Pelican Parts Forums

Pelican Parts Forums (http://forums.pelicanparts.com/index.php)
-   Off Topic Discussions (http://forums.pelicanparts.com/forumdisplay.php?f=31)
-   -   Watchmen? (http://forums.pelicanparts.com/showthread.php?t=461173)

jyl 03-05-2009 06:30 PM

Watchmen?
 
Anyone looking forward to the "Watchmen" movie? Or a fan of the original graphic novel? Or have a contrary opinion?

I'm reading about how "Watchmen" is the greatest graphic novel ever and the movie is either great or sucky depending on the review.

But I'd never even heard of the book before now, guess I'm just oblivious? I liked the original "Heavy Metal" magazine when in college, but otherwise have never been into graphic novels or comic books, after age 10 that is. I went to the bookstore to buy the original "Watchmen" book, then got distracted by a nubile series called "Empower". But I didn't buy either - have a hard time paying "real book" prices for a comic book.

jeffgrant 03-05-2009 06:40 PM

It was THE first graphic novel, and one of my favourites.

I'm man enough to admit that I still subscribe to Heavy Metal, and Watchmen is still one of my favourites.

There's a lot of people that are having varying things to say, but the one thing I've picked up from people who've seen the screener early is that it would do a LOT of good for you to have read the book first.

I hear it doesn't do well as a stand-alone movie.

That being said, it's kind of long, is VERY violent (comic book violence attains a whole new level of impact when brought to the big screen), drags in the middle a bit, has its schlocky parts, and the ending is different than the novel, but overall is an enjoyable film.

Personally, I'm looking forward to seeing it, as are quite a few of my friends. As long as you go into it realizing it's not going to win any Oscars, I don't think you can go wrong.

I also enjoy reading the movie reviews at Rotten Tomatoes.

http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/watchmen/


$0.02 (CDN)

jyl 03-05-2009 11:21 PM

Thanks for telling me that - I'll be sure to read the book before seeing the movie.

I actually have a backlog of movies I want to see, which is rare. Next up is "Coraline", the animated movie from Laika.

m21sniper 03-05-2009 11:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jyl (Post 4525658)
Anyone looking forward to the "Watchmen" movie? Or a fan of the original graphic novel? Or have a contrary opinion?

I'm reading about how "Watchmen" is the greatest graphic novel ever and the movie is either great or sucky depending on the review.

But I'd never even heard of the book before now, guess I'm just oblivious? I liked the original "Heavy Metal" magazine when in college, but otherwise have never been into graphic novels or comic books, after age 10 that is. I went to the bookstore to buy the original "Watchmen" book, then got distracted by a nubile series called "Empower". But I didn't buy either - have a hard time paying "real book" prices for a comic book.

The movie heavy metal was a cult classic back in the 80s.

Anyone else remember that besides me? One of the greatest sound tracks ever. I lusted after Tarna the Tarachian for many a year afterwards, hehe.

jeffgrant 03-06-2009 12:51 AM

Friend of mine just posted his thoughts on the movie, after just seeing the midnight showing (in NY):

Quote:

Just got back from the midnight showing and I have quite a lot on my mind. There are still quite a few things I need to digest, but I can say some things for sure...

First off, if you haven't read the graphic novel, don't see this movie. I wouldn't say that it's a bad movie, but compared to the novel, the experience you get from this movie is terrible. All of the people I saw the movie with had never read the novel before and all of them loathed the movie. The transliteration just does not translate to the screen the way Snyder did it, and I'll get to his **** momentarily. Honestly, don't ruin a great graphic novel for yourself by predisposing yourself to the story in this form. You'd really be doing yourself a disservice to be turned off to this incredible story by seeing this movie.

As for the movie itself, you could see Snyder's fingerprints all over it. Every action scene was slown down and overdramatized, while the same was done for much of the dialogue as well. The flow of the movie was terrible, and while that's something I was personally able to overlook because of my appreciation of the story's nuances, it isn't for the casual moviegoer.

