![]() |
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 39
|
951 vs 944 NA with turbo thrown on?
Hey everybody...just joined today so thought I'd make a post.
I'm an Aussie and in search of a 951. Round here 944 turbos go for about AUD $20 000 for a decent one. I realise there are differences with the 944 NA and 951 but what do you think about me buying a stock 944 and throwing in a turbo [Garrett maybe]...works out much cheaper. I can get a good 944 with belts done, low km's etc for $9 000 - $12 000. What are your thoughts about difficulty to install, difference in performance and other differences between the two models? Should I hold out for a 951 or go the 944 and save some money? |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Brisbane, Australia (Formerly: Sunnyvale, CA)
Posts: 190
|
951.
-Mark
__________________
Currently 1990 944 S2, Black on Linen, 17" Turbo Twists |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
|
Bad question to ask here cause EVERYONE will say 951.
The biggest thing I can think of on this board that people say go for the 951 is that the NA has a weak transmission
__________________
1974 914 1.8 Sold... 1984 944 my baby...more of a pain in the @$$ than takin' it with a cucumber, but I still love it. THE CAR YOU PERVS!!!!!!!!!!!! 1990 Nissan 240sx fastback aka Japanese 944 |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Kingsport, TN
Posts: 2,935
|
Ditto what has been said.
__________________
Lawrence 1986 951 2002 SLK32 AMG 1987 328GTS 2011 528i |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: MN
Posts: 604
|
This has been gone over so many times, search here and on Rennlist for the threads - there will be a million of them.
Besides all the other upgrades a Turbo has like brakes, suspension, transaxle, clutch & bellhousing, etc. when you look at what it is going to cost you will throw up your hands pretty quick and get off the retro turbo idea. The only somewhat cost effective solution would be to supercharge. That runs around $5,000 USD for the packages that have been put together. But you will still be missing all those other items the 951 has. Which is why everyone rolls their eyes and says just get a 951. |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Leonardtown, MD
Posts: 838
|
all the money involved in upgrading a NA to a turbo, your better off just buying a turbo.
__________________
1987 944 - Wrecked turned parts car 1986 944 - Awesome Auto |
||
![]() |
|
![]() |
Registered
|
If you do a careful search on the topic of putting a turbo into an n/a, you will find that certain turbos WILL fit in the glovebox.
![]() ___________________ Cars |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
|
What's it worth to you? The turbo is faster, handles better, and looks a little better. Another choice would be an S2, but it's about the price of a turbo.
Personally, I like the speed and the power you can get out of the turbo - the Vitesse kits can get you around 400WHP. The turbo has a stronger transmission, torque tube, engine, and so much more. The S2 is a better choice than the N/A becuase of the power and transmission. It will cost more to fix a turbo or S2, but it's worth the money to me.
__________________
Ryan '84 944 moneysucker edition (SFR, Corbeaus, etc.) '02 Jetta TDI 280Lb/Ft 145Hp @ wheels. RC2 PP357's |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Tioga Co.
Posts: 5,942
|
Much of the discussion centers on price. Here in the states just going by a very casual following of prices you can get a 951 for $6,000 to $8,000 if you know what you're doing, what to look for and can do some work yourself. I think it would be pretty tough to buy a 944 and turbo it for less money than it costs to buy a 951 in the US. Then the 951 will have plenty of turbo equip (suspension, tranny, brakes...). If the 951 carries a tremendous premium in Australia, it may be financially advantageous to turbo a 944 where you are. It certainly isn't a case of "It can't be done", it is simply a case of "It isn't worth it" here. If you do bolt on a turbo, document your experience for us, there are plenty of people who would be interested in what you did, how you did it, how much it cost, and how the car runs.
__________________
'86na, 5-spd, turbo front brakes, bad paint, poor turbo nose bolt-on, early sunroof switch set-up that doesn't work. Malo periculosam, libertatem quam quietam servitutem. |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: MN
Posts: 604
|
The problem with OZ is that they have a huge tax on imported cars. The idea being to promote some car manufacturer to build a plant in Australia. It drives the OZ guys nuts when they see how cheap cars are going for in the States.
|
||
![]() |
|
Registered
|
OZ, it can be done, but it will never meat the performance of the 951, Fisrt off you will need to do all the piping, intercooler, BOV, Then upgrade the fuel system, Then your gonna need a Stand alone engine managment system with a MAF or MAP because the stock ECU will not work with that type of upgrade, tehn you can only run very low boost since the CR is 9.5 to 1 on the NA, Also you will need to find a way to control the added heat, Then if you get it to work its time to do something about the NA tranny and clutch since they wont hold that kinda power for long.
You are better off doing a stage 2 SC kit with the 951 injectors
__________________
1986 951, Stock for now. ]87 924S Gaurds red- SOLD after 11 years of ownership |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 39
|
Wow, seems like there are quite a few different opinions out there about this topic. As Taz's Master points out, there is a huge difference in price between the NA and turbo models over here...and the S2 does go for similar to a turbo [plus they are harder to come by in the first place.]
