|
|
|
|
|
|
Registered
|
965 heads mods
I have read here about several modifications to 965 cylinder heads. I will like to know which ones have greater impact in performance (based on experience). I have also heard that reducing 1mm from the cylinders will increase compression ratio from 7:1 to 7.5:1. Does anybody know if that can be also achieved by shaving the heads instead of the cylinders? any recommendations?
Regards R
|
||
|
|
|
|
Smart quod bastardus
|
Just remember that shaving cylinders or heads reduces deck height and this effects valve to piston clearance. I don;t know if the turbo has danger in this area like the normally aspiro engines where this is a critical dimension. But something to look at anyway.
I don't know how much margin there is with the flat top pistons on the turbo to the intake and exhaust valves as I have never done a rebild on one yet.
__________________
1979 930 Turbo....3.4L, 7.5to1 comp, SC cams, full bay intercooler, Rarlyl8 headers, Garret GTX turbo, 36mm ported intakes, Innovate Auxbox/LM-1, custom Manually Adjustable wastegate housing (0.8-1.1bar),--running 0.95 bar max ---"When you're racing it's life! Anything else either before or after, is just waiting" |
||
|
|
|
|
Registered
|
Cutting the heads or cylinders is not a great idea. You'll have issues with the squish area and with the cam chains which can dealt with but why bother.
The best option is new pistons. I believe the 965 cylinders are fully finned so you could have the existing cylinders opened to 98mm and re-plated. Then you'll want different cams, etc.
__________________
2014 Cayman S (track rat w/GT4 suspension) 1979 930 (475 rwhp at 0.95 bar) |
||
|
|
|
|
Cynical Misanthrope
|
I seriously considered this option. My approach was 1mm off the heads, and 1mm offset on the wristpin bushing for a total gain of 1 compression point. But it opens up a whole can of worms with issues like compensating for chain lengths, cambox seals, manifolds not fitting, as well as the unknowns of valve>
__________________
X-1, AFM744, Jon, '92 C2 Turbo JE 8:1 pistons, 964 cams, 38mm intakes ported/polished/twinplugged, ARP hardware, B&B headers/exhaust, 355whp. Full-blown GT35R 3.2 intake EFI pending... Where my misspent time and money is currently going. Last edited by AFM744; 04-03-2009 at 08:21 AM.. |
||
|
|
|
|
Registered
|
I'm running JE's and I don't have noticeble piston slap. I forget what clearance I have, but I set it the same as the Mahle pistons on EBS's recommendation. What clearance do you have?
__________________
2014 Cayman S (track rat w/GT4 suspension) 1979 930 (475 rwhp at 0.95 bar) |
||
|
|
|
|
Cynical Misanthrope
|
The JEs were definitely smaller than the Mahles. I gave them exact dimensions of my Mahles and my cylinders, so when the custom pistons came smaller I just figured it's the reputed evil of JE pistons. I have the dim's written down in my notebook at home... probably 2 or 3 10ths of a mm. Skirts at wristpin were almost exact, it's the crowns (above the compression ring) that were notably smaller.
__________________
X-1, AFM744, Jon, '92 C2 Turbo JE 8:1 pistons, 964 cams, 38mm intakes ported/polished/twinplugged, ARP hardware, B&B headers/exhaust, 355whp. Full-blown GT35R 3.2 intake EFI pending... Where my misspent time and money is currently going. |
||
|
|
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: S. Florida
Posts: 7,249
|
When you say going up "one compression point" do you mean going from 7:1 to 8:1, or do you mean going from 7:1 to 7.1:1?
I cant find an answer to that with google.... thanks. |
||
|
|
|
|
Registered
|
I always figured it's one full point as in 7:1 to 8:1.
__________________
2014 Cayman S (track rat w/GT4 suspension) 1979 930 (475 rwhp at 0.95 bar) |
||
|
|
|
|
Cynical Misanthrope
|
I meant 7:1 to 8:1; that's what I've always heard as "1 point".
__________________
X-1, AFM744, Jon, '92 C2 Turbo JE 8:1 pistons, 964 cams, 38mm intakes ported/polished/twinplugged, ARP hardware, B&B headers/exhaust, 355whp. Full-blown GT35R 3.2 intake EFI pending... Where my misspent time and money is currently going. |
||
|
|
|
|
Registered
|
Thanks everybody for the replies, all have been very helpfull!!!!
I will stay out of shaving the heads. Even when I think that the chain tensioners should be able to compensate for the extra chain lenght, cam boxes will definitely create an issue if not modified also. Any experience (or issues) increasing intake or exhaust ports? other recomendations for heads work? |
||
|
|
|