Pelican Parts Forums - 2020 New Random Pics

Pelican Parts Forums (http://forums.pelicanparts.com/index.php)

- Off Topic Discussions (http://forums.pelicanparts.com/forumdisplay.php?f=31)

- - 2020 New Random Pics (http://forums.pelicanparts.com/showthread.php?t=1065287)

http://forums.pelicanparts.com/uploa...1723832440.jpg

http://forums.pelicanparts.com/uploa...1723832440.jpg

http://forums.pelicanparts.com/uploa...1723832440.jpg
Harrison Ford actually outran the boulder in the opening sequence of "Raiders of the Lost Ark" (1981). Because the scene was shot twice from five different angles, he had to outrun it ten times. Ford's stumble in the scene was deemed to look authentic and was left in.
In filming the Well of Souls sequence, the producers scoured every pet shop in London and the south of England for every snake they could lay their hands on. Hence, there are snakes that are identifiable from many different geographical areas. However, once all the snakes were on set, it became clear that there were not nearly enough of them, so Steven Spielberg had several hoses cut into lengths, and these were used as well. Looking closely, you can tell which are the real snakes and which are not. Some of the weeds in the scene were lifted by Lawrence Kasdan from the Dagobah set of "Star Wars: Episode V - The Empire Strikes Back" (1980). A sheet of glass separates Ford and the arched (and highly dangerous) cobra when he falls in. The snake actually did spray venom onto the glass. Snake handler Steven Edge noted that unlike Indiana, Ford is not afraid of snakes.
Jones's hat came from the famous Herbert Johnson hat shop in Saville Row, London. The hat was the shop's "Poet" model. On the Bonus Features DVD, costume designer Deborah Nadoolman said that in order to properly age the hat, she grabbed and twisted the hat, then she and Ford both sat on it, and it eventually looked like "a very lived-in, and well-loved" hat.
"My playing Indy was mentioned to me about only six weeks before shooting started, but being second choice wasn't at all offensive. I would always assume that it would be normal for (George Lucas)- once having worked with an actor in a particular part - not to think of him for something else. I'd presume that he'd want to accentuate the difference between the two characters by having another actor. I was more than happy when they did ask me to play Indiana Jones, because it promised to be a terrific role in a great film."

http://forums.pelicanparts.com/uploa...1723832440.jpg

http://forums.pelicanparts.com/uploa...1723832440.jpg

http://forums.pelicanparts.com/uploa...1723832440.jpg
Kubrick spent $750,000, a large portion of his $6 million budget for 2001: A Space Odyssey, on the set for the artificial gravity scenes in the carousel. The set was a vertically-mounted 27 metric ton circular set 38 feet (12 m) in diameter and 10 feet (3.0 m) wide. The entire set could rotate around its axis at up to 3 miles per hour (4.8 km/h). The rim of the carousel would move slowly enough to allow the actors to walk around with it as if they were in a hamster wheel. This created the impression that the actors were walking up the walls of the set, while in fact, the actors remained at the bottom. The same technique was used for the Aries Moon shuttle scenes.
Clarke believed that the ability to transfer between zero-g and artificial gravity areas of a spaceship would be easily learnt by astronauts, and this is how Kubrick portrayed it in the film. However, expert opinion is that this would be somewhat more difficult to achieve, particularly due to the Coriolis force. Long-radius centrifuge experiments by the Naval Medical Research Laboratory starting in 1958 kept subjects in a 30-foot (9.1 m) diameter centrifuge complete with living quarters for up to three weeks. The experiments found that the subjects took three to four days to overcome motion sickness and balance issues.

Quote:

Originally Posted by GH85Carrera (Post 12303953)

Long-radius centrifuge experiments by the Naval Medical Research Laboratory starting in 1958 kept subjects in a 30-foot (9.1 m) diameter centrifuge complete with living quarters for up to three weeks. The experiments found that the subjects took three to four days to overcome motion sickness and balance issues.

That's fascinating. Thinking about the statement above, I was thinking "that had to be have on earth, and therefore in earth's gravity. If it was just a rotating room, then it wasn't really a simulated artificial gravity situation. To make it effective as an artificial gravity situation in earth's gravity (not in orbit) the thing would have had to be humming, and I can't imagine most folks being functional or healthy.

