 2 into 1 so long as it is designed correctly......further thoughts greatly appreciated
|
||
![]() |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: N. Phoenix AZ USA
Posts: 28,943
|
2 into 2 people are usually looking for a bit more noise and hoping that more power comes with it. You might flow a bit more out the 2 into 2 setup but doubt that it would result in a great HP gain unless you were at full throttle most of the time and the rest of your motor was tweaked already.
Best I can recommend is to keep your eyes open and if you find/hear a 911 whose sound you like, flag them down and see what type of system they have. I am using the SSI pre-73 HE with a stock Porsche "banana" muffler and am very happy with its performance and sound. Will be switching the muffler out with a used Danske stainless unit shortly but only because I got a good deal on it. If its too loud, the stock unit will go back on! I do not want to start cutting on my rear valence, so the 2 into 2 is not a factor for me. Got enough HP to make me smile already! Joe
__________________
2013 Jag XF, 2002 Dodge Ram 2500 Cummins (the workhorse), 1992 Jaguar XJ S-3 V-12 VDP (one of only 100 examples made), 1969 Jaguar XJ (been in the family since new), 1985 911 Targa backdated to 1973 RS specs with a 3.6 shoehorned in the back, 1959 Austin Healey Sprite (former SCCA H-Prod), 1995 BMW R1100RSL, 1971 & '72 BMW R75/5 "Toaster," Ural Tourist w/sidecar, 1949 Aeronca Sedan / QB |
||
![]() |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Lacey, WA. USA
Posts: 25,310
|
The "two-in" style is the way to go, because of exhaust tuning and backpressure reasons. It's not pre-73 you're looking for , it's pre-75. IN fact the '74 had arguably the best of all Porsche exhaust systems. Equal length headers made of stainless steel. Previous years were all iron, post '74 systems were 1-in 1-out.
__________________
Man of Carbon Fiber (stronger than steel) Mocha 1978 911SC. "Coco" |
||
![]() |
|