The worst aspect of the movie, though, far and away, was the music selection. I can't describe how many scenes were ruined due to terrible background music, completely destroying the intended tone of the scene. Whoever was in charge of music for this movie needs to be shot. Maybe I'm more aware of this stuff after reading Tucker's blog, but I can't put into words how negative of an impact the music had on the movie for me. You'll cringe multiple times.

When you get past that stuff, and I know it's saying a lot, it was quite a good movie, but that has pretty much everything to do with the source material and nothing to do with anything else.

On the bright side, Haley as Rorschach was outstanding - he truly embodied the character and most every scene with Rorschach was great (and they kept almost all of his scenes in the movie). Akerman as Laurie exceeded expectations, but that's only because there were no expectations for her. The rest of the cast was serviceable, even Veidt, in spite of one of the worst casting decisions I've ever seen.

The changes to the storyline at the end of the movie are acceptable, given no mention of Shea throughout the movie (trust me, it was long enough as it is). Honestly, I think a few scenes could've been cut out. Almost everything from the novel was put to film, but the nuance was lost amidst terrible execution and flow, while it was virtually impossible for anyone who hadn't read the story before to keep up with the endless onslaught of characters.

Overall, terrible execution and direction were redeemed by an incredible story, one great performance, and a few serviceable ones. I guess I can find some relief in knowing that Snyder didn't rewrite the story; it's just a shame he did such a piss poor job in executing it.

Jared at Pelican Parts 03-06-2009 01:20 AM

I think a lot of people are really not going to get this movie. I read the comic back in high school and remember thinking.. WTF?

masraum 03-06-2009 05:17 AM

what's the premise of the story? I'd heard of the watchmen, but never read the story.

Isabo 03-06-2009 05:42 AM

I'm looking forward to the film. Unfortunately I'm quite certain that it will either be watered down for brevity and a major let down or impossible to follow for anyone that isn't into comics and heroes as well as very familiar with the Watchmen graphic novel.
Watchmen is a must read book for anyone that likes comics and superheroes with adult themes, fingers crossed for the film.

Dottore 03-06-2009 08:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jeffgrant (Post 4525683)

it would do a LOT of good for you to have read the book first.

I hear it doesn't do well as a stand-alone movie.

...a bit like The Bible then?

jeffgrant 03-06-2009 11:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dottore (Post 4526552)
...a bit like The Bible then?

I wouldn't know... never read it, or saw the movie. ;)

creaturecat 03-06-2009 05:20 PM

Runaway production. Shot in Vancouver. 250 million dollar budget. Absolute misery to work on.

cantdrv55 03-06-2009 05:26 PM

What's a graphic novel? Like big comic book?

jyl 03-06-2009 07:38 PM

OK, I bought the "Watchmen" book this afternoon and read it, so I can see the movie this weekend.

Best graphic novel I've read. But reminded me why I don't usually buy them. Too short. 400 pgs, $20, and only lasted a few hours. Still, I'm glad I read it.

Dr Manhattan reminds me of the Silver Surfer, similar powers but sans surfboard. Seems he would be powerful enough to neutralize any nuclear threat? The art was standard comic book fare, not as stunning as some of the Heavy Metal artwork.

Oh, I will say that there was not enough nubility in the panels. But that's just me.

t951 03-06-2009 09:41 PM

I just watched the movie tonight.
I have never read the book.

I was bored for a while, apparently missed a bunch of subtleties, and could not believe how long it was.

My friends, who have read Watchmen, loved it.

I would say pass on this movie if you aren't a watchmen fan.

jyl 03-07-2009 10:23 PM

I liked the movie. It is a lot like the first Harry Potter movie. Meaning that it sticks as close to the book as a movie could reasonably do, down to the dialogue and key panels, and thus can't be particularly creative on its own. Technically well done, good casting, and moves along pretty well, unless you're utterly lost, which I probably would have been if I hadn't just speed-read the book. Thanks for the suggestion, jeffgrant.

