New Operating System - Windows Vista
 

I've just skimmed this article - seems to make excuses for another MicroSoft product.

What's your take?

http://news.yahoo.com/s/pcworld/124642;_ylt=Amw6bAZD.bjmC.HELBsgKbEjtBAF;_ylu=X3oD MTA5aHJvMDdwBHNlYwN5bmNhdA--
[QUOTE]

Michael Desmond Tue Feb 21, 4:00 AM ET

Unless you've been living under a rock for the past few months, you probably know that the latest version of Windows--called Vista--is due to hit store shelves later this year (in time for the holidays, Microsoft tells us). The successor to
Windows XP offers a little something for everyone, from eye-catching graphics and new bundled applications to more-rigorous security. In fact, there is so much in the new operating system that it can be tough to get a handle on it all.
ADVERTISEMENT

I've been noodling around with a recent beta version of Windows Vista (Build 5270) and had a chance to make some observations. While the sleek new look and polished interface caught my eye, it's what's under the covers that impressed me most. Microsoft's done a great job of improving security across the board. Things like Windows and spyware library updates are streamlined, and I definitely appreciate the more robust Backup software.

Still, there's plenty of unfinished work left to do. Internet Explorer 7 struggled to properly render some Web pages, and I found local network connectivity to be a hit-or-miss affair. And then there's the stuff that isn't even in there yet--like the intriguing Windows Sidebar, which will put real-time weather info, stock quotes, system status, RSS feeds, and other information on the display.

So during my time with Windows Vista, I kept an eye out for the reasons I--and you--might ultimately want to lay my hands on the new OS when it's available. And frankly, if you buy a new Windows-based PC at the end of this year or any time in, say, the next five years, you'll probably end up with Vista by default.

Keep in mind, this is based solely on my experience with prerelease software (and a whole new beta could be out by the time you read this). Features get tweaked, they come and go, but from what we can tell, Vista is now starting to harden into the product that will be running many, many desktops for the foreseeable future. And by and large, that's a good thing.

Here's what to be excited about:

1. Security, security, security: Windows XP Service Pack 2 patched a lot of holes, but Vista takes security to the next level. There are literally too many changes to list here, from the bidirectional software firewall that monitors inbound and outbound traffic to Windows Services Hardening, which prevents obscure background processes from being hijacked and changing your system. There's also full-disk encryption, which prevents thieves from accessing your data, even if they steal the PC out from under your nose.

Perhaps most crucial (and least sexy) is the long-overdue User Account Protection, which invokes administrator privileges as needed, such as during driver updates or software installations. UAP makes it much more convenient for users to operate Vista with limited rights (meaning the system won't let them do certain things, like load software, without clearance from an administrator). This in turn limits the ability of malware to hose your system.

2. Internet Explorer 7: IE gets a much-needed, Firefox-inspired makeover, complete with tabbed pages and better privacy management. There's also the color-coded Address Bar that lets you know if a page is secured by a digital key, or, thanks to new antiphishing features, if it's a phony Web site just looking to steal information about you.

These features will all be available for Windows XP users who download IE7. But Vista users get an important extra level of protection: IE7 on Vista will run in what Microsoft calls "protected mode"--a limited-rights mode that prevents third-party code from reaching your system. It's about darn time.

3. Righteous eye candy: For the first time, Microsoft is building high-end graphics effects into Windows. The touted Aero Glass interface features visually engaging 3D rendering, animation, and transparencies. Translucent icons, program windows, and other elements not only look cool, they add depth and context to the interface. For example, hover your cursor over minimized programs that rest on the taskbar and you'll be able to see real-time previews of what's running in each window without opening them full-screen. Now you can see what's going on behind the scenes, albeit at a cost: You need powerful graphics hardware and a robust system to manage all the effects.

4. Desktop search: Microsoft has been getting its lunch handed to it by Google and Yahoo on the desktop, but Vista could change all that. The new OS tightly integrates instant desktop search, doing away with the glacially slow and inadequate search function in XP. Powerful indexing and user-assignable metadata make searching for all kinds of data--including files, e-mails, and Web content--a lot easier. And if you're running Vista on a Windows Longhorn network, you can perform searches across the network to other PCs.

