Tax Tidal Wave

[red-beard]

From the Wallstreet Journal this morning

Tax Tidal Wave
October 6, 2006; Page A14

Congress keeps breaking the Beltway Book of World Records for spending money, but the government will soon report that the federal budget deficit for the just-completed 2006 fiscal year fell to about $260 billion.

What's the secret of this deficit success that you aren't reading much about this election year? It isn't spending restraint. The federal budget expanded to $2.7 trillion last year, a 9% increase, or three times the inflation rate. Over the past six years the federal budget has increased by 49.2%.


The main cause of the deficit decline -- 90% of it, says White House budget director Rob Portman -- is a tidal wave of tax revenue. Tax collections have increased by $521 billion in the last two fiscal years, the largest two-year revenue increase -- even after adjusting for inflation -- in American history. If you're surprised to hear that, it's probably because inside Washington this is treated as the only secret no one wants to print. On the few occasions when the media pay attention to the rise in tax collections, they scratch their heads and wonder where this "surprising" and "unexpected windfall" came from.

One place it has come from are corporations, whose tax collections have climbed by 76% over the past two years thanks to greater profitability. Personal income tax payments are up by 30.3% since 2004 too, despite the fact that the highest tax rate is down to 35% from 39.6%. The IRS tax-return data just released last month indicates that a near-record 37% of those income tax payments are received from the top 1% of earners -- "the rich," who are derided regularly in Washington for not paying their "fair share."

More good news is that dividend-tax payments appear to be up as well, even though the tax rate was lowered to 15% from as high as 39.6%. A National Bureau of Economic Research study found that "after a continuous decline in dividend payments over more than two decades, total regular dividends have grown by nearly 20%" and that this reversal happened at "precisely the point at which the lower tax rate was proposed and subsequently applied retroactively." There hasn't been a purer validation of the Laffer Curve since Ronald Reagan rode off into the sunset.

As for the budget deficit, at $260 billion it is now about 2% of our $13 trillion economy, well below the 2.7% average of the last 40 years. Most states and localities are also afloat in tax collections, and including their revenue surpluses brings the total U.S. public sector borrowing down to roughly 1.5% of GDP. Not too shabby given that we're waging a war on terrorism and Congress spent $50 billion last year on Hurricane Katrina clean-up.

Anyway, we thought our taxpaying readers might like to know how much you've all been contributing to the falling deficit -- the best-kept secret in Washington.

[red-beard]

2 primary notes:

Tax receipts from Corporations are up 70% over the past 2 years

The Top 1% of Taxpayers pay 37% of all income taxes collected.

[widebody911]

Interesting, but I'm very curious what the raw numbers are behind this, what what 'fudge-factors' are being used.

[Porsche-O-Phile]

I'd love to see a breakdown by state.

[EdT82SC]

Now if we can just get those @$$holes in congress to stop spending so d@mn much money!

[turbo6bar]

If you ignore the SS surplus and trust obligations, then the deficit is indeed on $260 Billion. However, compared to past years, the total deficit is second only to year 2003.

See this blog for a detailed analysis:
http://calculatedrisk.blogspot.com/2006/09/fiscal-2006-record-ytd-increase-in_03.html

The federal government is doing no better than before. Their lack of fiscal discipline is disappointing.

[Porsche-O-Phile]

$2,000,000,000.

Per day.

On Iraq.

That's considered "sound policy" by our current administration and their congressional rubber-stamper counterparts. No wonder we've got problems.

The cost of Vietnam did wonders for the U.S. economy in the 1970s, didn't it?

I'm sure this one is helping us just as much.

[Rick Lee]

Originally posted by turbo6bar
If you ignore the SS surplus and trust obligations, then the deficit is indeed on $260 Billion.

And if my aunt had balls, she'd be my uncle. This is the even dirtier secret, namely that Congress has long used the SS surplus as a slush fund for their overspending. It doesn't matter which party is in control. They both did/do it and you never hear anyone talk about the worthless IOU's that will never be repaid. We'd have zero SS problem when the baby boomers retire if that slush fund hadn't been raided.