|
|
|
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 120
|
951 Consideration
I've been seriously considering purchasing a 951 for a new toy. I love my little NA but I really like the idea of having some more juice under the hood and to get that from a NA would be pretty expensive and counter-productve.
I've looked at alot of the Lindsey Racing kits that seem pretty attractive- 340WHP kit, and the basic chips/boost controlers/etc. have a few questions that I hope someone here might be able to help me out with though- -What type of power do most people run reliably with a stock long block? Turbo upgrades? Intercoolers? -I hear alot of people talking about headgasket issues when the boost is really cranked up- how much is too much? -When overhauling the engine, how is it bored out for new slugs? The M44 engine has alu-sil bores right? If you bore it out won't that eliminate the silicon etches in the bores? -When overhauling, what do most people prefer for a piston, rod, and ring combo? Thanks for any info and opinions guys! |
||
|
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 120
|
Suprised no one responded to this. This forum is usually pretty helpful with information on 944s.
|
||
|
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Kingsport, TN
Posts: 2,935
|
About 10 years ago I upgraded my 951 engine with the following:
1. K27 turbo 2. MAF 3. 1.1 bar boost 4. Head gasket 5. Extrude honed intake and matching head 6. 3 bar fuel pressure 7. Enlarged boost tubes and throttle body Engine had about 90K on it when this was done. Unknown previous owner. Rod bearings changed in 2001. Car has 162K on it now and has done 80 track events (probably more). Can't comment on how much power engine makes but it does not make 340 at the wheels. I suspect about 310 based on acceleration figures. Never any problems with engine other than oil leaks.
__________________
Lawrence 1986 951 2002 SLK32 AMG 1987 328GTS 2011 528i |
||
|
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 120
|
Thank-you very much Lawrence! This is exactly the type of info I've been wondering about. If I am to get another 944 I think I will do a similar build!
|
||
|
|
|
|
Super Moderator
|
Re: 951 Consideration
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
you will find way more information than you'd need.Quote:
__________________
'89 turbo-s (2.7, wolf3d ems, garrett dbb turbo, tial 46mm, etc. fast!) Last edited by nize; 07-23-2006 at 10:59 AM.. |
||||
|
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Kingsport, TN
Posts: 2,935
|
I forgot to mention that I installed a second oil cooler in series with the factory one plus a modified oil pan that has channels and a little one way door at the bottom of the sump. The oil pickup tube has also been lengthened so it is closer to the bottom of the pan.
The second oil cooler made a big difference for track days in hot weather.
__________________
Lawrence 1986 951 2002 SLK32 AMG 1987 328GTS 2011 528i |
||
|
|
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 120
|
I was wondering what people usually get without touching the bottom-end but upgrading the turbo, intercooler, etc. I'd be happy with 350WRHP for a toy. The Lindsey kit seems pretty attractive for this...
And I am very aware of the issues associated with not tuning a FI engine. Assuming that the car is tuned properly, you can put as much as 25 pounds in it? That's pretty amazing! Overhauling/Rebuilding- I looked into Powerhaus, Lindsey, etc about parts for the 951. I was just wondering what people are running here. Thanks for all of the info on this! |
||
|
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 17
|
If you're stepping from an NA, you'll probably be tickled with a stone stock 951. If you enjoy 90th percentile driving, the minor mods (cat bypass, chips, MBC and a day at the dyno tune) will make the car even better. I considered big gains for mine, and I've been that route with motorcycles, cars, airplanes. In almost every instance of hot rodding I wished I'd stopped at a point sooner than I did. I blame flying an F16 for this syndrome. Its hard to get fired up over 100 more HP now.
Pricing pistons was enough to keep mine at a modest output level. 86 951 |
||
|
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 120
|
The Falcon is my fav military plane.
I have been in cars that would blow the doors off of 99% of 951 out there so my step from a NA won't be that shocking... I just miss driving around in my 44 (it's parked right now) and I figured that now that I will have some extra cash I can step it up a bit and get a much better one. |
||
|
|
|
|
Ornery Bastard
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: South Sound
Posts: 2,879
|
Quote:
The block itself should be OK to 25, but there's a lot on the top that you'll need to "massage" to make it reliable.
__________________
--------- Silver 1998 Volvo S70 T5 <- Daily (Anja) Guards Red 1986 951 <- Seattle car (Gretchen) White 1976 914 2.0 F.I. <- Prodigal car, traded away then brought back again (Lorelei) |
||
|
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 120
|
Yes I would assume that the injectors might need to be upgraded for that kind of boost.... I was wondering what the shortblock was capable for boost without rod, piston, etc upgrades. 25 pounds ona stock shortblock is pretty good imo!
|
||
|
|
|
|
Ornery Bastard
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: South Sound
Posts: 2,879
|
Quote:
__________________
--------- Silver 1998 Volvo S70 T5 <- Daily (Anja) Guards Red 1986 951 <- Seattle car (Gretchen) White 1976 914 2.0 F.I. <- Prodigal car, traded away then brought back again (Lorelei) |
||
|
|
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 120
|
Why would one of the rod bearing be a problem? Some sort of strange vibration?
|
||
|
|
|
|
Ornery Bastard
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: South Sound
Posts: 2,879
|
Quote:
__________________
--------- Silver 1998 Volvo S70 T5 <- Daily (Anja) Guards Red 1986 951 <- Seattle car (Gretchen) White 1976 914 2.0 F.I. <- Prodigal car, traded away then brought back again (Lorelei) |
||
|
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 120
|
Interesting... I wonder if having the oil galleries drilled out there or putting orfices elsewhere would help?
|
||
|
|
|
|
Super Moderator
|
just get the oil pan baffle mod from lindsey.
and fyi, i've run 21psi with stock injectors and stock gasket with no problems before. i wouldn't do it again, but i didn't have any problems when i did. you could also have the stock injectors flow-matched and pro-cleaned for higher flow and safer a/f.
__________________
'89 turbo-s (2.7, wolf3d ems, garrett dbb turbo, tial 46mm, etc. fast!) |
||
|
|
|
|
Ornery Bastard
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: South Sound
Posts: 2,879
|
Quote:
![]() From what I've read, the ECU will start pushing the injectors to 100% duty cycle at WOT between 15 and 18 PSI. Personally, I'd want to have the injectors at no more than 85% duty cycle at WOT for a little margin of safety.
__________________
--------- Silver 1998 Volvo S70 T5 <- Daily (Anja) Guards Red 1986 951 <- Seattle car (Gretchen) White 1976 914 2.0 F.I. <- Prodigal car, traded away then brought back again (Lorelei) |
||
|
|
|
|
Super Moderator
|
i wouldn't do it again because race gas is expensive. if i could get hold of some, i'd have no problems bumping it back up to 21psi without reservations.
i'm currently running at 17psi as a daily driver and the motor is still running overly rich, which means there's room for more boost. it's been dyno tuned, etc. so i know it's still well within safety margins. i'm waiting to get the wolf3d ems before doing any major mods/upgrades.
__________________
'89 turbo-s (2.7, wolf3d ems, garrett dbb turbo, tial 46mm, etc. fast!) |
||
|
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 120
|
I think I'd be perfectly happy with 17psi for a DD. What were you putting down at 17psi?
|
||
|
|
|
|
Super Moderator
|
270hp and 346tq at the wheels.
even with those relatively low numbers, i've yet to encounter a mustang or corvette i couldn't beat, even the latest 06 supercharged svt's. i suppose i'd lose to one of the new 2006 600hp vettes though.
__________________
'89 turbo-s (2.7, wolf3d ems, garrett dbb turbo, tial 46mm, etc. fast!) |
||
|
|
|