|
|
|
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Colorado Springs
Posts: 4
|
I live at 6000' and regularly drive my 1.7 F.I. into the mountains (as high as 10,000'). Where should I set the timing to get the most out of the switchbacks?
|
||
|
|
|
|
Control Group
|
altitude will not impact ignition timing, stock timing for you
you are down on power because there is less oxygen to burn, if you want to get more out of the switch backs, you want a bigger motor, or even better a turbo. Turbo will be far less impacted with high elevation than all motor
__________________
She was the kindest person I ever met |
||
|
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Broomfield, CO
Posts: 690
|
that isn't true - you tend to be able to run more timing at higher elevations. For instance, I would run 36deg advance in my Mustang when I ran at sea level in Long Beach to get the best mph out of the car (and had large jets as I had air to burn fuel). When I would go to Palmdale on a hot day, the altitude would be adjusted to say 3500ft. I would jet down a few sizes and run as high as 42 deg total advance to get max mph.
Now, that said, I would set the timing based on best power at 6000ft, nothing higher. The reason is if you set if for any higher altitude, then when you are on the throttle at the lower part of your journey you will be detonating the engine and essentially trying (or worse, actually) to melt pistons/heads.
__________________
Tim www.negativereinforcementracing.com 1972 914 1.7L turned FW190-V8 353cube 525HP SBC with Mendeola S4 transaxle |
||
|
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Broomfield, CO
Posts: 690
|
a quick for instance with a simple google search of ignition timing altitude adjustment. Oddly enough, at 4K alt they adv 7deg on the car and I was 6 deg on mine for a 3500 ft calibration
![]() Quote:
__________________
Tim www.negativereinforcementracing.com 1972 914 1.7L turned FW190-V8 353cube 525HP SBC with Mendeola S4 transaxle |
||
|
|
|
|
Control Group
|
You can't rejet a D jet car and the engine management on it is very primitive, especially compared to an '84 anything.
I would not run timing much or any advance beyond the factory specs, as I have seen more than one melted air cooled motor that was running too lean and/or too much advance. Riskvs benefit to me, but I am very risk averse, guess you can try it out and see what happens, might want to run premium fuel if you are going to go there.
__________________
She was the kindest person I ever met |
||
|
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Colorado Springs
Posts: 4
|
Wouldn't turbo charging generate as much if not more heat?
__________________
John Z. |
||
|
|
|
|