5. Better updates: Vista does away with using Internet Explorer to access Windows Update, instead utilizing a new application to handle the chore of keeping your system patched and up-to-date. The result is quicker response and a more tightly streamlined process. The update-tracking mechanism, for instance, is much quicker to display information about your installation. And now key components, such as the Windows Defender antispyware module, get their updates through this central point. Like other housekeeping features, a better Windows Update isn't a gee-whiz upgrade, but it should make it easier--and more pleasant--to keep your PC secure.

See part 2:

Part 2:

6. More media: Over the years, one of the key reasons to upgrade versions of Windows has been the free stuff Gates and Company toss into the new OS, and Vista is no exception. Windows Media Player (perhaps my least favorite application of all time) gets a welcome update that turns the once-bloated player into an effective MP3 library. The Windows Photo Gallery finally adds competent photo-library-management functionality to Windows, so you can organize photos; apply metatags, titles, and ratings; and do things like light editing and printing. The DVD Maker application, which was still very rough when I looked at it, promises to add moviemaking capabilities--along the lines of Movie Maker--to the operating system. There are even some nice new games tucked into the bundle.

7. Parental controls: Families, schools, and libraries will appreciate the tuned-up parental controls, which let you limit access in a variety of ways. Web filtering can block specific sites, screen out objectionable content by selected type, and lock out file downloads. You can also restrict each account's access by time of day or day of the week. As a dad, I can tell you this will be great for keeping kids off the PC while you're at work, for instance. You can even block access to games based on their Entertainment Software Rating Board ratings.

8. Better backups: When Windows 95 first came out, the typical hard disk was, maybe, 300MB in size. Today, desktops routinely ship with 300GB or 400GB hard drives. And yet, the built-in data-backup software in Windows has changed little in the past decade. Windows Vista boasts a much-improved backup program that should help users avoid wholesale digital meltdowns. Microsoft also tweaked the useful System Restore feature--which takes snapshots of your system state so you can recover from a nasty infection or botched software installation.

9. Peer-to-peer collaboration: The Windows Collaboration module uses peer-to-peer technology to let Vista users work together in a shared workspace. You can form ad hoc workgroups and then jointly work on documents, present applications, and pass messages. You can even post "handouts" for others to review.

10. Quick setup: Beta code alert: There are some Vista features I hope dearly for even though they haven't been built yet. This is one of them. Jim Allchin, Microsoft's co-president, says that Windows Vista boasts a re-engineered install routine, which will slash setup times from about an hour to as little as 15 minutes. Hurray! The new code wasn't in the beta version of Vista that Microsoft sent to me--my aging rig took well over an hour to set up--so I'll believe it when I see it. Still, any improvement in this area is welcome.
Five Things That Will Give You Pause

All this is not to say that Vista is a slam-dunk and everyone should be running out to buy it as soon as Microsoft takes the wraps off. Heck, Windows XP has developed into a fairly stable, increasingly secure OS. Why mess with that?

Yes, during my time with Vista, I've found more than enough features to get excited about--features that will make a sizable chunk of Windows users want to upgrade. So why would anyone in their right mind stick with what they've got? Here are a few reasons:

Pay that piper: Vista is an operating system. It's the stuff your applications run on. But it'll cost $100 or more to make the switch. Unless you're buying a new PC and starting from scratch, you may be better off saving the money for something else.

Where's my antivirus?: For all the hype about security in Windows Vista, users may be disappointed to learn that antivirus software will not be part of the package. There's every indication that an online subscription service--possibly under the OneCare rubric--will offer antivirus protection to Vista users down the road. But for the time being, you'll need to turn to third-party companies like Symantec, McAfee, Grisoft, and others for virus protection.

Watch that hourglass: Vista is a power hog. Unless you have a top-end PC with high-end graphics hardware, for instance, you won't see one of the coolest parts of the new OS--the Aero Glass interface. Microsoft did the smart thing by offering Aero Basic and Windows Classic looks as well, which will let older and slower PCs run Vista. It just won't look as pretty.