The general gist seems to be keep saving for a turbo. I knew there were differences between the two models but not to that extent. Seems pointless to put in so much work on an NA when I could go the turbo and still end up with a superior car. Better keep searching and saving lol. Thanks for the info and reality check guys. |
||
![]() |
|
![]() |
Registered
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: SF East Bay
Posts: 1,856
|
"tehn you can only run very low boost since the CR is 9.5 to 1 on the NA"
I guess it comes down to what you define as "low boost". I've taken my 951 with 944NA shortblock at 9.6:1 compression up to 25psi to get fuel & ignition calibrations. It's certainly possible. Just that everyone's been trying to do it with signal massagers which allows you to adjust fuel-only. People aren't even looking at the other half of tuning a car, that is getting optimum ignition maps as well. I've seen plenty of Hondas with 10.0;1 running 15-20psi boost with no problems. Again, the secret is being able to program proper ignition. As for turbo-upgrading a 944, let's get down to the specfic nitty gritty actual implementation. If you're gonna be using a Garrett turbo, where are you getting the exhaust-plumbing? Custom headers go for about U$2500 here. Add U$1500 for a Garrett turbo. The add the following parts from the photo below at a mininum and you come up with: $150-500 exhaust mid-section $250-500 exhaust cat-back $200 wastegate & CV $100 turbo down-pipe $250 intercooler $150 intercooler pipes $350 AFM & airbox & J-boot $200 throtle-body, TPS and intake-manifold $350 head $150 harness $500 DME & KLR computers $2000 home-mechanic labor 100hrs @ 20/hr $5000 professional-mechanic labor 50hrs @ 100/hr $800 custom chips and dyno-tuning --------------------- $9450-12350 TOTAL About the same as the price differnce and you wont' get the better suspension or brakes. Be sure to add $1500 for a 951 tranny later when the NA tranny's toasted in less than 1-year... I guess this exercise is taking a big-picture idea that sounds easy and when you break it down into the step-by-step procedrue, it turns out to be ludicrous. Kinda like achieving World Peace. You can say, "Well, let's just take the warring factions off the battlefield and talk over a cup of coffee and work out their differences through dialogue and mutual respect, simple". Then when actually try to implement something like that, you realize that it's a pipe dream... The only way this project is gonna work is you say: "I want to convert my 944 to turbo, no matter what it costs!" and you can get it done. But it's not gonna happen if you say: "I'm gonna convert my 944 to turbo because it's cheaper than buying a turbo" nope... not gonna happen... ![]() ![]() Last edited by DannoXYZ; 04-21-2005 at 01:27 AM.. |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 39
|
Well I think that about answers my question. Pretty much zero point going the 944 with turbo approach as the "do it at any cost" was never my intention. Gotta say thanks for going to so much effort to break that down for me DannoXYZ...it really made things clear.
Much appreciated |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Brisbane, Australia (Formerly: Sunnyvale, CA)
Posts: 190
|
Danno,
I love that ad. ![]() -Mark
__________________
Currently 1990 944 S2, Black on Linen, 17" Turbo Twists |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: MN
Posts: 604
|
Quote:
![]() |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
|
Danno- I guess you can run High boost on a NA block. But just slapping a turbo on wont let you do it. Your gonna need proper tuning. I think one of the reasons people only really play with the Fuel mapping is because there really is no way other then a Stand alone or custom chips to tune your ignition curves. Fuel mapping has been made easy for the at home tuners because of tools like a Wideband A/f sensor ect.. It helps the person visiualize ther A/F ratios. If there was a way other then Standalone to help a at home tuner visualize there ignition curve then I bet you would see tons doing it.
__________________
1986 951, Stock for now. ]87 924S Gaurds red- SOLD after 11 years of ownership |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: SF East Bay
Posts: 1,856
|
" If there was a way other then Standalone to help a at home tuner visualize there ignition curve then I bet you would see tons doing it."
There are numerous ways. Just that the Porsche market is about 10-15 years behind the other ricers... ![]() ![]() but we don't have to be so far behind the times. Maybe 5 years may be enough. The biggest stumbling block we have to get around is this immediate reflex everyone throw up whenever you want to do something new, "Well, Porsche didn't do it that way, must've been a reason!" BAH! Fine! Keep your car in the stone-ages for all I care! Anyway, if you look outside of the Porsche aftermarket, there's a tonne of great products available. I just hooked up a S-AFC-II to a customer car last week. People always seems to be amazed at that for some strange reason. This box has been around for 15 years! I used the 1st generation one on my Supra back in the mid-80s! Apparently, too many "tuners" in the Porsche market says it couldn't be done. HAH! Just because THEY couldn't do it, doesn't mean it can't be done! ![]() |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Annapolis, Maryland
Posts: 1,360
|
Quote:
The newest version is called the XDI http://www.clewett.com/products/ignition/ignit.htm#single You can see the distributor block off plate and crank pulley wheel in this picture: ![]()
__________________
1981 Porsche 931 w/S1 engine & g31 transmission. Water-cooled intercooler Last edited by chuckw951; 04-22-2005 at 03:18 PM.. |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: independence ks
Posts: 219
|
If you had a NA with a blown motor and a wrecked turbo, it would be economical to do.
I've seen totaled turbos go for a thousand bucks here in the states. |
||
![]() |
|