Nathans_Dad 03-07-2009 10:40 PM

Just saw the movie tonight, I read the book about a month ago or so.

My review:

Overall I liked the movie. To me, the movie has the same problems the book has. The first 9 chapters of the book absolutely kick ass. The last 3 I was left with a "WTF?" sensation...especially the ending. It was almost as if someone wrote the first 9 chapters and then asked an 8 year old how the story should end. Just like the book, I liked the first hour and a half or so of the movie. The last 45 minutes were still "WTF" although I do like the ending of the movie better than the book. The artwork and cinematography in the movie is great, it does the best job of any of the comic book movies of actually looking like a comic book. Several of the scenes are taken right off the page. Rorschach is awesome, best job of acting in a comic book movie I have seen.

The violence and sex are WAY overdone. It's almost as if the director just wanted to see how much he could get away with and still be rated R. The book itself is violent, but its violence is often suggested or left up to the reader's imagination. The movie shows it all, often in super slow motion and closeup. Some of the scenes have even been altered from the book...seemingly just to get more gore in. Also, the sex scene is ridiculous. It easily qualifies as at least soft core porn. Now, the chick playing Silk Spectre II is pretty hot, so that part I didn't mind, but sheesh...

As usual I was SHOCKED to see people bringing kids to this movie. There were several kids around 12 there and even one kid I saw who had to be less than 8. What the hell are parents thinking (or are they not thinking??)? Either the parent had NO CLUE what the movie was about or didn't care. Either one is inexcusable. One woman walked out in the middle of the movie, towing a 7 year old. At least he was spared the sex scene.

One last thing. I know Jon (Dr. Manhatten) is nude through 99% of the book. I understand that he should be nude in the movie in order to stay true to the book. Having said that, do we REALLY need to have every other scene have him in full frontal nudity with CG dong hanging there for all to see?

Overall, I give it 2 1/2 stars. Some of the cinematography is really very nice, I liked some of the music, although I agree that it is often overdone (like the rest of the movie). I still think the overall story is neat, if you like the book, then see the movie.

JonT 03-08-2009 09:05 AM

I saw the movie and was impossibly bored for 2 1/2 hours. I had not read the book so did not appreciate the characters or story. I'm not critical of it but I think a full understanding of the novel is necessary to appreciate it. Rorschach was the most interesting character by far IMO.

9dreizig 03-14-2009 09:46 AM

Hey saw the movie last night,, no expectations and had not read the book.. Really liked it!!
But I love dark, cynical, violence and sex ,, that's why I hang with you guys here on the PBB !!!

TheMentat 03-14-2009 01:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 9dreizig (Post 4543160)
sex ,, that's why I hang with you guys here on the PBB !!!

Not that there's anything wrong with that...

:D

Laneco 03-14-2009 09:15 PM

Steve and I just finished watching this. I would not recommend it....

The story line wanders around quite a bit. It lacks the both the focus and artistic nature of Sin City (a great show movie in my opinion).

Quite a bit of sex in it, one scene is just one step above pornographic. I really did not expect to see man buttocks thrusting away.

The whole thing with the full frontal blue penis shots of character John (Dr. Manhattan) just weirded me out. You would have thought that the other characters in the movie would be a little put-off by that. "Hey John, you mind not swinging that big blue johnson around everywhere? And could you please not sit your naked blue ass on the couch?"

This is really not a good movie. Though I am somewhat interested in painting Steve blue...

p.s. Steve gives it two thumbs up for gratuitous sex and violence.

angela

Dottore 03-14-2009 10:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Laneco (Post 4544135)

This is really not a good movie.

Old Nepalese proverb: "When rats mate, don't expect lions."

In other words: "Don't expect great cinema from a comic book."

emcon5 03-14-2009 10:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dottore (Post 4544203)

In other words: "Don't expect great cinema from a comic book."