I did a little poking around and found the following.
HISTORY OF ARTIFICIAL GRAVITY

Quote:

The earliest of the extensive tests of sustained rotation were conducted in the Naval Medical
Research Laboratory in Pensacola, beginning in 1958. The Slow Rotating Room (SRR) had a 5-m-radius
with complete living facilities, in which subjects could live for periods ranging from 1 day to 3 weeks.
Rotation rates ranged from 1 to 10 rpm, with the floor of the SRR staying horizontal. Initially, most
subjects developed motion sickness symptoms when they made head movements at room rotation rates in
excess of 3 rpm and, through that experience, learned to restrict them. Incremental increase in the speed
of the room was employed. After several days, most subjects were able to make head movements without
nausea at rotation rate up to 6 rpm. Only some of the subjects could go further to move comfortably at 10
rpm.
Research was also performed to examine the problem of adapting the postural system to a 3-rpm
run. Like for motion sickness, their balance control was initially disrupted on entering the SRR, but it
recovered within 3-4 days. Then, most subjects were able to walk on thin rails about as well as Earth-
normal, throw darts, and pour coffee without having to think about motor control. They also performed
watch-keeping tasks within normal limits (Guedry et al. 1964).
When the SRR was stopped after 12 days, subjects felt an after-effect and an erroneous motion
sensation during head movements. Their balance control was again disrupted for 3-4 days. These effects
were stronger after runs at 10 rpm than after runs at 3 rpm (Graybiel et al. 1965).
The investigators concluded from these studies that humans can adapt to rotation rate of 3 rpm,
and that a 14-day period of rotation at this velocity causes no significant changes in general condition or
performance. In contrast, no adaptation took place when subjects were rotated at 10 rpm for 12 days,
implying that a 10-rpm rotation rate is close to the upper threshold of endurance.
As a next step, ways of adapting humans to rotation at 10 rpm were investigated through
incremental increases in rotation speed over time. Symptoms of motion sickness at 10 rpm, as well as
impaired balance, were prevented by increasing rotation rate in nine approximately 2-day stages over the
course of 16 days (Graybiel et al. 1969). Results also indicated that the time needed to adapt can be
shortened greatly by making many specific head movements. The higher rotation rate, the more difficult
the adaptation, but adaptation to 10 rpm was possible as long as rate-increase increments were held to 1-2
rpm with a period of 12-24 hour at each increment (Faget and Olling 1968). The time needed for this
adaptation might therefore prove to be too long for practical use during spaceflight. However, anti-motion
sickness drugs could then be used to attenue motion sickness while the terminal velocity is more rapidly
achieved (Lackner and DiZio 2000b).
Interestingly enough, during the long-duration SRR runs periodic 10-15 minutes stops were
required for re-provisioning. Over time, the on-board experimenters who helped in this activity made
transitions between the stationary and SRR rotation without experiencing motion sickness or disruptions
of movement control. They showed perfect dual-adaptation (Cohn et al. 2000, Lackner and Graybiel
1982), thus indicating that is is possible to be simultaneously adapted to rotating and non-rotating
environments. Also, in all the subjects, there was retention of the adaptation to the SRR for several days,
which implies that transitions from weightlessness to rotation should be acceptable under certain
conditions (Graybiel and Knepton 1972).
Beginning in the 1960s a major ground research program on artificial gravity was conducted at
the Institute for Biomedical Problems in Moscow. Their earliest tests in the MVK-1 small rotating
chamber at speeds up to 6.6 rpm allowed rotating one or two subjects for up to a week. It was followed by
the roomier 10-m radius Orbita centrifuge, capable of rotating two to three people for several weeks at
speeds up to 12 rpm. The longest tests were for 25 days at 6 rpm.
The initial exposures produced the expected disturbance of dizziness, equilibrium, and
coordination. Within an hour, the usual pattern of motion sickness symptoms occurred, including
vomiting in some cases. In 4-5 hours, subjects also complained of drowsiness and headache. Three
periods of vestibular adaptation were distinguished for these long-duration exposures. The first 1-2 days
were characterized by severe motion sickness. This was followed by a week during which the nausea and
related acute symptoms disappeared, but drowsiness and headache remained. Finally, after the first 7-10
days, subjects showed immunity to motion sickness, even when additional vestibular stimulation was
provided.
As found in Graybiel’s SSR studies in Pensacola, the severity of motion sickness symptoms and
the time to adapt to prolonged rotation on the Russian small rotating room MVK-1 were related mostly to
rotation rate. There was an absence of any motion sickness symptoms at 1 rpm, moderate symptoms at 1.8
rpm, and marked symptoms at 3.5 rpm. On the larger Orbita centrifuge, however, symptoms appeared
only above 1.8 rpm. Head movements brought on discomfort in all cases (Kotovskaya et al. 1981).

