Pelican Parts
Parts Catalog Accessories Catalog How To Articles Tech Forums
Call Pelican Parts at 888-280-7799
Shopping Cart Cart | Project List | Order Status | Help



Go Back   Pelican Parts Forums > Porsche Forums > Porsche 912 Technical Forum


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread
Author
Thread Post New Thread    Reply
Registered
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Posts: 8
Red face Main bearing bores

Hi all,

Probably a stupid question, but I'll ask anyway...

I am preparing to put my 66 912 motor back together
and re-measured my bearing bores as per the Maestro's
literature directions.

Essentially, I took the two case halves (cleaned and
bare) and put them together.

When I took the first measurements I only had the 6
acorn nut case bolts tightened up to 29 lbs. I used
the Maestro's technique of starting at 15 lbs and then
working up to the final 29 lbs.

I measured and found my #3 bore to be 60.20mm, but the
#1 and #2 were 60.30mm.
I began to get very worried since I have all the new
parts ready to go in!

I reasoned that since the case is aluminum, it will
squish more with the perimeter bolts on and torqued.
I installed all the perimeter bolts and cam nuts and
torqued them to 17 lbs.

I re-measured and all the bearing bores then came in
at 60.20mm.

But isn't this too tight?

The Maestro's books (I've got quadruple redundancy)
state that the standard case should have a bore of
60.24mm +/- .005mm.

Am I splitting hairs, do I have a major problem, or is
this case one of the proverbial "tight as a bull in
runtime"?

Thanks,
Erik.

Old 07-17-2001, 07:23 AM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #1 (permalink)
Registered
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Yuma, Arizona
Posts: 216
Garage
Lightbulb

I just saw the response to your inquiry come across the 356Talk email - measurement sounds right (so look for what's wrong ).

I'll be doing the same soon and would love to see pictures of the process (measuring, assembling, checking measurements again), if you took them. I'm sure many of us have either done this, read about it, or will need to know more about it in the future and would find it interesting! I have Pellow's books as well and while they are great on detail, more pictures would be helpful. Thanks -

Scott
69 912 #3078
67 912 parts car - need parts? (with an engine that will soon be disassembled & put back together)
Old 07-17-2001, 12:16 PM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #2 (permalink)
Registered
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Downey, CA, USA
Posts: 126
Garage
Post

Hi Erik,
Sounds like your right on. I have assembled engines with less than perfect dims. You'll be fine. JMB
Old 07-17-2001, 09:10 PM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #3 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Stuttgart FRG
Posts: 2,307
Post

Hello

I think one digit is shiftet. I remeber 60, 000 to 60,020 with 0,030 as final wear area.

Now it looks like you hace the first overbore with is plus 0,25 mm

The tolerances where then 6,250 to 6,270

The 60,300 would be on the border.

Mostly the bores get slight oval over the years and the middle bearing is the first to show signs for that.

So you have to mesure crosswise to get a middle messure field.

Just look at your books what numbers are the correct numbers as I only know the "fields".

If you go to make a normal engine the tolerances are OK but if you bild up a tuning engine or will go to race then the case needs a new aligne bore up to 60,500.

Grüsse

Old 07-18-2001, 03:55 PM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #4 (permalink)
Reply


 


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:52 PM.


 
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2025 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page
 

DTO Garage Plus vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.