Curse the learning curve: Microsoft has already ditched some aggressive ideas--such as the whole "virtual folders" thing--because the concepts proved too confusing for users. Even so, you'll find that the new Windows changes a lot of old tricks, and not always for the better. Heck, it took me almost five minutes to find the Run command, which used to show up right in the Start menu. And many users may struggle with the new power scheme, which defaults to putting the PC into hibernation rather than shutting down. I know it frustrated me the first time I wanted to power down the system to swap out a disk drive.

Meet the old boss, same as the new boss: Microsoft has added lots of new stuff to Vista, but some features are just warmed-over fare. Windows Mail is nothing more than a rebranded Outlook Express, and Windows Defender is simply an updated version of Microsoft AntiSpyware.

So keep your eyes peeled for future previews of Vista. It may not be perfect (what software is?), but in a lot of ways, it's a giant leap forward.

Michael Desmond writes about technology from his home in Colchester, Vermont.[/QUOTE]

It may not be perfect (what software is?)

It may not be perfect (what software is?)

It may not be perfect (what software is?)

Is that what I'll be telling myself for the next five years?

Sounds like Windows has finally caught up to OSX from 2 years ago.

Is this a replacement for XP-Home, or for XP-Pro... or both??

First line or two of article.......................The successor to Windows XP .

Read into it what you will.

A guy on another car forum (Arthur Dent) said:

Smart guy hey?

They still have not debugged XP, yet they feel its time for another OS!

XP Service Pack 2 slows computers down from what I have heard and I do not know anyone ready to use it at this time, so they need to get to work on improving what they have before putting out a new version. Course that does not make as much money so Billy Boy can buy the world..

Linux is looking better and better...

A buddy tested a recent beta version... says from a clean boot to the desktop, nothing started up, it was using 600MB of system memory!

Seems like a focking HOG!

Everyone can ***** as much as they want about Microsoft, i am Solairs user myself, but until someone else has an operating system that can compete with Microsoft's 95% share of the market, complaining about it is kinda like pissing into the wind.

From what I understand, Vista is the first OS that Microsoft has produced that actually uses coding standards and source control. Previously, each little unit went off and did their own thing. There are hundreds of modules of code in Microsoft products that do the same thing, but because each unit does things differently and don't communicate, we get to run the ill-designed code on our desktops.

Bite your tongue, PPOT is all about pissing into the wind.

I heard the major upgrade in Vista is that they have changed the Blue screen of death to a green one.

Save a friend, burn a Knoppix CD.

Well, I'm on the verge of building a new machine, and once I put a nice video card in it, I might run Vista on it. If my games run OK on it, I'll use it.

Otherwise, that machine stays on XP. My current box will be shifted to Linux.

The best thing I can think of will be... I won't have to pay for it.

MSDN is good for some things!

You can have my Debian net install cds when you pry it from my old broken CD drive...

Wayne - one advantage XP has over 2k is how long updates will be made available.. isn't 2k supposed to stop being updated next year?

I've been running my beta version of Vista (Longhorn) on a spare laptop since mid-January. The laptop is a PIII, 750 MHz with 256 Mb of RAM...right at the bottom of the System Requirements spectrum.

It runs pretty good, albeit a bit slow...because of the RAM thingy. :)

Randy

Nicht! The user/ad man talk only seems as if he's supporting a notion the person who types on the keyboard wants to feel more important than they truly are - at least to their computer.

I'll give Vista a cursory shot, but me thinks by the time Vista comes out, I'll be chewing on an Apple. SmileWavy

by the time vista is actually shipping and functional (read: sp1...sometime mid/late '07) OS X will have leapfrogged it.

Computers are turning into media devices. Gates and Ballmer don't get that arena. Jobs (ie the largest stock holder in Disney) does.

End of story. The "desktop" is history. Its all about mobile devices and having access to your data. Windows mobile sucks HARD after quite a few years of trying. The only thing worse is how poorly Palm fumbled their advantage (they have done ZIP with the OS).

It'll be interesting to see what Apple unveils on Feb 28...

I'm praying for something like a PDA or palmtop from them. My life would THEN be complete. (yes, I said the same thing about my g5 iMac and quad g5... but I mean it this time!)

Dead solid perfect Todd! The term is "convergence". Everything you are used to having on your PC / Mac, will within a couple of years be on your "phone."

