![]() |
Quote:
|
The processor used in that machine is about 6 generations old.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
People need to start new threads not revive ancient history. And I need to read closer...SmileWavy |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
I'm not quite at 55, but I do use a 10" display (older Surface Pro 2) and know what you mean.
Usually it's running a 30" 2560x1600 monitor. But when traveling, I bring reading glasses to ease the readability of the tiny text. I like to travel light. |
I'm looking at the Lenovo ThinkPad X1. 12" Windows 10 Pro tablet with stick on keyboard. I havdd a Samsung Tab S3, which I can connect to my office PC, but the screen is a bit too small.
I find it funny, 12" was standard for PCs, back in the DOS days. |
For me is not worth it.. frankly I can wait a few seconds here and there when I open the applications I use..
SSD is great if you need it (or if you have a the money burning a hole in your pocket). For day to day... I don't see the value. The SSD are much smaller in capacity compared to regular HDDs, so it all depends what you want to have locally in your laptop.. cause if you have to rely on a network drive or cloud to access your files it will defeat the purpose of having a fast Hard drive in your laptop... It depends what you want and why... |
Even though the thread is old, my understanding is that SSD is great for the Operating System fast boot up but a 2nd optical drive is more reliable for storage.
Has there been any advancement in recovering an SSD or is it still the same - perfect or paperweight but nothing in between? |
FWIW I have MANY dead HDD's and zero dead SSD's. The oldest is ~8years. I must have 9 SSDs (not counting the SD cards and such)
My theory on the HDD's breaking has been that they never could survive the harsh ride of the 911 over Seattle crap roads. |
Did they ever find the Lindbergh baby?
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
To me, the irony is that with an SSD writing at 6GB/s, a 2.4Ghz CPU and 8GB of RAM, Windows is finally loading and running as quickly as it used to back when I had a 486-50Mhz with 16MB pushing Windows 3.1 on top of DOS. I've been grousing about Windows load times since Windows 95 and finally, it's solved. :D |
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:46 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2025 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Pelican Parts Website