Pelican Parts Forums

Pelican Parts Forums (http://forums.pelicanparts.com/index.php)
-   Off Topic Discussions (http://forums.pelicanparts.com/forumdisplay.php?f=31)
-   -   Citigroup jet (http://forums.pelicanparts.com/showthread.php?t=453765)

pwd72s 01-27-2009 12:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Aurel (Post 4446474)
The most efficient approach would be to cut their salaries to reasonable levels. Especially when they run companies to bankrutpcy.

I wonder if we should cut professor salaries in State Universities, since it's pretty obvious they don't do much actual teaching.

Aurel 01-27-2009 12:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pwd72s (Post 4446707)
I wonder if we should cut professor salaries in State Universities, since it's pretty obvious they don't do much actual teaching.

I think much greater savings could be achieved by cutting social security and health benefits to retirees. After all, you guys can provide for yourselves :p.
And besides, I am not paid by the State, and I am research professor who does not teach. Told you that many times, but I am afraid your memory must be failing now SmileWavy.

willtel 01-27-2009 12:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Taz's Master (Post 4446640)
I have a few questions:

What were they doing before the purchase of the aircraft? Flying commercial, or did they perhaps have (an) other aircraft for this purpose? Was this done for cost savings, or as an upgrade? And more importantly, is it possible to save $50 million up front and charter a business jet when necessary?

This isn't their first purchase from Dassault. They got a windfall and hoped to send $50 million of it to France for a shiny new jet, typical "ghetto rich" mentality.

Quote:

Originally Posted by New York Post
Citigroup execs are also quietly trying to unload two of their older Dassault 900EXs.

Those jets, nearly 10 years old, are worth an estimated $27 million each. They were still listed for sale yesterday on the Web site of Citigroup's aviation broker, Aviation Professionals.


pwd72s 01-27-2009 12:40 PM

I agree. I think it's ridiculous that Government pays me only because I got old....

The point I'm trying to make with all these posts, a point nobody seems to have caught on to... The media is falling all over itself reporting on what it considers excessive spending in the private sector. It is conveniently ignoring Government spending excesses.

onewhippedpuppy 01-27-2009 01:03 PM

I don't work for Falcon jet, so I can't comment on the differences between their aircraft. Newer jets often have greater range, speed, and efficiency than their predecessors. These improvements can often justify a new purchase. Was that their motovation? Could they have gotten by with a mere Cessna Citation?

I will, however, agree that a struggling company receiving government money could probably get by with their used jet.

dd74 01-27-2009 01:12 PM

I'm beyond being amazed or getting angry. Indiscriminately throw close to a trillion dollars at an industry that to begin with, has suspicious business practices, and stuff like a $50 million jet invariably comes up in the mix. It's not surprising (as he shrugs).


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:14 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2025 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Pelican Parts Website


DTO Garage Plus vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.