![]() |
912E / Dual Webers / Poor MPG / Help
Hi all, I proudly own a 912E that has been converted to dual Webers. The car pulls adequately, drives very nicely and I've even mastered how to confidently start it in cold weather (!) My only disappointment is the fuel economy (I do tend to drive with a heavy foot, generally 80+mph) - I'm averaging 20mpg highway. That seems quite low, I'd truly like to get the economy higher, at least 25mpg. Here's a list of work done to the motor:
http://forums.pelicanparts.com/uploa...1586920491.jpg So any thoughts on what to consider to improve mpg? The car has been tuned recently by a very high end shop here. If anyone can also suggest a Type IV specialist in the NY area that'd be highly appreciated. Danke! |
You seem to have a nice setup. If you’re getting 20 mpg at 80mph with a heavy foot, I wouldn’t ask for much more. When you switch from factory FI to Webers there’s always some trade off - in your case you’re getting better performance and improved driveability for lower mpg. A good Weber setup on these motors should error on the slightly rich side to avoid any chance of a lean mixture, especially at high speed/rpm. You might have the best of both worlds - when you want better fuel economy you just lighten up on the right pedal. Besides, the price of gas is coming down.
Also, it looks like you have a good elec. ignition system. If your temp gauge stays cool at sustained high speeds, I’d avoid adjustments. Bill |
Quote:
|
Rich
You could double check your timing to be certain it’s showing 27deg @ 3500rpm. Also, you might check the accelerator pump quantity on each carb - it could be set too high, but be sure to save your starting point (current setting) since the 2.0 Type 4 never came with dual carbs so quantity specs found on the internet might be anecdotal. Bill |
Quote:
|
I'll be having the car looked at with the helpful comments in mind. Out of curiousity given the mods to the engine what would be involved in going back to EFI? New pump I imagine, anything else to consider?
|
Quote:
IMO you’ll be going in the wrong direction as the Webers give you a separate throttle for each cyl. placed very close to the intake valve. The original FI system with the thermal reactors was pretty much a smog setup and shouldn’t be confused with the earlier 911 mechanical injection which was a high performance design. Here in Calif. these cars must pass smog, preventing engine modifications. Most all 912E owners here would die to be able to run your setup. JMO, Bill |
Thanks again Bill, I'm looking for that sort of POV as I'm new to this car and don't know anything other than this carb'd version. I do still have all the original FI parts btw if that makes any difference. All I've been going on are the thoughts online and in my informal research got the impression that most folks prefer FI for it's predictable starting and fuel economy which sounds favorable to me... however the performance of the current setup is pretty dang nice, just don't know if that would suffer going back to FI?
|
Fast tricky
Name? You need to research Jake Raby over on shoptalkforum.com He is well known for building our 912E motors and getting Great mpg from carbs. It is all in the package and setup. I think I have seen some of your posts on the 912E forum on 912bbs. Brook Bring k |
Hi Brook, thanks. I'm well familiar with Jake and have corresponded with him, he no longer offers parts or kits so not much to gain from him unfortunately. - Rich
|
Any idea what jetting you Are running?
|
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:36 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2025 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Pelican Parts Website