![]() |
There are detection systems for wheel bay fires but not usually supression systems.
And wheel fires occur on take of as well as landing, it can be a result of hot brakes from a long taxi or a bearing failure causing overheat, or a locked brake leading directly to tire ignition. That is why they have the detection systems in place. |
Quote:
http://www.nbcnews.com/id/5226424/ns/technology_and_science-space/t/historic-rocket-powered-rubber-fuel/#.Uyi8mKhdU7k http://media2.s-nbcnews.com/j/msnbc/...p.grid-6x2.jpg Quote:
|
Would an electrical fire sufficient to take out the transponder/ACAR also take out the comms?
|
Quote:
I have no insight into the 777. Here is the fire detection and suppression info: http://www.smartcockpit.com/download.php?path=docs/&file=B777-Fire_Protection.pdf |
Quote:
Had the smoke overwhelmed the crew not all of the panel would have been reactivated including possibly the transponders. |
Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Except, as I've understood it to date, the ACAR isn't switchable from the cockpit-although, thinking about it now, that's odd, for just the fire suppression reasons stated. And you wouldn't isolate the a/p as well?
I have to admit, the theory has great appeal, but... |
Quote:
the ACAR could have been damaged in the fire first. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
ONe of the sightings I heard today was the very tip of India. Isn't it like packed there and basically life runs all hours? Maybe someone was up? |
If there was a fire and it was that bad, how come the plane managed to fly on for 5 odd hours?
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Introducing for 2014, the 777 Hindenburg.
|
Jalopnik posts why a fire is unlikely.
Quote:
|
As far as this plane landing somewhere and stored for future use, answer me this:
- Don't you need a ground crew of a half dozen guys to get this thing ready to go again? - Don't you need special refueling equipment of some sort? You can't refill it with gerry cans. - One rouge pilot couldn't do all this by himself could he? I'm saying it at the bottom of the ocean.:( |
Latest, "confirmed," information.
Thailand reports it's radar picked up the left turn of the plane, supporting the claim of the Malaysian military. That would tend to lessen the likelihood the plane took a northern route (my conclusion.) Investigators claim the turn was programmed into the computer "at least 12 minutes before" the pilot spoke the last words. That tells me two things. One, the only way investigators could make that claim is if the turn program was reported to the ground via the ACARS report at 1:07 (that's exactly 12 minutes before the last words.). Two, the turn program could have been made at any time from take-off to 1:07, and for any number of reasons, some of which are not necessarily suspect, but not reported until 1:07, and not executed until 1:21. The last words, "All right, good night," showed no indication of trouble. Two minutes later, the programmed turn was executed. This is the key to the mystery--what happened in those last two minutes? Pure speculation. From 1:07 to 1:21 is fourteen minutes. That gives the pilots a window in which they could have been dealing with a "situation" they didn't consider serious enough to report, a situation that they were going through their checklist to isolate, a situation that suddenly got out of hand during the final two minutes and either required them to disable the comm. systems or the incident disabled the system. Turn is executed, the rest is unknown. |
Quote:
Nosewheel fires only happen if the tire is significantly deflated/flat... landing or takeoff. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:18 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2025 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Pelican Parts Website