![]() |
ITB Sizing- Recommendation
Hi All,
Looking for recommendations as I am rethinking carbs vs ITBs. Initially the plan was to build a 3.0L running 46mm PMO carbs. Following are build specs: Stock crank 70.4mm JE 10.5:1 Pistons Twin Plug 39mm heads Web Cams 120/104 cams. Close to GE 60 specs but on 100 degree lobe center vs 102 JBR Twin Plug Distributor Twin MSD ignition boxes/ coils ARP Head / Rod bolts 1 5/8" headers Dansk 2-2 Sport All parts purchased except carbs. PMO has now released their line of ITBs which look great. Couple questions / concerns: 1. ITB sizing 40mm vs 46? Plan to spin the engine around 7500. Concerned 40s too small and 46s too large especially if forced to tune Alpha N 2. Tight LCA cam and lack of manifold pressure for tuning. Options: tune hybrid Alpha N (throttle position) with manifold pressure reference? 3. Option 3 - stay with carbs Appreciate any input /feedback |
Following
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
Recommend calling William Knight.
|
Quote:
You want to keep the velocity up for throttle response, 46s will drop the flow velocity by 32% even for 3.2s the 40s are the better way to go |
distributor instead of COPs?
|
Keep in mind that it's common with ITBs to have the throttles larger than the base/port diameter, with taper in between.
|
Hi,
My engine is almost exactly the same as yours with the same camshaft profile only it’s a 3.2 short stroke with RSR Mahle p/c’s. It has 46mm PMO ITB’s and I am very happy with the way it performs. Here’s data from the hub dyno: https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/202...de8463c059.jpg |
Thanks all - very much appreciate the input.
Classic 911 - nice numbers :-) - thanks for posting the dyno results |
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:35 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2025 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Pelican Parts Website