![]() |
|
|
|
Registered
|
Change my 75 911 with a 95 M3?
I have the opportunity to change my 75 911 with a 95 M3. Never drove a M3, can anybody tell me if its a good trade?
![]() |
||
![]() |
|
Montana 911
|
if you do expect to be called a trader! Ha Ha...just kidding, it's all up to you.
__________________
H.D. Smith 2009 997.2 S 3.8 PDK 2019 Ford Ranger Lariat FX4 Baby Raptor 2019 Can Am Renegade 1000R XC 2020 Yamaha YFZ450R |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 32
|
I did the same thing one time. I had a 73 911S that I sold and bought a 95 M3. Its not a 911. Needles to say I'm back. The M3 is a wonderful car, comfy and quick. I guess it was such a huge change from my early S that I felt too comfortable. It seemed like I was too detached from the road or something. My car was all stock. I guess if you stiffen up the suspension and make a few easy modifications it would be an even better ride. Just my opinion.
|
||
![]() |
|
Friend of Warren
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Lincoln, NE
Posts: 16,492
|
do a search on here regarding M3's. I know there are a couple of threads regarding how people like/dislike driving them.
__________________
Kurt V No more Porsches, but a revolving number of motorcycles. |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Washington DC
Posts: 619
|
Almost did a similar trade on an E36 M3 about a year ago. If you feel the M3 is the right car for you, go for it. If not, stick with the 911. Whichever option you choose, however, recognize that you will be driving a 911 in six months either way.
![]() Very comfortable, semi-quick, great daily driver. "Disconnected" from the road and very heavy (compared to a 75 911, at least). I felt that I wouldnt be happy trading for an E36 M3 because the car seemed so uninspired to me - its one big compromise - half sports car, half sedan - and for that reason I decieded against it.
__________________
96 993 88 911 (Sold) 87 951 (Sold) |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
|
Ditto to the previous comments. M3 is great grand tourer - comfy, fast and easy to drive --- and kind of dull. If you need a dual purpose car that can carry some passengers or some, the M3 is it. The 911 is a different car entirely. My $0.02
Rich
__________________
2004 GT-3 1969 911E 1988 944 Turbo 1990 BMW 325i 2001 BMW Z3 |
||
![]() |
|
![]() |
Registered
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Kansas City, MO USA
Posts: 595
|
Get both! I had a E36 M3 and loved it but needed more room and to get around in the snow better, so I bought Lexus LX470. I still have my 911. I will always have a 911 of some sort!!!!
__________________
80 930 67 Triumph TR4a irs 72 DeTomaso Pantera 75 911 3.3 Turbo Cab*SOLD 5-11-04 73 911T Went Up in a Blaze Glory, 76 Early Ford Bronco |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
|
I'd have to disagree on the M3 being dull thing people are saying. I drove a 97 M3 for 3 years before I got my 73 911S. They're definitely apples and oranges - M3 is a bit more powerful, handles amazingly well, seats 5, has a trunk for the luggage, good A/C and heat, comfy, quiet, reliable, a real all-star. The 73 is a bit slower, handles and feels like a go kart, all top end, loud, seats 2 adults, maybe 3 if one of you is into yoga, tiny trunk, terrible A/C, slightly smelly heat, sorta comfy, not as reliable as the M3. If I could chose a comfy and affordable 2nd car (I live in NYC, so having *1* car is really a luxury) the E36 M3 would definitely be high on the list, I loved mine!
All that being said, don't ask us, do drive one ![]() Brad
__________________
73 911S Coupe sold |
||
![]() |
|
D idn't E arn I t
|
Only if it's a straight across trade...
![]()
__________________
AOC/Hogg 2028 |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
|
So, I will probably drive the car next week. My second son has just arrived, so I need more room. Saying that, I am towards getting a half sports, half sedan. And probably I will have some U$ back, old porsches are rare here in Brazil.
So decided that I will trade, another question. Are the M3 reliable, can I use it with no concern? And, tks for the repleis, guys. |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Indiana
Posts: 4,553
|
Just for fun...post this on the BMW board.
__________________
Keeper of the Titanium Monkey 1975 911S (sold) 1973 911 w/3.2 (sold) 1983 911SC targa (sold) Looking for a 987.2 or 981 Cayman |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Washington DC
Posts: 619
|
Yes they are reliable. The S50 engine in the 95 M3's has a pretty good reputation for long life (responds well to mods too). There are a few E36 problem areas that you will want to have looked at - but the car will cost considerably less than an early 911 to maintain.
The 95's had a plastic impeller in the water pump that needs to be changedout with a metal one. Usually, buy this age, most owners have already done this. Also, the radiator neck has a tendency to crack. Thats about it. The rear suspension setup has been known to give people problems, but overall I would say the cars are extremely reliable and maintenance free. EDIT: Just thought of this - You are in Brazil? I would assume the M3 would be Euro spec as opposed to US spec - in that case, I would jump on it - WAY more power (240HP/286HP I think). Hell, if you dont like it, you could turn around and sell it in the US for twice what its worth. Euro M3's are extremely desireable here among the BMW crowd. Try this site for more info: www.bimmerforums.com
__________________
96 993 88 911 (Sold) 87 951 (Sold) |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Glyndon MD
Posts: 327
|
stuttgart951 is right, the American market E36 M3s were really just hot-rod E36 coupes compared to the ROW version of the M3, which had an entirely different intake system among other things and at least an extra 40hp. The current M3 is the same everywhere. If you really want something more comparable to a 911, try an E30 M3 ('87-91).
__________________
David Porter Glyndon MD '72 911T Targa |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
|
I have a 141K miles on my 95 M3. Engine is still strong and tight. Never have to do anything except change the oil.
It's much more reiliable than my C2. --- anthony |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
|
Yes, its european. The guy says it has 31k on it.....wish me good luck i will see the car next week.
tks for all info. |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
|
Oooooh the european version is even more fun (fast) and revvy...suspension is stiffer and lower than the U.S. version too. I'm gonna bet you'll be fairly pleased with the car
![]() Brad
__________________
73 911S Coupe sold |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Twilight Zone
Posts: 387
|
Quote:
as David said the Euro version has a different intake. It also has a different head. These two items are worth 50 plus hp. Stuttgart, I didn't think that Euro M3's were allowed in the US? |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Washington DC
Posts: 619
|
Quote:
Imported, few minor (but costly) emissions alterations and youre good to go. ![]() Never driven one, but I hear the Euro-spec E36 M3's, as compared to US-spec, are night and day.
__________________
96 993 88 911 (Sold) 87 951 (Sold) |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Twilight Zone
Posts: 387
|
Night and day, to say the least.
Thanks Stuttgart |
||
![]() |
|