Yeah, but as far as "Comic Books" go, Watchmen is something pretty special. This excerpt from it's Wikipedia entry sums it up well:
Quote:

Watchmen received critical praise, both inside and outside of the comics industry. Time, which noted that the series was "by common assent the best of breed" of the new wave of comics published at the time, praised Watchmen as "a superlative feat of imagination, combining sci-fi, political satire, knowing evocations of comics past and bold reworkings of current graphic formats into a dysutopian [sic] mystery story."[59] In 1988, Watchmen received a Hugo Award in the Other Forms category.[60] Since its release, Watchmen has garnered acclaim as a seminal work of the comic book medium. In Art of the Comic Book: An Aesthetic History, Robert Harvey wrote that with Watchmen, Moore and Gibbons "had demonstrated as never before the capacity of the [comic book] medium to tell a sophisticated story that could be engineered only in comics".[61] In his review of the Absolute Edition of the collection, Dave Itzkoff of The New York Times wrote that the dark legacy of Watchmen, "one that Moore almost certainly never intended, whose DNA is encoded in the increasingly black inks and bleak storylines that have become the essential elements of the contemporary superhero comic book," is "a domain he has largely ceded to writers and artists who share his fascination with brutality but not his interest in its consequences, his eagerness to tear down old boundaries but not his drive to find new ones."[62] In 1999, The Comics Journal ranked Watchmen at number 91 on its list of the Top 100 English-Language Comics of the 20th Century.[63] Watchmen was the only graphic novel to appear on Time's 2006 list of "the 100 best English-language novels from 1923 to the present".[64] Time critic Lev Grossman described the story as "a heart-pounding, heartbreaking read and a watershed in the evolution of a young medium."[65] In 2008, Entertainment Weekly placed it at number 13 on its list of the best 50 novels printed in the last 25 years, describing it as "The greatest superhero story ever told and proof that comics are capable of smart, emotionally resonant narratives worthy of the label literature."[66] In 2009 Lydia Millet of The Wall Street Journal contested that Watchmen was worthy of such acclaim, and wrote that while the series' "vividly drawn panels, moody colors and lush imagery make its popularity well-deserved, if disproportionate", that "it's simply bizarre to assert that, as an illustrated literary narrative, it rivals in artistic merit, say, masterpieces like Chris Ware's 'Acme Novelty Library' or almost any part of the witty and brilliant work of Edward Gorey".[67]

jyl 03-14-2009 11:25 PM

I am going to predict that the box office drops off rather precipitously after the first weekend such that the movie is not a commercial success.

jeffgrant 03-14-2009 11:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jyl (Post 4544263)
I am going to predict that the box office drops off rather precipitously after the first weekend such that the movie is not a commercial success.


The director (Zack Snyder) intentionally made the film to cater to those that have read the graphic novel and had some understanding of the context before seeing the movie. He also stayed remarkably true to the original content (with the exception of the ending).

Therefore it's no big surprise that the movie does not do a good job as a standalone movie, as that previous knowledge is almost required to enjoy it. Unless you're just into big blue penises and cool blow-em-up special effects.


I bet it easily makes more than enough in DVD sales that it will be a commercial success. It might even be able to do that from the box office, but it'll be close.

Many people that I know have intentions of seeing the movie, and the vast majority of them are just waiting for the original throngs of kids to die down a bit before they do. Don't forget that this graphic novel came out 20+ years ago, so the legions of old-school fans of this movie will be much, much older than the typical "rush to the movie the first weekend it's out" crowd. They would also tend to get the whole "cold war" headspace better than the youth of today.

So yes, I think the numbers will die off compared to the opening weekend, but not completely, and they will remain significant for a while yet. Also, it's important to realize that the exceptionally long running time of the movie results in a significantly decreased number of people that are physically able to see the movie on the opening weekend.


$0.02

jyl 03-15-2009 06:59 AM

I hope you're right. The movie introduced me to the "watchmen" novel (well actually you did) so I kind of got two birds instead of one. It did open very widely, which puts a higher bar on the first weekend take, and DVD sales are in a worrying decline. Plus "Race to Witch Mountain" is getting some buzz.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:36 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2025 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Pelican Parts Website


DTO Garage Plus vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.