Yes, please
Gunther Werks Tornado.
https://cdn.motor1.com/images/mgl/Qe...ct-tornado.jpg

Not really my thing, but also very cool as a speedster
https://www.motortrend.com/uploads/2...-Speedster.png

http://forums.pelicanparts.com/uploa...1723837679.jpg

http://forums.pelicanparts.com/uploa...1723837679.jpg

http://forums.pelicanparts.com/uploa...1723837679.jpg

http://forums.pelicanparts.com/uploa...1723837679.jpg
Billy the Kid Scenic Byway, New Mexico

http://forums.pelicanparts.com/uploa...1723837679.jpg
At the southern tip of South America, at Cape Horn, there is a notable separation between the waters of the Pacific Ocean and those of the Atlantic Ocean, even though both are salty. This difference is caused by a freshwater river that originates from the melting of glaciers in Antarctica. This flow of fresh water, with a significantly lower density, creates a barrier that prevents complete mixing of the ocean waters, resulting in a visible line in the water that changes from green to blue.

http://forums.pelicanparts.com/uploa...1723837679.jpg

http://forums.pelicanparts.com/uploa...1723920771.jpg

http://forums.pelicanparts.com/uploa...1723920771.jpg

http://forums.pelicanparts.com/uploa...1723920771.jpg

http://forums.pelicanparts.com/uploa...1723920771.jpg

http://forums.pelicanparts.com/uploa...1723920771.jpg

http://forums.pelicanparts.com/uploa...1723920771.jpg
Veryovkina Cave, located in Abkhazia, holds the record as the world's deepest cave, plunging to a depth of 2,212 meters. Discovered in 1968, it took decades of relentless exploration to reach this milestone. In 2017, Russian speleologists finally achieved this record depth after numerous expeditions.

Quote:

Originally Posted by GH85Carrera (Post 12304428)

http://forums.pelicanparts.com/uploa...1723920771.jpg
Veryovkina Cave, located in Abkhazia, holds the record as the world's deepest cave, plunging to a depth of 2,212 meters. Discovered in 1968, it took decades of relentless exploration to reach this milestone. In 2017, Russian speleologists finally achieved this record depth after numerous expeditions.

https://thetravelbible.com/wp-conten...rface.svg_.png

That's nearly 1.5 miles of vertical (on top of all of the other stuff required to get there. I assume it's a multi-day journey. Crazy! I wonder what the climate is like on the way down and at the bottom!

And how do you measure the depth reliably and accurately that far underground? It's not like you can use GPS.

http://forums.pelicanparts.com/uploa...1723929466.jpg
Mark Harmon in a CBS publicity shot for the series "Sam." It aired for six episodes in March-April 1978. "Sam" was the story of a Los Angeles police officer, Mike Breen (played by Harmon) and his specially-trained police dog, Sam, a Labrador Retriever.

http://forums.pelicanparts.com/uploa...1723929466.jpg

http://forums.pelicanparts.com/uploa...1723929466.jpg

http://forums.pelicanparts.com/uploa...1723929466.jpg

http://forums.pelicanparts.com/uploa...1723929466.jpg

http://forums.pelicanparts.com/uploa...1723929466.jpg

Quote:

http://forums.pelicanparts.com/uploa...1723950140.jpg

When you live on a narrow, private road, and you are a former IMSA racer, your neighbors might be trying to tell you something. http://forums.pelicanparts.com/uploa...1723950282.jpg
http://forums.pelicanparts.com/uploa...1723950282.jpg
True story.

Something doesn’t look right. That triple roof truss should carry the weight on the exterior walls, not the interior. Also, the top plates are not depressed from the weight of the trusses. I think it’s a coincidence, the studs bowed.

That said, I always have the same number of studs underneath a multi truss/LVL/beam/etc.

Quote:

Originally Posted by GH85Carrera (Post 12304748)

http://forums.pelicanparts.com/uploa...1723988590.jpg