![]() |
|
|
|
Registered
|
1974 911 with 2.7 engine converted to RS specs...opinions welcome
Hi all-
Curious the opinion of the drivability, reliability and performance of a 1974 911 where the 2.7 engine has been converted to the 2.7RS MFI specs. A dyno says 225hp so it appears to be in good health. Good for around town? Or not enough torque for that arena? Need to keep it above 4K rpms to be happy? More of a track car? So, just curious if this is deemed “desirable” in the Porsche community or if it’s better to stick with all stock components. What kind of premium is that worth over a standard ‘76 (or any impact bumper Porsche really)? Would it keep its value (assuming matching numbers, good condition, etc)? I realize these are very subjective words I’m tossing around, but looking for opinions so dive right in. Last edited by sadcaper; 04-17-2018 at 03:07 PM.. Reason: Changed year |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Posts: 3,590
|
A factory spec MFI RS 2.7 is a great all-round motor.
Considering that the factory only claimed 210HP , 225 sounds really strong.
__________________
1973 911S (since new) RS MFI specs 1991 C2 Turbo |
||
![]() |
|
Functionista
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: CO
Posts: 7,717
|
Currently using a 73S engine converted to RS spec with correct MFI space cam, and good rebuilt throttle bodies. Very tractable and no issues with lack of torque. I will say 7:31 final drive and a 2250lb weight probably helps a lot.
As far as value? Having the components that came with the car are what is important come sale time. Plenty worth it to me... CIS is good for what it is but it’s done by 5K rpm.
__________________
Jeff 74 911, #3 I do not disbelieve in anything. I start from the premise that everything is true until proved false. Everything is possible. |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
|
You need to drive it. I had a 2.4 t and loved it around town. Then went to 2.7 rs p/cs with modified T cams and loved that even more because how snappy it was down low and the bigger pistons made it a blast. I now have the same motor with Solex cams, and it moved the power band much higher. To be honest here, I liked the car when it had modified T cams in it for driving around town, etc. So once again, you need to drive the car if you are planning on buying one.
__________________
72 911 Although it is done at the moment, it will never be finished. |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
|
Thanks for the replies. Agreed I should drive it. It’s just a bit more than I wanted to spend on my first air cooled Porsche, so trying to get a sense if it’s worth it for the engine.
Per the dyno, done 20 years ago, the peak torque band is 4K-5krpm and peak hp is around 6000rpm. Seems a little peaky but not totally sure without driving. The dyno states 191hp at the wheels, so roughly 225hp at the crank. Seems like a strong engine. |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
|
Wait, Dyno done 20 years ago??
__________________
Gary R. |
||
![]() |
|
![]() |
Registered
|
|||
![]() |
|
Registered
|
An rs motor basically has S cams in it. Not sure if you have driven a car with S cams in it, I have and to be honest it wasn't all that fun around town or the mountain I drove it on. Now, that is not to say that once open it up its not music to ones ears as you shift at 7200.
__________________
72 911 Although it is done at the moment, it will never be finished. |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 1,241
|
That is an extremely pricey conversion. A fresh rebuilt MFI 2.7 engine on its own is worth at least $30k. A decent standard US spec Carrera these days is a mid $50k car, so if this car, which is clearly superior, can be had for about the same as a standard US Carrera I'd be all over that. That is a honey of an engine in an early much lighter chassis. Fantastic cars
__________________
No physical quantity completely explains its own existence |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
|
Well there is a cost premium over the standard car. This car is in the $75k range, so that’s a good bump from standard 70s/80s 911 pricing. Just not sure it’s worth that bump.
Original plan was pick up a standard 70s/80s 911 just to get that air cooled experience. However, is this 2.7 the “ultimate” air cooled experience so it justifies the price? Not sure. |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 1,241
|
Quote:
I haven't seen the car so take this with a grain, but at $75k I would still be all over that. A 'real' 74-76 MFI 2.7 in good shape is a rare and valuable bird at $250k-$300k+ all day and the 73 911RS for which that engine was originally designed is of course double that. The earliest G body cars use lighter gauge metal and are just a lighter more spartan car overall making for the 'ultimate' early air cooled impact bumper 911. The early mag engines are just a more rev happy and outstanding little engine, many consider them the best. As I see it the only way it gets better is if it's a 2.8 RSR twin plug RSR engine, but that is an entirely different conversation.
__________________
No physical quantity completely explains its own existence |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
|
Here’s a pic of the engine in case anyone can see anything obvious that’s missing or extra in regards to the MFI conversion. I’ll obviously get a PPI done but it seems to be a nice car. No rust. 2 owners. Nice interior. Matching numbers.
![]() |
||
![]() |
|
![]() |
Functionista
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: CO
Posts: 7,717
|
If the car still has the original transmission you will not think this a peaky car. Mine is tuned properly and has no flat spots nor does it have to be run excessively rich.
Hopefully the engine has been run some over the years and not sat dormant for too long. Looks pretty good, not original plug wires or CDI box but not a big deal as those are quality parts pictured.
__________________
Jeff 74 911, #3 I do not disbelieve in anything. I start from the premise that everything is true until proved false. Everything is possible. |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 1,241
|
Is it a coupe? Otherwise that engine looks the business. I like the MSD add-on
__________________
No physical quantity completely explains its own existence |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
|
|||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 1,241
|
Love it!
__________________
No physical quantity completely explains its own existence |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
|
You will love this car. Being that it is a '74 if I read your post correctly it is still a very light car. That coupled with the awesome 2.7 MFI power and most likely a 7:31 ring and pinion in the gearbox will be damn near perfect.
As for price, I'm not sure what is should sell for or be worth...
__________________
-Jay '74 Mexico Blue 911 3.0 EFI (Fast and Loud) '70 914/6 Race Car (Faster and Louder) '71 73RSR tribute vintage race car 3.0 '68 SWB 911T "RENNRAT" 2.8 twin plug/915 gearbox '81 Magenta IROC clone in progress 3.6 varioram/G50 |
||
![]() |
|
Functionista
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: CO
Posts: 7,717
|
Nice car, I believe the spoiler was a later add on. For sure the mirrors and tail.
__________________
Jeff 74 911, #3 I do not disbelieve in anything. I start from the premise that everything is true until proved false. Everything is possible. |
||
![]() |
|
Eng-o-neer
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 3,107
|
That's a lovely car, but $75k might get you into a driver 930. If you're willing to wait or modify, it'll also get you into a car with a G50 and a 3.6. Everyone has a different definition of what the "quintessential" air-cooled 911 is, but I'd rather be driving a G50 with a juiced motor.
I will say this: If you buy a car at market price that doesn't need much, enjoy it for what it is without changing much, it's hard to go wrong if you decide it's not for you. You're basically looking at sales tax and hassle over the churn. Education is expensive, but I'd probably be looking at a stockish G50 coupe in your position. The price difference between a middie and a G50 isn't enormous, but getting a car to be better than a G50 driving experience might be. That said, a "cheap" SC targa will tell you a lot about these cars, and the education would be a blast. I just contradicted myself three times in one post, so...you can see why this question is always tricky...And once you relinquish purism for the (arguably) better experience of a car modified to taste, well... |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 3,494
|
Quote:
|
||
![]() |
|