That said, your opinion of MS Mobile is the exact opposite of mine. Yes, it is early in its evolution and continues to evolve but MS is the 800lb gorilla and will drive the market...

Believe me when I tell you that a properly installed Exchange ActiveSync server and WM5 devices on the other end ROCKS! A couple of us are coming out this weekend to the Literature and Car Show. Find us and I'll show you some really cool stuff. :D

hmm...I have an HP ipaq (with synaptics touch pad - egad) running wm2003 2nd ed. I can't seem to find a way to update this.

Food for thought............................

Will Apple Adopt Windows?
http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,1895,1923151,00.asp

OS X flaw exposes Macs
http://news.com.com/OS+X+flaw+exposes+Macs/2100-1002_3-6041685.html?tag=nefd.top

Note: I picked these up from rloewy at CarNuts.ws.

.
Rumor has it that HP will put out a new ROM for the 6515 to upgrade it to WM5. Most device makers, however, are not issuing new ROM's due to cost of implimentation and that the newer hardware can do more, such as QVGA displays. Plus it seems that all the new radios are much, much better.

Wait till the included media player won't let you play your videos or mp3's because it thinks that you don't have the proper license. Then there's always the possibility of the "treacherous computing" ability turning your computer into an expensive paperweight because it suddenly decided you weren't properly licensed.

Some of it will probably be OK. Other parts I could do without.

Rob, that's why all my media will be staying on an XP or Linux machine. Preferrably the latter. Samba share, and use the media over the network. F that windows license BS.

DRM licks balls.

Ah yes, the view of those who need nothing more from a box, but entertainment. :cool:

Trust me, Gates is no dummy. You really have to count in, commercial industry . .. cmptrs that do work are MSFT.

Business will continue to "upgrade" . . .how often do consumers want to buy a new "media center" ?

Wait until profits dry up...business won't upgrade...they'll make due with what they've got. Until MS breaks some software with a bugfix (again).

Apple will be selling the box *and* the mobile device *and* the content. And there are a lot of people out there who need nothing more from the box...like most consumers.

Oh, and those of us who *create* the content too. Geeks aren't the only ones who "really use" computers. And even lots of geeks use Macs...most of the Caltech chemistry department is Mac-based. Seems to me it is the business drones who continue to pledge allegiance to the borg :p

Hey, I'm not happy about MSFT's hold on business. - it really Suck.

I'm just saying; entertainment is not going to take over the world of computers, and drive all the standards.

MSFT's model is really straight fwd; make it easy to write app's for windows, and you have app's people need . . .long before the tougher standards of say Apple are even understood.

I won't argue that msft has a better (more robust) OS ... they don't. But a great (robust) OS is worthless w/o app's.

sorry...I think you're wrong.

right now drm is more important to MS than sql.

We agree to disagree...

We do?

What if I want to agree? :cool:

Sure, now it's more important . ..but is it a big deal for msft? --they like to control.

then I shall commit hari kari asap

that's that yummy kind of sushi, right?

Sorry, but Island911 is clearly right here.

No offense, but Mac users tend to be tech savy, heavy users of media. While entertainment is certainly important, the need for a desktop OS for business will not go away anytime soon. Hell, we go to great lengths to ensure that our internal clients CAN'T get access to entertainment. We pay people to work, no dick around on itunes all day. And as for the apps.....Glenn is right one. Fast and dirty (unfortunately) trumps slow and secure.

Perhaps a more accurate assestment would question why mac and MS have operating systems at all. Thin client baby.......

You're missing the point. What will drive the industry is content delivery, not desktop "work". The desktop OS and computer isn't going away in enterprise, but it is at home. And even in enterprise you'll see traditional concepts going away. There's a reason we (at USC) are moving to counting heads instead of ports. Location-based services don't really have meaning in a desktop world...but they will to users.

But you would think busniess-OS-centric living up near the redmond borg.

. . .says the guy floating in la entertainment bong. :D

you betcha

you see how much the games industry grossed last year? ;)

I went back to pen and paper a couple weeks ago. My hand still hurts. And those damn paper cuts!:mad:

YOU WILL BE ASSIMILATED.