![]() |
|
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 1
|
Best year for 951
Trying to plan out my future car purchasing and was wondering what would be the best year for a 951? Any input is greatly appreciated.
TIA, Brandon |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 3,003
|
Do a search. It's been covered several times.
|
||
![]() |
|
That Guy
|
This is highly subjective but most will say the '89.
The '89 came standard with all the same features of the '88 Turbo S. LSD trans, M030 suspension, 26/8 turbo, S4 calipers, ABS..etc. The big downside of the '89 is the premium you are going to pay for one. Something to consider, especially with a higher mileage one is alot of the things that make the Turbo S what it is (LSD trans, M030 suspension) are either worn out or would be replaced when you start modifying the car. So you are probably better off just buying an '87 or '88 non-s if you plan to modify. If you want an all original garage queen concourse car or dont plan on modifying much then buy the '88 S or '89. Some will also say the '86 because it is lightest, no ABS, ability to run steel control arms and early offset wheels. There are downsides though, and personally i would stick with an '87+ if you plan to track the car.
__________________
Jon 1988 Granite Green 911 3.4L 2005 Arctic Silver 996 GT3 Past worth mentioning - 1987 924S, 1987 944, 1988 944T with 5.7L LS1 Last edited by Techno Duck; 08-02-2011 at 01:57 AM.. |
||
![]() |
|
White and Nerdy
|
I love the classic Fuch's wheel look, so if I got a 951 it'd have to be a '86 with Fuch's wheels. That is just me.
![]()
__________________
Shadilay. |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 141
|
I agree with Techno Duck... if you plan to have a garage queen, and have deeper pockets.. 88S or 89..
If you plan to track.. 87 or 88 any of them are fun, may of them will need tons of elbow grease, and be prepared to pay a premium for hard to find, rare, or desireable options... And FWIW, my 87 doesn't have ABS... |
||
![]() |
|
Rickster
|
I like my '89. As noted, I did pay a premium, but this car was very well maintained and actually cheaper in the long run...
|
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 140
|
Go with a nice S2, I did.......torque at all rpm
(PS....not that I don't love the turbo's) |
||
![]() |
|
Toofah King Bad
|
968 are getting cheaper. . .same power, no turbo maintenance.
__________________
» 1987 924S Turbo - Got Boost? « "DETERMINATION. Sometimes cars test us to make sure we're worthy. Fix it." - alfadoc |
||
![]() |
|
ASE Master
|
Quote:
For me, the perfect 944 would be an S2 with the '91 hatch/spoiler, 968 door handles and mirrors, and a 968 engine. Someday...
__________________
1989 944S2 (sold after 11 great years) 1980 911SC Weissach (bucket list car) 1975 914 1.8 (future restoration) 1993 968 Coupe 6 speed (new acquisition) |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 140
|
Stock s2, 47k.......a great drive!
|
||
![]() |
|
winter-hater club member
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: salt lake city, utah
Posts: 24,705
|
1988.
![]()
__________________
2000 Corvette - ????, 2007 Buell XB9R - Astrid, 1996 Discovery - Piglet, 2000 Forester "COOL PRIUS!" - Nobody Ever |
||
![]() |
|