![]() |
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Washington state
Posts: 893
|
904 mainshaft
I see Otto's wants $775 for a 904 mainshaft. Is that trip really necessary for a 3.2 or bigger upgrade, in the interest of the 901's survival (street only)? I bought the intermediate plate on sale years ago so I'm half way there I guess.
__________________
'80 SC |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Savannah, Ga.
Posts: 2,006
|
Your problem is going to be driving it cold, gearing, and no burnouts.
The 904 mainshaft doesn't help the transaxle handle the power, it allow taller gearing for 2nd. The weakness is in the ring-and-pinion. If you want a gearbox made for that engine, you should just have him build it.. it's going to cost more than your motor, but it won't explode if you drive it right. M
__________________
I wish I had a dime for every penny I ever had. http://www.914club.com/bbs2/uploads/blog-1136350347.jpg |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Long Beach CA, the sewer by the sea.
Posts: 37,705
|
Otto's 904 mainshaft is a liitle beefier than the stock 'antique' one. I say antique because any real 904 shaft is gonna be pretty used. I haven't heard of any NOS out there.
The other problem I hear about is 1st gear. It's not in the main cluster, but rather back in the tail with reverse. The billet intemediate plate probably helps out in more ways than one. Helping out 1st gear has to be one of them. Nevertheless, abuse the throttle in 1st and it will break. This has to do with the mechanical advantage of the ratio as much as anything. |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Camarillo, Ca.
Posts: 2,418
|
Why not go with a 915 trans? It adds a little weight, but is engineered for the increased displacement/power.You would probably be out less money too.
__________________
Aaron. ![]() Burnham Performance https://www.instagram.com/burnhamperformance/ |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Savannah, Ga.
Posts: 2,006
|
...and be stuck with the worst shift pattern possible.
M
__________________
I wish I had a dime for every penny I ever had. http://www.914club.com/bbs2/uploads/blog-1136350347.jpg |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Washington state
Posts: 893
|
This doesn't look new, but perhaps they're remanufactured.
__________________
'80 SC |
||
![]() |
|
![]() |
Banned
|
Those are Brand new. They are machined for us by a shop that builds Aerospace stuff.Steve
Last edited by SteveStromberg; 01-09-2004 at 04:59 PM.. |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Washington state
Posts: 893
|
Excellent. Thanks to all for the answers.
__________________
'80 SC |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: Hickory NC USA
Posts: 2,502
|
The 915's were not that great, 911 with 3.2 had problems, that is why they went with the G50 gearbox in '87.
Currently, I track a 3.2 with a 901 gear box. Just have to be reasonable. No silly burnouts in 1st gear, no slamming gears etc. However, one of the other weak points is the CVs. Ate one set of 914 CVs, installed a set of 911 CVs, so far, no problems. IMHO, I would go with a good stock 901 gear box. Even if you destroy it, they are relatively cheap to replace.
__________________
'75 914-6 3.2 (Track Car) '81 SC 3.6 (Beast) '993 Cab (Almost Done Restoring) |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Savannah, Ga.
Posts: 2,006
|
Speaking of CVs, has anyone ever seen a u-joint setup on a Porsche?
M
__________________
I wish I had a dime for every penny I ever had. http://www.914club.com/bbs2/uploads/blog-1136350347.jpg |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: Hickory NC USA
Posts: 2,502
|
I think some early 911's had U-Joints
__________________
'75 914-6 3.2 (Track Car) '81 SC 3.6 (Beast) '993 Cab (Almost Done Restoring) |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,396
|
Some early 911s had Nadella joints. These were u-joints, but had an extra joint to allow extension as the suspension moves.
They were not well loved, and it was common to replace them with CV joints. |
||
![]() |
|
![]() |
Registered
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Savannah, Ga.
Posts: 2,006
|
I mean a modified set of honest asskicking u-joints.
![]() There are some sturdy half-shaft designs out there. M
__________________
I wish I had a dime for every penny I ever had. http://www.914club.com/bbs2/uploads/blog-1136350347.jpg |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Camarillo, Ca.
Posts: 2,418
|
the corvettes had troublefree halfshafts,perhaps modified/new flanges for the 914s. Would be a viable mod dont ya think?
__________________
Aaron. ![]() Burnham Performance https://www.instagram.com/burnhamperformance/ |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Savannah, Ga.
Posts: 2,006
|
__________________
I wish I had a dime for every penny I ever had. http://www.914club.com/bbs2/uploads/blog-1136350347.jpg |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,396
|
Quote:
If you did that on a 914, you would bind the suspension. The options would be to change the design of the 914 suspension and use an axle with u-joints, use a splined slider in the center of the shaft, use Nadella joints, or use CV joints. CV joints can be had in many sizes and the fairly easy upgrade to 108mm 911 joints over the 100mm 914 joints would probably satisfy most requirements. |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Camarillo, Ca.
Posts: 2,418
|
You could incorporate the rubber pieces like the 935s. I forget the name. The outside cv joint does have clearance issues with trailing arms do they not? I am under the impression that we are limited in this area.What are the current remedies/upgrades for this?Does anybody have pics of Nadellas as well?
__________________
Aaron. ![]() Burnham Performance https://www.instagram.com/burnhamperformance/ |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,396
|
The 935 used a rubber "guibo".
One remedy is to upgrade to 108mm 911 CVs either using the 911 parts (when going to 5-lug this makes more sense) or using the spacer/adapters that Jim Smolka has. These will fit in the trailing arm. I've got some pics of Nadellas at home, but here is a quote from Gunnar Racing: "This car has the original nadella axles, which will be kept in a cabinet. The car will be raced with CV joints (way better, way stronger, way out!!!)." Last edited by JWest; 01-09-2004 at 11:01 AM.. |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Camarillo, Ca.
Posts: 2,418
|
Is the 108mm the limit in reguards to clearance within the trailing arm?
__________________
Aaron. ![]() Burnham Performance https://www.instagram.com/burnhamperformance/ |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,396
|
I don't know, I've never measured for anything larger.
What transmission do you plan to use? I think you will break a 915 before the larger CV joints. |
||
![]() |
|