![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
|
||||
|
Registered User
|
Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Nova Scotia, Canada
Posts: 57
|
Thanks guy's! This looks "do-able". thanks for the speedo info Andrew, I was kinda ignoring that problem, GPS would have worked, but having the speedo work completes the package.
__________________
Gord. Scotch Village (near Halifax) Nova Scotia, Canada |
||
|
|
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 678
|
i am fairly certain that the s2 brakes are way lighter than NA, alum vs iron...just a thought
if youve got the parts to do it, do it. youll be lighter than an S2 still because you have a smaller gastank and the more spartan interior etc. |
||
|
|
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Nova Scotia, Canada
Posts: 57
|
V2, I wouldn't have thought that, but if its true, all the better. I assumed the S2 brakes would be heavier. Bigger normally means heaver, but I missed the aluminum vs steel bit.
I'm kinda excited about this project. I'm thinking manual sunroof, AC delete (all of it, remember I'm in Nova Scotia!!), light weight seats, no rear wiper or headlight motor, no back seat. Not a crazy diet, but get rid of the stuff that really doesn't add anything to the car, or doesn't work. Anyone have any idea what it could weight compared to a full up S2?
__________________
Gord. Scotch Village (near Halifax) Nova Scotia, Canada |
||
|
|
|
|
Toofah King Bad
|
P'shaw. They're plenty good enough for race cars on slicks. . .you just have to use the right pads, right fluid, and maybe put a little air on them.
__________________
» 1980 931 - Got boost? ♦ 1987 924S - Pro44 ♦ 1987 924S - Junkyard score « "DETERMINATION. Sometimes cars test us to make sure we're worthy. Fix it." - alfadoc Last edited by Rasta Monsta; 11-02-2011 at 08:34 PM.. |
||
|
|
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 678
|
Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
|
Registered User
|
The S2 brake v. NA brake weight saving is negligible. We are talking about unsprung weight saving here and although the S2 brakes may be lighter, the S2 hubs, spindles, discs and a-arms are heavier than the early offset na. Also the stock S2 sway bar, springs and wheels are heavier than the stock NA items.
|
||
|
|
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 678
|
Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
|
Registered User
|
Rasta, if you haven't experienced brake fade maybe you're just not drivin fast enough,lol...
__________________
1984 - 944 Black / Wilwood/Brembo brakes / fresh M-474 suspension / Welt 250 lb fronts / 28 mm solid T-bars / M030 bars w Racer's Edge hardware/MSDS headers |
||
|
|
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Nova Scotia, Canada
Posts: 57
|
I'm waking this thread up since I've bought the S2 donor car and this project is now a reality. Longer term (over the winter) since I don't want to stop driving the car this summer. The car is an early 85, so I'll loose my speedo drive
FENNACF, Can you elaborate on the year / model of 911 speedometer I need? "You can use a late model 944 transmission and early 911 electronic speedometer in the older 944 instrumentation clusters. " This sounds like a great solution to the speedo problem. One additional question to 3.0 l engines in early cars, where do you locate the new DME, original location under the drivers side dash, or passengers footwell? Thanks all, looking forward to this! ![]()
__________________
Gord. Scotch Village (near Halifax) Nova Scotia, Canada |
||
|
|
|
|
Toofah King Bad
|
Not so. Steel calipers weigh a ton, the Brembos weigh nothing. One ton > nothing.
![]() Also, very easy to drill the spindle and machine the hub cap for speedo cable.
__________________
» 1980 931 - Got boost? ♦ 1987 924S - Pro44 ♦ 1987 924S - Junkyard score « "DETERMINATION. Sometimes cars test us to make sure we're worthy. Fix it." - alfadoc |
||
|
|
|
|
Registered User
|
Look at Ideola's club sport build thread , he installed a speedhut gps speedo that looks factory.
__________________
Catalin '86 DD |
||
|
|
|
|
Toofah King Bad
|
Forgot about that, the unit he put in is super cool.
__________________
» 1980 931 - Got boost? ♦ 1987 924S - Pro44 ♦ 1987 924S - Junkyard score « "DETERMINATION. Sometimes cars test us to make sure we're worthy. Fix it." - alfadoc |
||
|
|
|
|
Registered User
|
Quote:
![]() ![]() Last edited by 9FF; 07-02-2012 at 10:13 AM.. Reason: rotate pics |
||
|
|
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Mahwah, NJ
Posts: 121
|
I have 88 turbo spindles and 86 turbo calipers on my 86 N/A. The pedal feel is much better than stock and it is easier to modulate. However I also installed stainless lines at the same time.
I havent added camber plates yet so the maximum camber I can get is about 0 degrees. Do it you wont regret it, plus they look really cool. ![]() |
||
|
|
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Space-time continuum
Posts: 731
|
As for the NA brakes - yes, they work great if you're running the same amount of power to a car they were originally supplied on. And yes, as mentioned, pads and fluid go a long way.
Quote:
Such as (some arrived earlier than others): power steering, ABS, Airbags, heated seats, central locking, power roof, electric seats, cruise control, etc. etc. Things like the seats and computer modules for the ABS and airbag systems is really what the weight is from. BTW - your S2 looks okay. Why not make things easier and turn that into a track car? There could of course, be things we can't see in that picture but if that car's fine I'd just use the S2. I also don't understand why you'd want to keep your early offset wheels. Those are replicas of OEM late offset wheels (likely the ones on the S2 are OEM, but not guartenteed). Those replicas have been known to fail under heavy load, and have hence been banned from PCA Club Racing. Just my thoughts. Take care! Last edited by FrenchToast; 07-02-2012 at 01:55 PM.. |
||
|
|
|
|
Registered User
|
Quote:
I woulnd't worry about weight at this time. If you are going to fit a 3.0L into your 85na chassis you will be adding a fair bit more weight anyway. A few more pounds in your suspension won't be noticed.
__________________
Mike A 85 308; 04 328; 86 944; 86 944; 86 951; 00 996 |
||
|
|
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Nova Scotia, Canada
Posts: 57
|
Thanks for all the real facts...and meaningful suggestions. Somewhat rare on the internet these days!
French Toast / 9FF - Thanks for the info. The S2 is "really rough"! The early 85 is perfect...and it's the one I want to keep. Also, this is a street car that see's some track time. I originally wanted to keep the early offset wheels because that's what I had, but now that the S2 has the same wheel (different offset of course) I'll likely change to late offset and use everything from the S2. That should be the easiest. Any other suggestions?? Thanks all!!!
__________________
Gord. Scotch Village (near Halifax) Nova Scotia, Canada |
||
|
|
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Space-time continuum
Posts: 731
|
Quote:
Quote:
And don't forget to have fun! ![]() Take care! |
||
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Rate This Thread | |
|
|