fintstone |
03-14-2014 10:15 AM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by EMJ
(Post 7961443)
I suppose if you keep writing it you'll somehow believe this is true. The old man started the entire incident and finished like the coward that he is. Watch the video - he shot him in seconds. The texter never had a chance. Like 800 other posts state on this thread about the shooter - change seats.
|
You just find it painful because it is true (from all evidence presented thus far).
So the guy defending himself should have moved...so he wouldn't be attacked. Good logic I guess, but maybe it had not occurred to him that a grown man would attack him and commit assault and battery over being "told on". I know it would have never occurred to me. Hindsight is typically 20-20.
People like that are always trying to intimidate someone weaker or older. If you let them have their way every time, it would lead to a pretty miserable life. Standing your ground does not usually result in your being assaulted. When it does...you have no choice but to defend yourself or take a beating. Which would you choose?
Change seats or be assaulted...what kind of choice is that?
Obviously, many of the 800 previous posts believed the misrepresentation of the press...that this man was killed over popcorn. Made a great by-line, but was hardly accurate.
|